Kaiser Health News
What Long-Term Care Looks Like Around the World
Jordan Rau, KFF Health News
Tue, 14 Nov 2023 10:35:00 +0000
Around the world, wealthy countries are struggling to afford long-term care for rapidly aging populations. Most spend more than the United States through government funding or insurance that individuals are legally required to obtain. Some protect individuals from exhausting all their income or wealth paying for long-term care. But as in the United States, middle-class and affluent individuals in many countries can bear a substantial portion of the costs. Here’s how five other countries pay for long-term care.
Japan
Long-term care insurance is mandatory for Japanese citizens age 40 and over, while in the United States only a small portion of people voluntarily obtain coverage. Half the funding for Japan’s program comes from tax revenues and half from premiums. Older adults contribute 10% to 30% of the cost of services, depending on their income, and insurance picks up the rest. There is a maximum amount people must spend from their income before the insurance covers the remainder of the cost. Workers can also take up to 93 days of paid leave to help relatives with long-term care needs. Japan assigns a care manager to each person using services; each manager oversees about 40 older adults. In 2020, Japan spent 2% of its gross domestic product on long-term care, 67% more than the United States spent that year.
The Netherlands
The Dutch have included long-term care in their universal health care system since 1968. One public insurance program pays for nursing homes and other institutional settings, and another pays for nursing and personal care at home. Enrollment is mandatory. Dutch taxpayers contribute nearly 10% of their income toward insurance premiums, up to a set amount.Out-of-pocket payments amount to about 7% of the cost of institutional care. General taxes pay for a third program in which municipalities provide financial assistance and social support for older people living at home. There is no private long-term care insurance. The Netherlands spent 4.1% of its gross domestic product on long-term care in 2021, more than any other country tracked by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, and four times the amount the United States spent.
Canada
Provinces and territories fund long-term care services through general tax revenue. Money budgeted is not always enough to cover all services, and some localities give priority to those with the greatest needs. The amount of subsidies people can receive, the costs they have to pay out-of-pocket, and the availability of services vary by province and territory, as they do in the United States with state Medicaid programs. The mix of providers also varies regionally: For instance, nursing home care in Quebec is mostly run by a public system while homes in Ontario are mostly for-profit. Notably, Canada’s long-term care system is separate from its national health care system, which pays for hospitals and doctors with no out-of-pocket costs to patients. In 2021, Canada spent 1.8% of its GDP on long-term care, 80% more than the United States spent.
United Kingdom
Local authorities pay for most long-term care through taxes and central government grants. Private providers usually supply services. Government contributions are based on financial need, with copayments usually required. As in the United States, middle-class and wealthy people pay most or all of the costs themselves. Unlike in the United States, the government provides payments directly to lower-income people so they can hire workers to care for them in their homes. The U.K. has also taken steps to shield people from losing all their wealth to pay for long-term care. It subsidizes care for people with savings and property of less than about $30,000, while in the United States most people don’t qualify for Medicaid until they have run through all but $2,000 to $3,000 of their assets. In 2022, the British government proposed extending subsidies to people who have as much as $105,000 of wealth and property, with a lifetime cap of about $100,000 on how much anyone spends on long-term medical care, excluding room and board in a nursing home. But the plan has been postponed until 2025. In 2021, the United Kingdom spent 1.8% of its GDP on long-term care, 80% more than the United States did.
Singapore
Singapore recently instituted a system of mandatory long-term care insurance for those born in 1980 or later. Citizens and permanent residents are automatically enrolled in an insurance plan called CareShield Life starting at age 30. They must pay premiums until they retire or turn 67 (whichever comes later) or are approved to use services. The government subsidizes 20% to 30% of premiums for those who earn around $2,000 a month or less. Monthly payouts start at about $440. Government subsidies for nursing homes and other institutional care can range from 10% to 75%, depending on ability to pay. Those who make more than $2,000 a month receive no subsidies. CareShield is optional for Singaporeans born in 1979 or earlier; they are covered under an older, voluntary plan. Singapore also provides a means-tested monthly cash grant — this year about $290 — to help with caregiving expenses.
Sources: The National Bureau of Economic Research project on international comparisons of long-term care; Kathleen McGarry; The Commonwealth Fund; Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; government websites.Note: Spending comparisons with the United States are based on the most recent OECD data and include spending from government and compulsory insurance programs as a percent of each country’s gross domestic product, which is the total monetary value of all the finished goods and services produced within a country’s borders. The comparisons cover people of all ages and exclude spending from voluntary insurance plans and out-of-pocket costs. All currency figures are in U.S. dollars.
——————————
By: Jordan Rau, KFF Health News
Title: What Long-Term Care Looks Like Around the World
Sourced From: kffhealthnews.org/news/article/dying-broke-long-term-care-other-countries/
Published Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 10:35:00 +0000
Kaiser Health News
Across the South, Rural Health Care Has Become ‘Trendy.’ Medicaid Expansion Has Not.
SUMMARY: Nestled in the Blue Ridge Mountains, Clemson University’s primary care clinic in Walhalla addresses healthcare gaps for uninsured and primarily Hispanic patients. Many travel long distances for care from bilingual nurse practitioner Michelle Deem. Despite being known for football, Clemson is expanding its healthcare services with state funding to support rural health initiatives. However, many Southern states, including South Carolina, have not fully embraced Medicaid expansion, limiting access for low-income adults. Advocacy groups aim to change this, seeking to improve healthcare access amid broader rural health challenges, including hospital closures and inequitable health outcomes in the region.
The post Across the South, Rural Health Care Has Become ‘Trendy.’ Medicaid Expansion Has Not. appeared first on kffhealthnews.org
Kaiser Health News
Most Insurance Covers IUDs. Hers Cost More Than $14,000.
SUMMARY: During her OB-GYN visit, Callie Anderson opted for an IUD for birth control, believing it would be covered by her insurance. After a $25 copay for the insertion, she received a shocking $14,658 bill due to her grandfathered insurance plan, which didn’t comply with the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate. Despite multiple attempts to clarify coverage, Anderson learned the plan excluded IUDs. After hours of discussions and seeking financial assistance, she wound up paying a total of $5,236. The incident highlights the importance of understanding insurance coverage before medical procedures to avoid unexpected costs.
The post Most Insurance Covers IUDs. Hers Cost More Than $14,000. appeared first on kffhealthnews.org
Kaiser Health News
Sports Betting Is Coming to Missouri. A Fund To Help Prevent Problem Gambling Will Follow.
SUMMARY: Missouri voters approved sports betting, set to begin soon, allowing residents to place wagers from home. While this offers convenience, experts warn it may lead to increased gambling addiction, especially since smartphones make betting more accessible. The state plans to allocate at least $5 million annually from sports betting taxes to fund addiction prevention and treatment. In other states like Virginia, the rise of online sports betting has been linked to a surge in gambling-related health issues and calls to helplines. Missouri aims to address these concerns by using tax revenue to expand resources for problem gambling support.
The post Sports Betting Is Coming to Missouri. A Fund To Help Prevent Problem Gambling Will Follow. appeared first on kffhealthnews.org
-
News from the South - Alabama News Feed6 days ago
Trump’s federal funding freeze leads to confusion, concern among Alabama agencies, nonprofits • Alabama Reflector
-
Kaiser Health News6 days ago
Trump’s Funding ‘Pause’ Throws States, Health Industry Into Chaos
-
News from the South - Kentucky News Feed7 days ago
Kentucky’s bourbon industry worries as potential 50% EU-imposed tariffs loom
-
News from the South - Kentucky News Feed3 days ago
WKU Mourns Loss Of Cross Country/Track & Field Head Coach Brent Chumbley
-
News from the South - Tennessee News Feed7 days ago
1-year-old killed during domestic dispute in Murfreesboro
-
Local News6 days ago
Former Ole Miss QB Jaxson Dart continues to impress as the first Reese’s Senior Bowl practice wrapped up on Tuesday
-
News from the South - Georgia News Feed5 days ago
“Very hard to believe”, locals react to arrest Lincoln County commissioner in child molestation investigation
-
News from the South - Georgia News Feed7 days ago
Georgia Senate Republicans reopen probe into Fulton DA Willis. Dems deride it as waste of time. • Georgia Recorder