Connect with us

The Center Square

U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in key redistricting case | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Steve Wilson – (The Center Square – ) 2025-03-24 11:03:00

(The Center Square) – The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a critical case regarding Louisiana’s redrawn congressional districts on Monday.

The state is defending the existing map and plaintiffs seek an overturn on grounds of racial gerrymander. The case could be pivotal as justices could examine the criteria required of state legislatures under the Voting Rights Act when it comes to balancing representation of minority groups with the drawing of geographically compact districts. 

The court heard arguments from Louisiana Solicitor General Ben Aguiñaga in the combined Louisiana v. Callais case. The state was required to add a second majority-minority district to the six districts by a court order last year. 

Justice Sonia Sotomayor suggested that one of the maps offered by the original plaintiffs would have been a better solution since it was more “geographically compact” than the state-drawn maps. 

During arguments, Chief Justice John Roberts described the newly-drawn District 6 as a “snake.” It stretches along the Red River from Shreveport in the northwestern part of the state to Alexandria and finally down to the majority-Black areas of Baton Rouge. 

It was drawn by lawmakers to connect multiple majority-Black areas together to create the court-required second majority-minority district. 



A map of Louisiana’s redrawn congressional districts. 




Aguiñaga responded that one of the key issues was to preserve the districts of key Republicans, U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson and U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise, the House majority leader. 

“This court has been clear that states have breathing room to take reasonable efforts to comply with the Voting Rights Act and they may also balance the many other interests that enter the redistricting calculus,” Aguiñaga said. “And so it was perfectly appropriate after two federal courts had found that Louisiana had likely violated Section 2 that the state sought to comply with those rulings and that it exercised its authority to protect favored incumbents and unite preferred communities of interest and accounting for those kinds of political considerations is squarely the Legislature’s prerogative.”

Attorney Stuart Charles Naifeh, arguing for the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, said “politics is the only reason that the state shows that map over the compact maps that were offered in Robinson,” the original case that was brought in 2022.

Edward Dean Greim, who represented Louisiana Secretary of State Nancy Landry, said

In its brief before the court, Louisiana officials say that “nobody truly wins in this ‘sordid business’ of ‘divvying us up by race.'” 

“And if Louisiana were to lose on these facts, that would underscore the injustice of forcing States to run an endless ‘legal obstacle course,’ lined with ‘notoriously unclear and confusing’ precedents,” the brief said. “More than any before it, therefore, this case presents a compelling opportunity for the Court to ‘call home’ – ‘to alter its course’ – rather than ‘continue on.'”

The case could have national ramifications. Alabama filed an amicus, or friend of the court, brief. Alabama was also the subject of a lawsuit that sought successfully to create another majority-minority Congressional district.

Several other states – Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and West Virginia – joined the Alabama brief that said constant litigation is making it impossible for legislatures to redraw congressional districts without facing a flurry of lawsuits. 

The Legislature adopted new maps under Senate Bill 8 to replace the ones drawn in 2022 during a five-day special session called by Gov. Jeff Landry in 2024 to address a court order from U.S. District Judge Shelly Dick to redraw the state’s congressional districts by Jan. 31.

Later, a group of “Non African-American” voters filed a lawsuit, saying that the new maps represented an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay to stop a lower court order that would’ve required the districts be redrawn again before the November election. 



FNF Louisiana Congressional District

A map of Louisiana’s redrawn congressional districts. 




The order was issued in the case known as Robinson v. Landry. Plaintiffs in that case said Black voters were unable to vote for the candidate of their choice with only one majority Black congressional district in the 2022 maps since one third of the state’s population is Black. Dick ordered lawmakers to draw a new map.

The post U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in key redistricting case | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Three committees favorable on Senate’s two-year budget | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By David Beasley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-15 15:45:00

(The Center Square) – The North Carolina Senate’s version of a state budget for the next two years breezed through three committees Tuesday with few changes or opposition.

The proposed budget, Senate Bill 257, includes income tax cuts, and a doubling of taxes for sports betting companies who operate in North Carolina from 18% to 36%.

The Senate spending proposal, unlike Gov. Josh Stein’s proposed budget, fully funds the state’s retirement plan. It also increases funding for the state health care plan by $318 million over the next two years.

It would raise teacher pay and funding for colleges and universities.

“This budget continues the success North Carolina has seen over the last decade and half,” Sen. Ralph Hise, R-Mitchell, one of the bill’s sponsors, told members of the Appropriations/Base Budget Committee.

The first year of the two-year proposed budget is $32.6 billion, the second year $33.3 billion, Hise said. It’s an increase of $1.3 billion, or 4% in the first year, and $733 million in the second year.

He described it as “modest growth” that still allows the state to replenish its “rainy day” reserve fund, which at the end of two years will be back at $4.75 billion. It will bring state funding for a new children’s hospital in Charlotte to $855 million.

It adds another $700 million for Hurricane Helene recovery, adding to the $1.4 billion already appropriated.

“It is also our understanding that Gov. Stein is working on another request for recovery needs,” Hise said. “But as yet, we are not at that place.”

Some of the state funds spent on hurricane relief will likely be reimbursed by the federal government, Hise added.

“We are hopeful the federal government will provide increased and expedited reimbursements,” Hise said. “But we must prepare to fend for ourselves.”

Under the proposed budget, most state employees would receive 1.25% raise the first year and a $3,000 bonus over the entire two-year period covered by the budget, said Sen. Michael Lee, R-New Hanover.

Correctional officers would receive a 5.25% raise with other state law enforcement officers also getting extra pay raises. Local law enforcement officers would receive $3,000 bonuses over the two-year period. Nurses employed by the state would also received higher 3.25% raises over the two years.

Teachers would receive a 3.3% raise over the two years plus a $3,000 bonus. With those raises, the average teacher pay in North Carolina will be $62,407, Lee said.

The proposed budget passed the Appropriations/Base Budget Committee, Finance Committee and Pensions, Finance and Aging Committee with only minor changes on Tuesday.

The post Three committees favorable on Senate’s two-year budget | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - South Carolina News Feed

South Carolina No. 29 in Rich States, Poor States | South Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-15 14:56:00

(The Center Square) – South Carolina is ranked No. 29 in the country in economic outlook in the 18th annual Rich States, Poor States ranking.

Fifteen state policy variables are measured in the ALEC-Laffer State Economic Competitiveness Index, released Tuesday by the American Legislative Exchange Council. Better scores go to states spending and taxing less to attain higher growth rates.






A year ago, South Carolina was 24th. The drop of five spots was matched by four other states and eclipsed only by the 10-spot drops of Mississippi and Virginia.

South Carolina is No. 8 in economic performance rank, a measure that measures 2013-23 for state gross domestic product (11th), absolute domestic migration (5th), and nonfarm payroll employment (8th).

In the 15 variables, South Carolina is top five nationally in just three: estate/inheritance tax levied (none, tied 1st); minimum wage ($7.25 an hour, tied 1st); and right to work (yes, tied 1st). The state was 20th or worse in nine measurements.

The worst categories were each 44th: personal income tax progressivity ($21.43) and state tort system costs (2.54%)..

Among nearby states in the South, Tennessee was No. 2, North Carolina No. 4, Georgia No. 13, Florida No. 15, and Virginia No. 32.

The post South Carolina No. 29 in Rich States, Poor States | South Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Arkansas News Feed

Arkansas files USDA waiver to limit SNAP junk food | Arkansas

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Tom Joyce | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-15 14:40:00

(The Center Square) – Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders said she wants her state to eat healthier.

The Republican submitted a waiver to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) on Tuesday seeking federal approval for her plan to ban soft drinks and candy from Arkansas’ Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), often called food stamps.

“America’s facing a chronic disease epidemic,” Sanders said during a news conference Tuesday announcing her plans. “Obesity, diabetes, heart disease and other chronic illnesses are personal struggles for millions of Americans and driving significantly higher costs in our healthcare system. Sadly, Arkansas statistics are even worse than the nation as a whole.”

Critics of the move, such as American Beverage, derided the governor’s decision, arguing that the waiver won’t improve health outcomes and noting that the beverage industry supports 1,385 jobs statewide and contributes $391.9 million annually to the Arkansas economy.

“Make no mistake, this waiver won’t make an ounce of difference on health,” the trade organization said in a news release. “Obesity has skyrocketed in the last two decades while beverage calories per serving have dropped by 42% – thanks to our industry’s efforts to empower Americans with more choice and information. In fact, 60% of beverages Americans buy today have zero sugar due to our innovation.”

American Beverage noted the change would still let people buy various desserts, snack cakes, and other unhealthy items while only excluding two types of products.

“If Governor Sanders is serious about making Arkansas healthy again, this would be a comprehensive effort – not one narrowly focused on excluding one population from buying just two sets of products in the grocery store,” it added.

Sanders noted that one-third of Arkansas residents are either diabetic or pre-diabetic, a number she wants the state to reduce.

“When the numbers are that high, it’s important for us to examine a system that actively encourages and subsidizes unhealthy, highly processed, addictive products,” she said.

While speaking about chronic illness, Arkansas Department of Human Services Secretary Kristi Putnam said it’s logically inconsistent for a state to pay to make people unhealthy and then pay to try to manage their poor health.

“This makes no sense,” Putnam said. “Everything we do at DHS should contribute to improving health.”

“Why do we contribute to poor health in one program and then try to fix it in another program?” she added.

American Beverage countered, saying Sanders is sending a conflicting message.

“If the Governor is sincere about what taxpayers can buy with SNAP dollars, this sends a ridiculously conflicted message: it’s okay to buy a wide array of desserts, snack cakes and treats, just not soda and candy,” it said. “How does that make sense? Now if Arkansas really wanted to save its taxpayers money, it could eliminate the $44.7 million in SNAP fraud and overpayments in the state.

The waiver also requests that the USDA let Arkansas make rotisserie chicken a SNAP-eligible item; heated foods are generally ineligible for SNAP purchases.

USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins, who attended the news conference, said the request from Arkansas fits President Donald Trump’s public health agenda.

“President Trump has given his administration, our administration, a mandate to make America healthy again,” she said. “This is one of the things he campaigned on and this is what the American people voted for.”

American Beverage noted that Trump also campaigned on U.S. jobs and stands with American workers.

“America’s beverage companies will always stand with our consumers and their right to make the best decisions for their families. We are working every day to deliver more choices and information and do our part in making America healthier,” it said. “And we’re providing the good-paying, family-supporting jobs the president wants – the type of jobs that don’t require you to be on SNAP in the first place. Just as with our consumers, our workers and products don’t deserve to be denigrated either.”

SNAP is a $119 billion program that provides food for lower-income Americans. Yet, 23% ($27 billion) of that spending goes towards unhealthy foods like soda, candy, desserts and unhealthy snacks, according to a news release from the governor’s office.

Sanders said during the news conference that she’s not banning people from buying junk food.

“The government isn’t dictating what you can and can’t buy with your hard-earned money,” she said. “It’s simply saying that taxpayers are no longer going to cover the cost of junk food like candy and soft drinks.”

The post Arkansas files USDA waiver to limit SNAP junk food | Arkansas appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Continue Reading

Trending