Connect with us

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Trump push to freeze federal funds sparks confusion in Texas

Published

on

feeds.texastribune.org – By Jayme Lozano Carver, Jessica Priest, Joshua Fechter, Matthew Choi and Terri Langford – 2025-01-28 20:35:00

Donald Trump’s push to freeze federal funds sparks confusion in Texas

Donald Trump’s push to freeze federal funds sparks confusion in Texas” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.


DALLAS — Confusion reigned in Texas as local governments, nonprofits and state agencies scrambled Tuesday to figure out just how deep cuts from President Donald Trump’s new push to pause federal spending could go.

A federal judge on Tuesday temporarily halted the Trump administration’s sweeping order minutes before the freeze on federal grants and loans was slated to take effect. Should the order go into effect as early as next week, leaders of Texas cities, counties, higher education institutions, public transit agencies and groups aimed at serving vulnerable populations will have to deal with a loss, however temporary, of federal dollars.

Little clarity about the breadth and depth of potential cuts emerged Tuesday, but a common thread did: the Texans most likely to be affected would be its least fortunate.

“The impact is on the people,” said Matthew Mollica, executive director of ECHO, the lead agency of Austin’s homeless system. “It’s on real Americans.”

Major Texas cities like Dallas, Austin, Houston and San Antonio — which rely on federal funds to help tackle crime, housing unaffordability and homelessness, among other woes — clambered to tally the potential cost should the freeze take effect.

Houston City Controller Chris Hollins said his office is calculating how much of the city’s $6.7 billion budget could potentially get the axe if Trump’s freeze took effect — but a preliminary analysis suggests the city’s housing and public health departments would bear a substantial portion of any cuts.

“Every aspect of the city, from physical infrastructure to affordable housing to public health and even to policing, there’s a potential for serious negative impact,” Hollins said.

San Antonio gets about $325.5 million out of its $4 billion budget from federal funds — including money to build housing targeted at low-income families and help poorer households get rid of lead paint in their homes.

“If confusion and chaos were the goal — mission accomplished,” San Antonio Mayor Ron Nirenberg said on X. “These are your tax dollars being withheld from your communities.”

Unclear, too, is how Texas’ state budget would hold up if Trump succeeds in his push to temporarily halt federal funds. Texas budget writers expect $98.5 billion in federal dollars to help cover the cost of state health care services, public schools, higher education institutions and highway spending among other spending priorities over the next two years. Federal funds make up about 30% of the state’s upcoming $333 billion two-year spending plan.

Representatives for Texas Comptroller Glenn Hegar and the Legislative Budget Board said Tuesday they are trying to figure out what programs would be subject to Trump’s spending halt.

The chaos began late Monday when the White House Office of Management and Budget ordered all federal agencies to “temporarily pause all activities related to obligation or disbursement of all Federal financial assistance.” The White House circulated a 51-page document asking federal agencies to review hundreds of initiatives — including rental assistance for low-income families, funding to house homeless veterans and grants for community policing efforts.

Agency officials were asked to answer questions like whether the programs included foreign assistance, “promote gender ideology” or “promote or support” abortion, among others.

The move prompted widespread confusion about which programs might be nixed, prompting the White House to insist that all programs where individuals collect benefits — like SNAP, Medicare and Medicaid — would not be paused. Rental assistance programs, Pell Grants, Head Start early childhood programs and small business grants, too, would continue. A White House memo said the pause is “expressly limited to programs, projects, and activities implicated by the President’s Executive Orders, such as ending DEI, the green new deal, and funding nongovernmental organizations that undermine the national interest.”

“This is not a blanket pause on federal assistance and grant programs from the Trump administration,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday. “People who are receiving individual assistance, you will continue to receive that, and President Trump is looking out for you by issuing this pause because he is being [a] good steward of your taxpayer dollars.”

Trump’s move drew a sharp rebuke from congressional Democrats, who asserted that the pause was illegal and that the executive branch is legally required to disburse funds that Congress has already appropriated. Congress constitutionally controls the federal government’s purse strings.

“No new president has the right or the legal authority to do what President Trump did,” U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso, said. Escobar sits on the House Appropriations Committee. “These domestic programs create jobs, they save lives, they improve health, they improve the air, they improve the water, they build roads.”

The White House has said it was not halting congressionally appropriated funds, and that the pause was merely to reassess whether programs align with the president’s agenda. The administration told Congress the pause could be as short as one day.

U.S. Rep. Marc Veasey, D-Fort Worth, called the pause a “bullshit” move to mask that Trump doesn’t have a plan to cut unnecessary spending.

“If President Trump wants to find ways to cut unnecessary spending and lower costs — we’re right here,” Veasey said in a statement Tuesday. “Work with us. In the meantime, stop messing with our veterans, our hospitals and our kids’ education.”

Confusion over the potential freeze extended beyond Washington.

The state’s higher education institutions also assessed what a pause could mean for students and research endeavors.

Before a federal judge paused Trump’s move, Texas A&M University President Mark A. Welsh III, told faculty and staff in an email Tuesday afternoon that federal agencies have already begun reaching out to the university with initial guidance.

Officials at the University of Texas at Austin instructed researchers to continue work on already funded projects.

“Even so, at this time we do not believe it is necessary to pause federally funded research activities unless you have received a stop-work order from the federal sponsor directly,” Daniel Jaffe, vice president for research, wrote in an email obtained by the Austin American-Statesman. “We currently expect the pause to be lifted within a few weeks, at which point reimbursements will resume for work funded by federal grants and cooperative agreements, and the university will be able to recover the funds it has advanced.”

Texas’ social service agencies including the state Health and Human Services Commission, which manages billions in state and federal aid to low income Texans, did not answer questions about whether their agencies were unable to access federal funds, specifically when it comes to their largest programs: Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), also known as food stamps.

In Texas, 3.6 million residents receive federal food assistance, and those dollars, dispensed on a debit-like Lone Star Card, are spent at grocery and food retailers throughout the state. In November, more than $642 million in Texas SNAP transactions were made to retailers, according to Texas HHS. In the fiscal year that ended on Aug. 31, more than $7 billion in SNAP funding was distributed to Texans.

More than 4 million Texans, mostly children, are enrolled in the Medicaid and CHIP programs. Those programs pay for health care mostly for low-income residents, including children, their mothers and elderly Texans. In the state’s current two-year budget, Medicaid’s budget is $80.9 billion, most of that from the federal government.

A staff memo obtained by The Texas Tribune from Dr. Jennifer Shuford, the Department of State Health Services’ commissioner, told workers little information was available about the freeze and impact on services.

“This morning we learned about the federal government’s plan to freeze federal grants and loans as part of a review of spending,” Shuford said in the memo. “While we do not know the details about whether or how these plans affect DSHS, I want to assure you that everyone will get their January paycheck on February 1st.”

If the freeze resumes, it could have a disproportionate impact on rural communities, where about 3 million Texans reside, said Ashley Harris, director of policy and advocacy for the United Ways of Texas.

“Rural nonprofits and communities often have fewer funding options,” Harris said. “Relying on federal grants is really critical to filling in the gaps for local services.”

Disclosure: Texas A&M University, University of Texas at Austin and United Ways of Texas have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune’s journalism. Find a complete list of them here.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/01/28/texas-trump-federal-spending-freeze/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Texas postpartum Medicaid extension slow to rollout

Published

on

feeds.texastribune.org – By Eleanor Klibanoff – 2025-01-30 05:00:00

Many new moms in Texas don’t know they qualify for a year of Medicaid, doctors say

Many new moms in Texas don’t know they qualify for a year of Medicaid, doctors say” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.


Almost all of the pregnant women Dr. Joshua Splinter sees at his rural East Texas practice are on Medicaid. For years, he would treat these patients during pregnancy, deliver their babies and then start the mad dash to squeeze in a follow-up visit before they lost insurance just eight weeks after giving birth.

This just didn’t work for him or his patients. He’d get someone on a treatment plan for a chronic condition, but then the hormone and weight changes after childbirth would require different interventions. He’d see early signs of postpartum depression or partner violence, and then lose contact with the patient once she lost insurance.

“These aren’t things where I start a medication and we’re done,” he said. “This requires close follow-up with continued treatment and non-medical intervention, and we can’t get that done in two months.”

So when the Texas Legislature voted to extend postpartum Medicaid to a full year in 2023, Splinter was ecstatic. This was going to be a “game changer” for his patients, he said.

But almost two years later, many of his patients and those like them across the state are still struggling to get the full range of health care they were promised. It took almost a year for the extended coverage to go into effect, leaving many of his patients in limbo, and even now, they’re still often falling through the cracks in Texas’ health care system.

The number of pregnant and postpartum Texans enrolled in Medicaid has almost doubled since before the pandemic, to more than 265,000. But many patients are unaware that they are still covered for an additional 10 months, according to a survey from Texans Care for Children, a health advocacy group. New moms report being unable to access the physical and mental health services covered by Medicaid, and doctors say changes are needed to ensure the workforce, reimbursement rates and coverage can keep up with a full year of need.

As the Legislature returns, Diana Forester, health policy director with Texans Care for Children, said there’s still much work to be done, such as increasing provider awareness and patient access, to ensure new moms are fully benefiting from this extended coverage.

“You can’t just turn on this extended coverage and expect that to be the end,” Forester said. “We as a state need to figure out what postpartum care looks like in Texas … Our leaders have an opportunity to make that work better for families, but it’s not there yet.”

How we got here

When Gov. Greg Abbott signed House Bill 12 into law in May 2023, Texas became the 41st state to extend postpartum Medicaid to 12 months. It was a victory years in the making, after several sessions of advocacy from health care providers, maternal health experts and moms themselves.

The state almost passed it in 2021, after the federal COVID relief package eased the way for states to get this extended coverage approved, but the Legislature instead passed a six-month extension that the federal government deemed “not approvable.”

But when the Legislature returned in 2023, Roe v. Wade had been overturned, abortion was virtually banned in Texas, and there was new momentum around bills to support pregnant women and families.

Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, a Republican from Brenham, carried the bill on the Senate side, and said at a hearing that extending coverage was about making sure “women who give birth to children in this pro-life environment are cared for … You cannot raise a child without being healthy.”

The bill passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, and Abbott signed it into law in May 2023. HHSC submitted the waiver request to the federal government, which approved it last January. The state began offering extended coverage March 1, 2024.

Awareness among doctors

After all that back and forth, half-steps and setbacks, many doctors were unaware that the extended coverage was actually in effect, Texans Care for Children found in its survey. Some doctors found out for the first time through their billing departments. Several said they wanted more outreach from the state health agency and the managed care organizations, like a flyer or training for doctors.

“The state could do a lot more in that area,” said Helen Kent Davis, a senior policy advisor to the Texas Academy of Family Physicians. “They’ve tried, to the extent that there’s funding for outreach, to get the word out, but there’s more to be done, for sure.”

In a statement, a spokesperson for Texas’ Health and Human Services Commission said they used a variety of approaches to inform the public about these changes, including calls and webinars, provider notices, posting information to their websites and working with managed care organizations to get the word out.

But knowledge gaps remain, Kent Davis said. As an example, she said pediatricians have not been educated on this change the way OB/GYNs and family physicians have. Since they’re seeing the baby regularly, these doctors could be a key ally in making sure the mom knows she still has coverage.

Doctors also report confusion about who is responsible for overseeing this year of health care. Texas Medicaid changed its policy to allow an OB/GYN to serve as a patient’s doctor for the whole year, but the survey found many doctors across specialties were not aware of that and, when asked, said they would prefer patients be handed off to a primary care provider.

“Patients have been seeing their obstetrician this whole time and the health care system is not good at handing them back to a primary care physician for the rest of that period,” Kent Davis said. “This is a significant culture shift for patients and providers.”

And with a shortage of primary care physicians, especially in rural areas, more coverage doesn’t automatically translate into more health care. One new mother in Mineral Wells told Texans Care for Children she would have to travel almost an hour to Fort Worth to see a primary care provider.

“Every day, I get really bad headaches… very bad headaches,” she said. “And it’s getting more consistent. I just deal with it.”

Awareness among patients

In a state where almost half of all pregnant women typically lost insurance two months after giving birth, convincing new moms that they can continue engaging with the health care system has been an uphill battle. Home-visiting nurses, community health workers and others who work closely with new moms report significant confusion and resistance from patients.

“They really had to talk their patients into accessing care, essentially, because they’re so used to not having coverage and so worried about the cost and having to absorb that personally,” Forester said.

It didn’t help matters that this extended coverage finally went into effect amid a historic fracture to the state’s Medicaid system. For three years during the pandemic, states kept everyone enrolled in Medicaid, but in spring 2023, were allowed to move people off their rolls.

Texas removed more people, including postpartum women, faster than any other state, against federal guidelines, The Texas Tribune and ProPublica found. The state required almost everyone to resubmit documents proving their eligibility, rather than relying on automatic approvals like other states. More than a million people lost coverage for bureaucratic reasons like failing to return a form. The state has acknowledged some errors, which they later fixed.

Amid this upheaval, Texas implemented the extended coverage, including reinstating women who lost Medicaid at two months but were still in their one-year postpartum period.

“It was really confusing for members who were like, ‘you terminated my Medicaid a month ago, I have the notice,’ and then they’re told that it’s being turned back on for a few more months,” Forester said. “And it’s really hard for a doctor to be able to educate their patients when it’s totally dependent on where they are in the postpartum period.”

Splinter said he’s had at least a dozen patients over the last year who had to call their managed care organization to get their coverage reinstated.

“I’m having to act a little like a social worker and educate the patient on who they need to call and what they need to say,” he said. As a family physician trained in high-risk pregnancies practicing in an underserved area, Splinter said, “there’s only so much of me to go around, especially if I have to spend more time on non-doctor work like this.”

A spokesperson for the state’s health agency said everyone who was enrolled in Medicaid or CHIP during their pregnancy were automatically reinstated for the remainder of their postpartum period. While some of this is naturally sorting itself out the longer the policy is in effect, Splinter said he was surprised at the work his patients had to do to get the coverage they qualified for.

“You’re leaving pregnant patients and new moms to fight up the chain and solve it themselves from the bottom” he said. “That just isn’t the right way to be doing this.”

More work to be done

As more new moms are able to take advantage of this extended coverage, doctors and advocates hope the health care system is able to meet their needs. In the short term, Splinter said, he’s hopeful that the state can proactively go back through its records and ensure women who qualify for this coverage are actually getting it.

In the long term, the state needs to address long-standing structural problems facing its health care system, like significant shortages in primary care and mental health providers. Advocates are pushing for increased reimbursement rates and reforms to the bureaucracy that providers must go through to accept Medicaid, to ensure doctors are willing to see these patients.

They also want Medicaid coverage to catch up to the extended time period women can receive these benefits.

For example, Texas Medicaid covers one postpartum depression screening, even though national groups recommend at least four, Kent Davis said. With an extra ten months of coverage, that’s a lot more touch points for doctors to be screening patients for mental health needs. She’d also like to see Medicaid cover lactation support among other needs that can emerge in the first 12 months postpartum.

“It takes a comprehensive strategy,” Kent Davis said. “Obviously the coverage issue was one part to address and, and we’re so happy that we were able to pass House Bill 12. But now that we have this coverage, what do we do to make sure women can get it?”

Disclosure: Texans Care for Children has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune’s journalism. Find a complete list of them here.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/01/30/texas-postpartum-medicaid-slow-rollout/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Amber Alert issued for Missouri City 15-year-old after she left her high school Monday

Published

on

www.youtube.com – KPRC 2 Click2Houston – 2025-01-29 22:05:56

SUMMARY: A mother anxiously awaits the safe return of her 15-year-old daughter, Serenity Turner Douglas, who has been missing since Monday after leaving Elkin High School in Fort Bend County. Serenity was last seen getting into a vehicle and has not been located since. Missouri City police have identified her biological mother, Megan Lur, as a suspect. Serenity’s adoptive mother is concerned for her safety, as she takes medication for mental health issues. An Amber Alert was issued, and authorities are urging anyone with information to contact the Missouri City Police Department.

According to the Missouri City Police Department, Serenity Turner-Douglas was last seen leaving Elkins High School shortly before noon on Monday and getting into a silver SUV with possible license plate number VTW-6019.

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Washington D.C. plane crash: Passenger jet collides with helicopter while landing at Reagan Washingt

Published

on

www.youtube.com – KHOU 11 – 2025-01-29 21:36:49

SUMMARY: A rescue operation is underway after a CRJ700, operated by PSA as an American Eagle flight, collided with a military Blackhawk helicopter near the Potomac River, not far from Washington Reagan Airport. DC fire, police, and the Coast Guard are on the scene, with many emergency resources responding to the crash. The water temperature is 37°F, adding urgency to the search. The incident, which resembles a commercial airline crash, has led to a temporary closure of the airport. Authorities are focused on locating and rescuing potential survivors after this rare aviation emergency.

A search is on for any survivors after the regional jet crashed into a Black Hawk helicopter Wednesday.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending