Connect with us

The Center Square

Trump gains more ground in war against DEI | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Casey Harper – (The Center Square – ) 2025-02-15 10:49:00

(The Center Square) – A major shift is underway in the way large companies talk about and fund Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs.

President Donald Trump began the transition when he signed an executive order last month eliminating DEI policies and staff at the federal government and extending the anti-DEI policy to federal contractors.

Private companies, some of which had already begun the transition before Trump took office, remarkably began backing off their DEI policies, even if only symbolically with little internal change.

Costco resisted, pushing back on the Trump administration, but other major brands like Amazon Wal-Mart, Target, and Meta announced a pullback from DEI. Media reports indicated DEI discussions on earnings calls has plummeted.

Others, such as Wisconsin-based financial services company Fiserv, have not yet made a change, at least not publicly.

A murky legal future awaits companies willing to take the risk to stick with DEI policies, particularly in hiring.

Fiserv receives hundreds of millions of dollars in government contracts.

According to Fiserv’s website’s Diversity & Inclusion page, the company is “committed to promoting diversity and inclusion (D&I) across all levels of the organization, in our communities and throughout our industry.”

Fiserv says that it “partner[s] with people and organizations around the world to advance our D&I efforts and create opportunities for our employees, entrepreneurs around the world and the next generation of innovators.”

The company’s diversity and inclusion page includes a careers section that discusses “engaging diverse talent” and events to connect with “diverse candidates.”

Critics of DEI initiatives and policies say they discriminate against white men and Asians and lead to hiring and promotion decisions based on factors such as race and sexual orientation rather than merit.

In its 2023 Corporate Social Responsibility Report, the company boasted that “60% of director nominees for the 2024 annual meeting reflect gender or racial/ethnic diversity.”

According to an April 2024 report from Payments Dive, Fiserv was “buoyed by sales to government entities” in Q1 of 2024 and reported $500 million in revenue from those contracts. The U.S. Coast Guard contracted with Fiserv in 2024 to help with payroll, according to HigherGov, among other government contracts.

Fiserv did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

A watershed moment against DEI came when during the Biden administration, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against longstanding affirmative action policies at American universities, one key example of white and Asian Americans being discriminated against.

Trump’s election has only solidified the new legal framework for what is permissible when considering race and gender in hiring, promotion, and workplace etiquette.

From Trump’s order:

In the private sector, many corporations and universities use DEI as an excuse for biased and unlawful employment practices and illegal admissions preferences, ignoring the fact that DEI’s foundational rhetoric and ideas foster intergroup hostility and authoritarianism.

Billions of dollars are spent annually on DEI, but rather than reducing bias and promoting inclusion, DEI creates and then amplifies prejudicial hostility and exacerbates interpersonal conflict.

DEI has become increasingly controversial as activists use the moniker to advance every liberal policy on race and gender, often at taxpayer expense. In the federal government, DEI had become widespread and infiltrated into every part of governance, from racial quotas for promotions at the Pentagon to driving healthcare research at the National Institutes of Health.

At private companies, DEI policies guided investment decisions via ESG (Environmental, Social Governance) as well as personnel decisions with racial quotas for company board rooms. Those ideas are out of favor with the Trump administration.

Some of the companies resisting the shift from DEI could face legal action.

A coalition of state attorneys general sent a letter to Costco alleging it is violating the law, as The Center Square previously reported.

“Although Costco’s motto is ‘do the right thing,’ it appears that the company is doing the wrong thing – clinging to DEI policies that courts and businesses have rejected as illegal,” the letter said.

This week, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey filed a lawsuit against Starbucks for similar policies.

“By making employment decisions based on characteristics that have nothing to do with one’s ability to work well, Starbucks, for example, hires people by thumbing the scale based on at least one of Starbucks’ preferred immutable characteristics rather than an evaluation of an applicant’s merit and qualifications,” the lawsuit said. “Making hiring decision on non-merit considerations will skew the hiring pool towards people who are less qualified to perform their work, increasing costs for Missouri’s consumers.”

A 2022 Starbucks document touts a DEI goal: “By 2025, our goal is to achieve BIPOC representation of at least 30% at all corporate levels and at least 40% at all retail and manufacturing roles.”

Bailey called the Starbucks policies discriminatory and illegal.

“With Starbucks’ discriminatory patterns, practices, and policies, Missouri’s consumers are required to pay higher prices and wait longer for goods and services that could be provided for less had Starbucks employed the most qualified workers, regardless of their race, color, sex, or national origin,” Bailey said. “As Attorney General, I have a moral and legal obligation to protect Missourians from a company that actively engages in systemic race and sex discrimination. Racism has no place in Missouri. We’re filing suit to halt this blatant violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act in its tracks.”

The post Trump gains more ground in war against DEI | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

News from the South - Tennessee News Feed

Watson: Tennessee needs to be sensitive to federal changes | Tennessee

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Kim Jarrett | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-02-18 15:11:00

(The Center Square) – The Tennessee General Assembly is beginning to look at the state budget and what is going on in Washington needs to be considered, the chairman of the Senate Ways and Means Committee said Monday.

The committee reviewed the Tennessee 2024 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, which showed the state’s net position increased by $2.1 billion for fiscal year 2025. The increase was down from the previous year, when the position increased by $6 billion. 

The decrease was attributed in part to a reduction in federal dollars flowing through the state. 

Chairman Bo Watson, R-Hixson, said as the budget process moves forward, lawmakers need to keep an eye on what’s happening on the federal level. 

“This committee needs to be very sensitive to the changes in federal dollars that may or may not be coming into the state and in a number of budget hearings we are going to hear conversations about, ‘well we are going to have this money because we can match potential federal dollars,'” Watson said. “Well, with what all is going on in D.C. right now, whether those federal dollars are going to be there or not is at least open to conjecture at this point since we’ve seen a freeze on federal funding in a number of areas already.”

The Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency, also known as DOGE, is scrutinizing federal spending. 

Lawmakers are delving into Gov. Bill Lee’s $59.5 billion budget that includes $3.9 billion in new spending. The budget does not have any tax breaks. Both parties filed bills this session calling for the elimination of the grocery tax. 

The post Watson: Tennessee needs to be sensitive to federal changes | Tennessee appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

North Carolina bill reins in attorney general opposing presidential orders | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-02-18 14:51:00

(The Center Square) – Restricting the state’s attorney general from starting, joining or helping lawsuits challenging presidential executive orders is advancing in both chambers of the North Carolina General Assembly.

Democrat Jeff Jackson, a former member of the U.S. House of Representatives, linked the state with four cases in 21 days that opposed directives of second-term Republican President Donald Trump. Jackson and Trump each won close races Nov. 5 in a state with population of 11 million and voter registrations divided in thirds among those unaffiliated, Democrats and Republicans.

While the history of the past month is forefront, a law would potentially last beyond the respective politicians’ four-year terms. Republicans have majorities in both chambers of the Legislature, and have since 2010 midterms, but didn’t for the prior 140 years. Before Trump’s second win, Democrats occupied the White House for 12 of the last 16 years and 20 of the last 32.

AG/Restrict Challenge to Presidential EOs is Senate Bill 58 and House Bill 72. The lower chamber’s legislation last week was in the Committee on Federal Relations and American Indians Affairs and Monday was referred to both Judiciary 1 and to the Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House.

The Senate version awaits in the chamber’s rules committee.

At just 15 lines, the bill in elite brevity says, “The attorney general shall not, as a party, amicus, or any other participant in an action pending before a state or federal court in another state, advance any argument that would result in the invalidation of any statute enacted by the General Assembly or any executive order issued by the President of the United States.”

Enactment would be immediate upon becoming law. Republicans have majorities in both chambers, standing one member shy of veto-proof majority in the House should one come – as would be expected – from Democratic Gov. Josh Stein.

Jackson joined a birthright citizenship lawsuit filed by New Jersey Attorney General Mathew Platkin on Jan. 21. On Jan. 28 he joined New York Attorney General Letitia James in a suit involving the freeze of federal government grants and funding.

He’s also with a James litigation trying to block Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency from accessing Treasury Department records. On Feb. 10, he joined the suit of Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell that challenges the Trump administration of stopping cuts to medical research grants funded by the National Institutes of Health.

On Nov. 5 in North Carolina, Trump won his election over Democrat Kamala Harris by 183,048 votes of 5,699,141 cast. He won 78 of 100 counties. Jackson won his election that day over Republican Dan Bishop by 159,549 votes of 5,590,371 cast, scoring in urban areas while Bishop won 76 counties.

According to the State Board of Elections, as of Saturday, unaffiliated registrations are 37.5% of the more than 7.4 million. Democrats make up 30.9% and Republicans 30.5%.

The House bill has sponsorship from Republican Reps. Ben Moss of Richmond County, Keith Kidwell of Beaufort County, Wyatt Gable of Onslow County, Blair Eddins of Wilkes County, John Blust of Guilford County, Jake Johnson of Polk County, Jeffrey McNeely of Iredell County and Bill Ward of Gates County.

The upper chamber legislation has sponsorship from Republican Sens. Timothy Moffitt of Henderson County, Eddie Settle of Wilkes County, Bobby Hanig of Currituck County, Carl Ford of Rowan County, Ralph Hise of Mitchell County and Benton Sawrey of Johnston County.

The post North Carolina bill reins in attorney general opposing presidential orders | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Louisiana News Feed

Despite lucrative SEC membership, LSU athletics runs nearly $1M deficit | Louisiana

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Nolan McKendry | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-02-18 13:44:00

(The Center Square) − An audit of Louisiana State University’s athletic department found that the Southeastern Conference powerhouse operated at a deficit of nearly $1 million for the 2023-24 fiscal year.

LSU’s financial struggles are not unique among Louisiana’s public universities. The Center Square reported last week that five other institutions also faced deficits, with a combined shortfall of over $21.7 million.

According to the Louisiana Legislative Auditor’s report, LSU’s athletic department brought in $220.28 million in revenue but incurred $221.1 million in expenses, leaving a shortfall of approximately $818,000.

LSU’s top revenue sources included $51.78 million from ticket sales, $79.14 million in contributions — up $15.6 million from the previous year — and $43.62 million from media rights as part of the Southeastern Conference. Additionally, the program received $5.22 million in guarantees and $1.53 million in football bowl revenues.

On the expense side, the university spent $43.19 million on coaching salaries, benefits and bonuses, while support staff and administrative compensation totaled $38.06 million. Other operational costs accounted for $36.2 million, with an additional $2.07 million spent on football bowl-related expenses.

The audit also detailed capital asset activity for LSU’s athletic department, showing total capital assets valued at $320.39 million. After accounting for depreciation, the net value of these assets stood at $183.89 million.

The Tiger Athletic Foundation, a nonprofit organization that supports LSU athletics, reported net capital assets of $202.8 million.

LSU’s athletics department also carries a significant debt load. The university had $47.58 million in outstanding principal from a $102.37 million bond issuance. The department retired $3.41 million in principal this past year, while its interest obligations totaled $9.09 million.

January audits for other Louisiana universities revealed significant deficits as well.

Louisiana Tech University recorded the largest deficit at $10.5 million, with $33.37 million in expenses against $22.87 million in revenue. The school’s largest revenue sources included $6.77 million in institutional support and $5.03 million in contributions, while coaching salaries and athletic student aid made up a significant portion of its costs.

Similarly, Northwestern State University ran a $2.66 million deficit, while the University of Louisiana at Monroe faced a $4.49 million shortfall. McNeese State University and Nicholls State University posted deficits of $1.65 million and $1.69 million, respectively.

Each of these programs relies heavily on institutional support and student fees to balance their books.

The post Despite lucrative SEC membership, LSU athletics runs nearly $1M deficit | Louisiana appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Continue Reading

Trending