A Georgia mother whose five small children were taken from her after a traffic stop has alleged Tennessee Department of Children’s Services workers acted without a valid court order in violation of the law, new filings in a civil rights lawsuit said.
Bianca Clayborne filed suit last year on behalf of herself and her children, who were placed in foster care for 55 days following the February 2023 traffic stop in rural Tennessee.
Clayborne, her partner and their five children were on their way to a funeral in Chicago from their home in Atlanta when a Tennessee Highway Patrol officer pulled them over in Coffee County for tinted windows and a slowpoke violation, an incident report said.
Claiming to smell marijuana, troopers searched the car, finding fewer than five grams, according to the report.
Possession of small amounts of marijuana typically result in a paper citation in Tennessee. Instead, troopers arrested Clayborne’s partner, Deonte Williams, cited Clayborne and asked the mother to follow them in her car with her children to the Coffee County jail to bail Williams out. Williams admitted to the possession, but Clayborne denied she had used marijuana.
In the jailhouse parking lot, social workers confronted Clayborne in her car before forcibly taking away her children, who ranged in age at the time from a seven-year-old to a four-month-old breastfeeding baby.
Williams later pled guilty to a single simple possession charge. The charge against Clayborne was dismissed.
Now the ongoing lawsuit against those who participated in the children’s removal – among them Tennessee Highway Patrol troopers, Coffee County Sheriff’s deputies, and caseworkers with the Department of Children’s Services – makes a series of new allegations that the process used to remove the children violated the law – and that DCS and Coffee County officials destroyed evidence and created a false paper trail to cover their tracks.
“These public officials illegally tore apart and terrorized Clayborne’s family,” the lawsuit said. “They acted outrageously and unlawfully. Their actions caused severe emotional trauma to Clayborne and each of her five children.”
A spokesperson with the Tennessee Attorney General’s office, which is representing Department of Children Services caseworkers and THP troopers named in the lawsuit, did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday.
Attorneys representing Coffee County and its employees argued in legal filings that the new claims are barred by a statute of limitations. They did not respond to requests for comment by the Lookout on Wednesday.
‘Momma is not going to give them up without a fight’
Tennessee law requires that DCS workers seeking an emergency removal of children from their parents file a sworn petition in court that details evidence of children being abused or neglected. Then a juvenile judge must issue a written order before any efforts to separate children from their parents is carried out.
That didn’t happen in this case, the lawsuit alleges.
Instead, a DCS caseworker who had no first-hand contact with Clayborne or her children placed a call to Coffee County General Sessions Judge Greg Perry about the traffic stop — a call that was outside the formal legal process.
Coffee County officials separately contacted Perry to question whether they could legally separate Clayborne from her children.
At the time, Clayborne was parked in the Coffee County jail parking lot, where county sheriff deputies had placed spike strips around her car to prevent her from leaving – an illegal exercise of police power to detain an individual who was otherwise not under arrest, not subject to any court order and free to leave with her children, the lawsuit said.
“Well momma is not going to give them up without a fight,” Coffee County Sheriff Investigator James Sherrill told Judge Perry, according to a recording of the call obtained from the county by Clayborne’s attorneys.
“If we get in the middle of this, there’s going to be a damn lawsuit,” Sherrill said.
In response, Perry said officers could arrest Clayborne for disorderly conduct. And, the judge said, “you won’t get in a lawsuit…because I’ve got judicial immunity.”
Perry told Coffee County officials his verbal order to remove the children was enough.
Tennessee law does not recognize oral orders from judges to remove children from a parent’s custody, the lawsuit noted.
“Tennessee does not permit children to be taken from their parents based on a private telephone call to a judge,” legal filings said.
If we get in the middle of this, there’s going to be a damn lawsuit.
– Coffee County Sheriff Investigator James Sherrill
“Instead, when DCS believes a child should be removed from their home, DCS must file a proper petition and make factual allegations under oath to support the drastic relief of removing a child from their family — and the law requires that the removal can only happen after procuring a valid court order.”
Perry is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit, which nevertheless alleges he acted with “no lawful authority.”
Perry did not return a message left with his office seeking comment about the allegations.
Lawsuit alleges DCS effort to “paper over” the record
The children were taken from Clayborne’s side as she waited to bail Williams out of the county jail about six hours after the traffic stop.
It was sometime after the children were taken into state custody that a DCS attorney filed the necessary legal paperwork. The time stamp on the petition was obscured, a further step to hide that legal paperwork had been filed after the children had already been taken from their mother in violation of state law, the legal filings said.
“Presumably aware they had not followed any legal ‘process,’ the DCS Defendants immediately began to paper over the record to make it look like they had followed the law — when in fact they had not,” the suit said.
The same DCS attorney continued to communicate with the judge one-on-one about the case, despite standard court rules that bar communications about an active case that do not include all parties.
Weeks later, after the family’s then-attorney learned about the private communications between DCS and Perry, the DCS attorney and the judge engaged in a series of late-night texts after 11 p.m. to discuss how to avert a lawsuit, legal filings said.
The attorney, who is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit, was terminated by DCS in 2024 for her conduct in a separate case that involved helping a DCS caseworker submit a “sworn petition falsely alleging that a child was drug-exposed to justify” removal of that child, the filing said.
U.S. District Judge Clifton Corker has yet to rule on whether the new claims filed by Clayborne’s attorneys may go forward.
Corker ruled in August that DCS caseworkers can be held liable for their conduct in the case, including for claims they violated the family’s Fourth Amendment Constitutional protections against unlawful search and seizures and the family’s legal claims of false arrest and false imprisonment.
The new filings also seek to add additional DCS caseworkers and Coffee County officers involved in the incident whose identities were only made known to the family after the initial lawsuit was filed.
The family is represented by prominent Nashville civil rights attorneys Abby Rubenfeld, Tricia Herzfeld and Anthony Orlandi.
Tennessee Lookout is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Tennessee Lookout maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Holly McCall for questions: info@tennesseelookout.com.
SUMMARY: Rome Ramirez, former Sublime member, celebrates his solo debut with the single “Why Me.” The song reflects his 15-year journey with Sublime, flipping the negative question “Why me?” into a message of gratitude and perseverance. Written with close friend Chris Galbuta, the track showcases Ramirez’s personal growth. The debut single’s cover artwork features a young Ramirez with a Sublime poster, symbolizing his roots. Ramirez, now living in Nashville, is also gearing up for upcoming festivals, including Summerfest in Milwaukee, while releasing more music throughout the year. He remains grateful for his experiences with Sublime and his musical journey.
He is a multi-platinum singer and songwriter, and now He is debuting his solo career today on Local On 2! You know Rome Ramirez from his time as the front man of Sublime and Rome! Now he is stepping out on his own with his new song, “Why Me?”
www.thecentersquare.com – By Kim Jarrett | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-18 12:36:00
(The Center Square) – Tennessee’s revenues for March were $33.3 million less than the budgeted estimates, according to Department of Finance and Administration Commissioner Jim Bryson.
The $1.6 billion in collections is $69.3 million less than March 2024.
“Sales tax receipts, which reflect February’s consumer activity, were likely impacted by adverse weather conditions,” Bryson said. “Corporate tax collections came in slightly below target but remained largely in line with expectations.”
Fuel taxes exceeded budget expectations, increasing by $9.1 million, a 10.39% jump.
Corporate collections are down 13.9% when compared to March 2024, a difference of $44 million. Corporate tax revenues year-to-date are 9.65% below estimates and down 22% when compared to August 2023 to March 2024 numbers. The General Assembly passed a corporate franchise tax cut in 2024 that was estimated to cost the state $1.6 billion. Corporations started applying for the tax break in May 2024.
Bryson reported a decline of $35.4 million in general fund revenues for March.
“Although we fell short of our monthly target, year-to-date revenues remain just below forecast,” Bryson said. “We will continue to closely monitor economic indicators and revenue trends to maintain fiscal stability.”
March is the eighth month of the fiscal year 2024-2025 budget.
The General Assembly passed the $59.8 billion budget for fiscal year 2025-2026 earlier this week, which does not include any tax breaks.
Lawmakers from both parties raised concerns about possible federal budget cuts that could affect Tennessee. Sen. Bo Watson, R-Hixson, said when the budget process began in February that the state was already seeing a freeze in some programs.
House and Senate Democrats sent a letter to Bryson this week asking for more details on federal budget cuts.
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court announced Thursday it will hear oral arguments next month over President Donald Trump’s efforts to restructure birthright citizenship, though the justices won’t decide on the merits of the case just yet.
Instead, they will choose whether to leave in place nationwide injunctions from lower courts that so far have blocked the Trump administration from implementing the executive order.
The oral arguments, scheduled for May 15, will likely provide the first indication of whether any of the nine justices are interested in revisiting the Court’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868 following the Civil War.
The amendment states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
The Supreme Court ruled in 1898 in United States v. Wong Kim Ark that the 14th Amendment guarantees any child born in the United States is entitled to U.S. citizenship, even if their parents are not citizens.
Trump disagrees with that ruling and signed an executive order on his first day in office seeking to change which babies born in the United States become citizens. If that order were implemented, babies whose parents were “unlawfully present in the United States” or whose parents’ presence “was lawful but temporary” would not be eligible for citizenship.
Several organizations and Democratic attorneys general filed lawsuits seeking to block the executive order, leading to nationwide injunctions against its implementation.
Last month, the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to intervene in the lower court’s nationwide injunctions, limiting them to the organizations and states that filed suit.
The three cases are Trump v. State of Washington, Trump v. CASA, Inc. and Trump v. State of New Jersey.
Legislation
Nationwide injunctions by lower court judges have become an issue for Republicans in Congress as well as the Trump administration.
Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley introduced a bill in Congress that would bar federal district court judges from being able to implement nationwide injunctions.
“We all have to agree to give up the universal injunction as a weapon against policies we disagree with,” Grassley said during a hearing earlier this month. “The damage it causes to the judicial system and to our democracy is too great.”
Tennessee Lookout is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Tennessee Lookout maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Holly McCall for questions: info@tennesseelookout.com.
