Mississippi Today
Shortage of OB-GYNs is leaving Mississippi moms-to-be stranded for care
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74643/746431b31a2bb2a4493717b3593a1dcd7227a71d" alt=""
Kayla Dominick of Meridian knew something was not right – her periods were irregular and she felt constant pressure in her pelvis. She found a local OB-GYN who accepted Medicaid, and he performed an ultrasound of her uterus.
When it was recommended she undergo follow-up testing, including a uterine biopsy, she called the office to ask the doctor or nurse some questions and share concerns about the procedure. After leaving several messages and never hearing back, she decided to find another doctor.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86a47/86a4718e6c02faec302872c7350c081f9e8164e2" alt=""
But that didn’t prove simple: There are only 11 licensed OB-GYNs in Lauderdale County, home to Meridian, and its surrounding five counties, according to data from the Office of Mississippi Physician Workforce. Of those 11, only six reportedly practice obstetrics, or deliver babies.
At the same time, almost 28,000 women of reproductive age are living in that six-county area, according to U.S. Census data.
By comparison, in Rankin County, also home to about 28,000 women of reproductive age, there are 42 licensed OB-GYNs.
Mississippi as a whole is experiencing a shortage of these specialists. A recent WalletHub study ranked Mississippi as the worst state to have a baby. It came in 50th in the “midwives and OB-GYNs per capita” category, which it used data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics to determine. It also incorporated the state’s maternal and infant mortality rates – some of the worst in the nation – into the ranking.
More than half of Mississippi counties are considered maternity care deserts, or have no hospitals providing obstetric care, no OB-GYNs and no certified nurse midwives.
But the small number of OB-GYNs – particularly those still practicing obstetrics – in a metropolitan area like Meridian shows how tenuous the current workforce landscape is.
Dr. Norman Connell, market medical director for the OB Hospitalist Group and a Vicksburg-based OB-GYN, said about five years ago, the Meridian area had around 12 or 13 obstetric providers, most of them with privileges at both hospitals. Now, there are six providers on staff at both Ochsner Rush and Anderson Regional Medical Center.
In 2021, as a result of the drop in providers, both hospitals signed an agreement with Connell’s company to supply OB-GYN hospitalists, or providers from across the state, or even out of state, who work solely in an inpatient hospital setting.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f748/1f7489afa060b90fa916b318e0c475cdb772b36f" alt=""
“The population of Meridian didn’t shrink, but the area lost over half of the OB providers in a few short years,” Connell said.
Connell said the doctors at his company allow the local OB-GYNs to stay in their clinics more often and see patients they need to see.
“In addition to that, we’re also the doctor for patients who don’t have physicians on staff there … and for people who haven’t gotten prenatal care and show up with an obstetric problem,” he explained.
The group also has contracts with seven other hospitals all over the state, from Magnolia Regional Health Center in Corinth to Mississippi Baptist Medical Center in Jackson.
For Dominick, finding another doctor who accepts Medicaid and who would perform the procedure was a challenge – a surprising one for the native of New Orleans, where health care services are abundant.
“In the New Orleans area, we have an urgent care (clinic) on almost every corner, open 24/7,” she said of the abundance of health care services.
Dominick, like many other women in Meridian, took to a Facebook group for Meridian moms to ask for OB-GYN recommendations. There are several posts in the group from women looking for OB-GYN recommendations, either because they need a new one or because the one they’ve been seeing is too busy for routine appointments like check-ups.
“Best obgyns to go to im tired of waiting to get an appointment at my doctors office I shouldn’t have to sit there for three hours when there’s 3 people in the waiting room or waiting 6 months to even get in,” one woman wrote.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4a27/f4a275070f1c3092cc7e6c053134e8ad42829fbf" alt=""
Dominick eventually landed an appointment with Dr. Jennifer Nelson, who has been an OB-GYN in the area for more than 20 years. Nelson, however, recently quit practicing obstetrics after spending the prior two years on call at the hospital 24 nights a month.
Nelson was absolutely exhausted, scrambling from the hospital to the clinic and back.
She remembers one night when several other OB-GYNs at the hospital were out of town, and she was sick with the flu. She wound up working anyway.
Anywhere from 40% to more than 75% of OB-GYNs experience burnout, studies show – in the middle to upper one-third of medical specialties.
On top of the physical and mental burnout from around-the-clock work, she had many high-risk patients to see in her clinic – patients who required a lot of time, she said, and often with insurance that did not reimburse well. About half of her patients were on Medicaid, she said.
Medicaid payments for physician services are well below Medicare payments, which are below commercial insurance rates. Mississippi also has one of the lowest average commercial reimbursement rates for both inpatient and outpatient services in the nation, according to a Milliman white paper.
“It’s expensive to do OB here. I ran my numbers one month – if every one of my OB patients had been Medicaid … I would not have been able to pay my overhead with my nurses, and that’s with me working for free, totally taking my salary out of it,” she said. “I would have been about $100,000 short.”
In her clinic now, she treats Medicaid patients when they are referred to her clinic and, on a case-by-case basis, unreferred patients. She said because the clinic is not designated a “rural health clinic” by the federal government, Medicaid reimbursements for services are very low.
“The (gynecology) side is very low reimbursement for general services if you don’t have a rural health clinic designation,” she explained.
Further compounding the issue is how sick the patient population in the area – and across the state – is.
“We have the sickest patient population, so they’re litigious, time consuming – I did a lot of high-risk pregnancies. It’s a lot of coming up at two in the morning to check on people who are super sick,” she said.
Mississippi leads the nation in areas such as obesity, high blood pressure and diabetes – all conditions that make pregnancy more dangerous and require more time and services from OB-GYNs and other maternal health practitioners. These conditions often lead to worse outcomes for women and babies.
As OB-GYNs stop practicing or retire, both in Mississippi and nationwide, they aren’t being replaced at the same rate. And it’s unknown how last year’s Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v. Wade is affecting the OB-GYN workforce in Mississippi, though other states with similar restrictive abortion laws have seen providers leave because of enhanced legal risks.
Dr. Michelle Owens, a maternal fetal medicine specialist who worked at the University of Mississippi Medical Center for nearly 20 years, said she suspects because the state’s laws have always been so restrictive in regards to abortion, Dobbs is not having an immediate effect on providers who live here.
“I think if anything, if people are concerned about the restrictive nature of practice of obstetrics and gynecology as it pertains to terminations services, that it (Dobbs) would probably be more influential on preventing people who want to provide that care. Those people aren’t going to come here (to Mississippi),” she said.
In a state with such a severe shortage, one must consider the ramifications of that, she said.
“The more we say we're in favor of allowing or condoning government interference in exam rooms, we have to also recognize there are some unintended consequences to those decisions – they don’t just happen in a vacuum,” she said.
There’s currently only one OB-GYN residency program in the state at the University of Mississippi Medical Center, and the program graduates six residents each year. Of the most recent graduates, only two stayed in Mississippi – prior years’ numbers average about the same.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a6cf/9a6cf2757e838068bbb05cb85333d8389e2c1bd5" alt=""
On top of that, there have been changes in how OB-GYNs work over the last decade nationally. Traditionally OB-GYNs worked at private clinics and had privileges at hospitals. Now, however, many OB-GYNs are hospitalists, or OB-GYNs who work solely in the inpatient setting, according to Dr. Elizabeth Lutz, associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology and the residency program director at the University of Mississippi Medical Center.
And more OB-GYNs today wind up completing fellowships, or going into a subspecialty such as maternal fetal medicine.
“Nowadays, closer than 30 to 40% of OB-GYN residents go into fellowship – that’s grown dramatically,” said Lutz, associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology and the residency program director at the University of Mississippi Medical Center.
Both Ochsner Rush, where Nelson previously had privileges, and Anderson in Meridian began contracting with the OB Hospitalist Group in 2021 to fill in the gaps created by the shortage. About eight OB-GYNs from across the state – and even some from out of state – work shifts at both hospitals.
Anderson averages about 1,020 births per year, according to a hospital spokesperson. Ochsner Rush averages just under 1,000 births annually.
“Due to a shortage of OB-GYN’s in east central Mississippi, Anderson Regional Health System partners with a OB Hospitalist group to supplement our three practicing OB-GYN’s in providing 24-hour obstetrics coverage every day,” said Dr. Keith Everett, chief medical officer at Anderson Regional Health System.
Both hospitals also employ advanced practice nurses called certified nurse midwives – Ochsner Rush has four on staff – who manage the care of low-risk patients. The midwives are also skilled at counseling and education of patients in areas such as nutrition, childbirth preparation and breastfeeding.
The use of certified nurse midwives in Mississippi is rare: there are fewer than 30 in the state, and only a few hospitals, including the two in Meridian, allow them to deliver babies.
Connell said he thinks the company’s role in the area – and in the state – will only continue to grow.
“I think Meridian paints a picture of (why this work is important),” he said. “... It’s a work in progress. We’re at the very beginning of making things better.”
This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
Crooked Letter Sports Podcast
Podcast: Three Mississippi teams in the Top 25 D-1 Baseball poll
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93350/933502e7d2d5c65564f2f9afa0f04b06d9ba6fca" alt=""
Southern Miss and Ole Miss got some welcomed news as both joined Mississippi State, giving the Magnolia State three teams in this week;s college baseball poll. Otherwise, the college basketball grind continues and the best high school basketball teams converge on Jackson for the annual MHSAA boys and girls state tournament.
Stream all episodes here.
This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
Mississippi Today
As Congress moves toward potential Medicaid cuts, expansion grows more unlikely in Mississippi
As Congress moves toward potential Medicaid cuts, expansion grows more unlikely in Mississippi
Hundreds of thousands of poor, disabled or pregnant Mississippians could lose health care coverage if Congress slashes funding for Medicaid.
Although President Donald Trump has vowed Medicaid won’t be “touched,” the U.S. House of Representatives passed a budget resolution Tuesday that instructs the committee that oversees Medicaid and Medicare to cut $880 billion over 10 years. The cuts will help pay for Trump’s agenda on tax cuts and border reform.
The talk of such dramatic changes to the federal-state program has Mississippi lawmakers concerned – and hesitant to push expansion this year.
Proposals for Medicaid budget cuts nationwide include lowering the rate at which states are reimbursed for Medicaid services, capping the amount of money states can get per enrollee, and imposing block grants – meaning states would receive a fixed dollar amount for the program, regardless of need.
Mississippi, the poorest state in the nation, could suffer the most under some of these proposals, according to health policy experts.
Despite the state having some of the strictest eligibility requirements in the nation, pervasive poverty and poor social health determinants mean that more than 650,000 Mississippians – about half of whom are children – rely on the program for basic health care. More than half of births in Mississippi are funded by Medicaid.
“Mississippi has a relatively small population, with the lowest per capita annual income in the country, rates of chronic conditions that are consistently higher than the national average, and with around 60% of Mississippians living with multiple chronic conditions,” explained John Dillon Harris, a health care systems and policy consultant at the Center for Mississippi Health Policy. “… The result is a large Medicaid population that is very expensive to treat.”
Democratic lawmakers are also sounding the alarm about deep cuts to Medicaid. Rep. Omeria Scott, D-Laurel, said it’s something Mississippians “ought to really be afraid of.”
“If they are talking about cutting $880 billion out of the budget, Mississippi is going to be on its knees,” she said at the Democrats’ legislative press conference Tuesday.
However, since Mississippi is one of only 10 states not to expand Medicaid and draw down billions in additional federal funds, some proposed cuts wouldn’t directly affect the state’s current budget – though they would affect future enrollment.
“Mississippi isn’t drawing down as much, so that’s not going to be a direct cut to your current budget, but it’s an opportunity cost,” said Joan Alker, Medicaid expert and executive director of Georgetown University’s Center for Children and Families.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bbd6/7bbd6e4e7c897a957321f33de1936bef965f8823" alt=""
Threats to slash Medicaid spending have already scared away Mississippi lawmakers from attempting expansion this year – though they have passed “dummy bills,” void of details, to keep the issue alive “should something transpire,” House Speaker Jason White said.
After a decade of squelching any debate on the issue, Mississippi House GOP leaders in 2024 pushed for legislation that would expand Medicaid to 200,000 low-income adults, as 40 other states have done. While the bills died after a saga of partisan politics, advocates were hopeful that the historic session created enough momentum to get the policy through the finish line in 2025.
Now, lawmakers fear they may have bigger problems on their hands.
“Unfortunately, we’re hearing more about what may be cuts or block grants to the Medicaid program in general that we will have to deal with as a state because there’s no denying we have a large Medicaid population – so I don’t know the chances,” White said when asked about the likelihood Medicaid expansion would be brought up this year.
Others are more certain the issue is dead this year.
“In a most practical sense, I’d say we probably won’t be doing anything this year,” Senate Medicaid Chairman Kevin Blackwell told Mississippi Today, though he added that if anything changes, lawmakers could suspend the legislative rules and bring a bill back to life late in the session.
Click the dropdown to learn more about the specific proposals that would reduce Medicaid funding:
Reducing the federal match rate
The federal government could reduce the federal matching rate, or FMAP, which determines the percentage of Medicaid costs the federal government pays to each state. How much this would affect Mississippi would depend on the language of the proposed cut.
Mississippi currently has the highest FMAP in the country at 76.9% – meaning the federal government pays for nearly 80% of Mississippians’ Medicaid coverage, while the state makes up the rest – because of the state’s high poverty rate.
One of the proposals would take away the FMAP floor. As it stands, all states receive at least a 50% FMAP, even if they “should” be receiving less, according to the per capita income formula. If that floor was removed, richer states would be affected, as their FMAP would drop below 50%. Mississippi would likely not suffer from this proposal.
Another proposal would remove the increased federal match rate of 90% that the federal government offered to newly-expanded states in the last few years. Without the increased match rate, expansion would not hold the financial favor that has made it politically palatable to Republicans in the state.
Capping benefits per enrollee
The feds could also impose what’s called a “per capita cap,” limiting the amount a state could spend on Medicaid per person. If the caps were implemented, Medicaid would only receive a certain amount of money from the federal government to cover the care of a beneficiary – regardless of his or her medical needs. States would be locked into a fixed amount based on what they have historically spent.
The fact that Mississippi has one of the lowest per person Medicaid spending would count against the state – locking it into a lower fixed budget.
Alker, the Medicaid expert from Georgetown University, says pushing expansion legislation through this year could make Mississippi more likely to receive a higher per capita budget – though it’s no guarantee.
“I’ve seen proposals that look at taking away the American Rescue Plan Act incentives, which is extra funding for states that newly come to expansion … I have seen some chatter about how one proposal is to take away those incentives, but to not take them away from states that were counting on them,” explained Alker.
“In other words, sort of grandfathering in North Carolina and South Dakota (states that expanded Medicaid in the past two years). So, if anything, it might be smart for Mississippi to do the expansion this session and lock that in.”
Imposing a block grant
Imposing block grants would be similar to per capita caps, but arguably more punishing for states since funding wouldn’t change based on enrollment growth.
Block grants would limit states’ abilities to respond to emergencies, and would especially hurt rural areas, research says.
Limiting provider tax
Mississippi is currently almost maxed out on the tax it’s allowed to impose on hospitals, which helps the state pay for its share of Medicaid spending. One option being discussed in Congress is to lower the limit of or eliminate the tax, which would mean hospitals would be reimbursed at a lower rate and there would be less state money to fund the Medicaid program.
The proposal is less likely to garner support, explained Harris, the policy consultant at the Center for Mississippi Health Policy.
“It’ll be difficult to move this particular reform through Congress since such a large number of states, both red and blue, rely on this tax to pay for their programs,” he said.
But if it did go into effect, the impact would be profound.
“The state would have to get really creative in figuring out what to tax and how in order to maintain the current level of support hospitals receive through these supplemental payments,” Harris said.
Imposing work requirements
Work requirements have long been discussed as a means of making Medicaid expansion more palatable to conservatives who view the program as “welfare.” Now, Congress may decide to impose work requirements on the regular Medicaid population.
As it stands, Mississippi has one of the country’s strictest income requirements for Medicaid. Childless adults don’t qualify, and parents must make less than 28% of the federal poverty level, a mere $7,000 annually for a family of three, to qualify. More times than not, that means that working a full-time job counts against an individual.
If the state were to keep its strict income requirements while also imposing a work requirement, it would be difficult for Mississippians to qualify for the health care program.
The red tape that a work requirement would create would also likely deter eligible Mississippians from enrolling or staying on the program.
Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann said Mississippi lawmakers have “a leg up” since the state’s former Medicaid director recently landed a spot in Washington leading the federal Medicaid division under Trump. Hosemann has yet to say what, if anything, Snyder has told lawmakers so far, but said he expects to have “a direct commentary into the area of Medicaid” through Snyder.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/551bb/551bb6fb5658c943e073383d45d8e5d3927281e6" alt=""
Regardless of what action the federal government decides to take, cuts of this magnitude would affect millions of low-income people across the country, not just in Mississippi.
“States will be forced to deeply cut eligibility, benefits and reduce provider rates,” Alker said in a statement published online in response to the House budget resolution outlining Medicaid costs. “These cuts will especially harm rural communities who are more reliant on Medicaid, and where hospitals are already operating on tighter margins.”
Taylor Vance, Geoff Pender and Michael Goldberg contributed to this report.
Mississippi Today receives grant support from The Bower Foundation, as does the Center for Mississippi Health Policy. Donors do not in any way influence our newsroom’s editorial decisions. For more on that policy or to view a list of our donors, click here.
This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
Mississippi Today
On this day in 1870
On this day in 1870
Feb. 26, 1870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f459/1f4596f20e2d7fffa8caede2d8329ebbdd718400" alt=""
Wyatt Outlaw, a Union veteran and the first Black town commissioner of Graham, North Carolina, was seized from his home and lynched by members of the Ku Klux Klan known as the White Brotherhood, which controlled the county.
Outlaw served as president of the Alamance County Union League of America, which opposed the White Brotherhood and had advocated establishing a school for Black students — something Klansmen had vowed to burn down.
When the Klan tried to terrorize the town’s Black citizens, Outlaw and two other Black constables opened fire on the hooded men. Sometime later, more than 60 hooded Klansmen invaded his home with torches, swords and pistols. They beat down Outlaw’s door with axes.
When his 73-year-old mother confronted them, they knocked her down and kicked and stomped her. As the mob dragged Outlaw away, his 6-year-old son screamed, “Oh, Daddy! Oh, Daddy!”
The Klansmen walked Outlaw bare-chested and barefoot to the Alamance County Courthouse, where they lynched him and placed a note on his chest: “Beware! Ye guilty parties — both white and black.”
Eighteen Klansmen were indicted for Outlaw’s murder, but charges were later dropped. Other Klan violence led to other deaths and injuries. Outlaw’s lynching, followed by the assassination of state Sen. John W. Stephens at the Caswell County Courthouse, prompted Gov. William Woods Holden to declare martial law in the area. As a result of his stand, the governor was impeached.
Decades later, in 1914, officials gathered to commemorate a new Confederate monument. Jacob Long, a longtime lawmaker, praised “the achievements of the great and good of our own race and blood” just steps from where he and other Klansmen reportedly lynched Outlaw. The monument still stands.
There is no monument to honor Outlaw. A play telling his story debuted in nearby Burlington in 2016.
This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
-
News from the South - Louisiana News Feed5 days ago
Jeff Landry’s budget includes cuts to Louisiana’s domestic violence shelter funding
-
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed5 days ago
Bills from NC lawmakers expand gun rights, limit cellphone use
-
News from the South - West Virginia News Feed2 days ago
‘What’s next?’: West Virginia native loses dream job during National Park Service terminations
-
News from the South - Texas News Feed6 days ago
ICE charges Texas bakery owners with harboring immigrants
-
Mississippi Today5 days ago
Forty years after health official scaled fence in Jackson to save malnourished personal care home residents, unchecked horrors remain
-
News from the South - Missouri News Feed7 days ago
Interstate 44 reopens following mass traffic
-
News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed5 days ago
Oklahoma City FAA workers axed in federal layoffs feel betrayed, concerned by rhetoric
-
Kaiser Health News7 days ago
An Ice Rink To Fight Opioid Crisis: Drug-Free Fun vs. Misuse of Settlement Cash