SUMMARY: Roadwork near the Trafalgar entrance of Jazz Fest has created a large hole and hazardous conditions, raising concerns for local residents like Darren Furman. As parking permits around their homes are now uncertain, Furman worries about the safety of festival-goers amidst increased traffic and newly installed no parking signs. The city’s Sewage and Water Board identified further sewer issues while addressing the water leak. Though temporary asphalt has been laid, permanent repairs will follow later, leaving many uncertain about the situation’s impact on parking and pedestrian safety during the festivities.

Road Patrol: Hole on Trafalgar St could interrupt Jazz Fest parking

Subscribe to WDSU on YouTube now for more: http://bit.ly/1n00vnY

Get more New Orleans news: http://www.wdsu.com
Like us: http://www.facebook.com/wdsutv
Follow us: http://twitter.com/wdsu
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/wdsu6/

Source

SUMMARY: The 2025 Talladega Superspeedway event kicks off April 25th in Alabama, with NASCAR fans anticipating an exciting weekend. The Jack Links 500 on Sunday will feature a special tribute to NASCAR icon Bobby Allison, who passed away in November 2024. His grandson, Robbie, will honor him by driving a 1969 Mercury Cyclone, the car Allison won with at Talladega in 1971. Drivers are preparing for the notorious high-speed risks of the track, where large crashes are common. Talladega’s steep turns and intense speed make it a race where fortune plays a key role.

FOX 14 Your Morning News: 2025 Talladega Superspeedway to kick off on April 25th

Source

by Ashley Murray, Louisiana Illuminator
April 24, 2025

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court Thursday to block a lower court’s decision allowing transgender individuals to continue enlisting and serving in the armed forces.

Administration officials are seeking a stay of a broad district court ruling in late March that applied to all troops rather than only to those who challenged President Donald Trump’s executive order in court. The U.S. Appeals Court for the 9th Circuit upheld the lower court’s ruling Friday.

The government contends its policy does not discriminate against an entire class of people, but rather finds a diagnosis or history of gender dysphoria to be disqualifying. Gender dysphoria is recognized by medical professionals as distress caused by an incongruence between a person’s gender identity and their sex at birth.

In its application to the Supreme Court Thursday afternoon, the Department of Justice argued it’s likely to succeed in the case because the newly adopted policy does not differ widely from those in place under former secretaries of defense.

“The policy was based in part on the findings of a panel of experts convened during the first Trump Administration, which found that service by individuals with gender dysphoria was contrary to ‘military effectiveness and lethality,’” wrote John Sauer, Trump’s solicitor general.

Sauer also argued the district court’s universal order violated the power of the president.

Trump issued an executive order on Jan. 27, asserting the “adoption of a gender identity inconsistent with an individual’s sex conflicts with a soldier’s commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even in one’s personal life.” Further, the order said that being transgender is “not consistent with the humility and selflessness required of a service member.”

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth issued the new policy a month later, reversing former President Joe Biden’s order allowing service members to transition and serve openly under their preferred gender identity.

Trump’s order immediately drew court challenges, including a separate case now in the U.S. Appeals Court for the District of Columbia.

A Department of Justice attorney arguing before the D.C. Circuit Tuesday alerted the judges that the administration would “imminently” appeal the 9th Circuit decision to the Supreme Court.

Lambda Legal and the Human Rights Foundation, who are representing plaintiffs in the 9th Circuit case, released a statement in response Tuesday asserting, “Transgender service members have been openly serving our country with honor and distinction for almost a decade and have met and are meeting every neutral service-based standard.”

“The U.S. Supreme Court should reject the invitation to stay the district court’s injunction so that they can impose their discriminatory ban while the litigation proceeds,” the statement said.

The administration’s emergency application to the high court Thursday is just the latest in the administration’s whack-a-mole battle against lower federal court rulings that have blocked White House actions, particularly on immigration.
 

Louisiana Illuminator is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Louisiana Illuminator maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Greg LaRose for questions: info@lailluminator.com.

The post Trump DOJ asks Supreme Court to reverse ruling allowing transgender troops appeared first on lailluminator.com

Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The content primarily discusses a legal matter related to the Trump administration’s policies regarding transgender individuals serving in the military. The coverage of legal opinions, court decisions, and statements from advocacy groups like Lambda Legal indicates a focus on social justice and rights, aligning with Center-Left values. The language around the discriminatory nature of Trump’s policies and the invocation of expert medical opinions reflects advocacy for broader inclusion and equality, which is characteristic of Center-Left discourse. Additionally, the framing of the Trump administration’s actions as a "battle" against lower court rulings suggests a critical stance that typically aligns with a Center-Left perspective. Overall, while the article provides factual updates, the emphasis on the implications of the policies and the criticism of the administration’s arguments indicate a lean towards a Center-Left viewpoint.