Connect with us

Kaiser Health News

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Is Wrong About a Ban on NIH Research About Mass Shootings

Published

on

Louis Jacobson, PolitiFact
Thu, 02 May 2024 09:00:00 +0000

“Congress prohibits the NIH from researching the cause of mass shootings.”

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in an April 21 post on X

The National Institutes of Health is the federal government’s main agency for supporting medical research. Is it barred from researching mass shootings? That’s what presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said recently.

Kennedy, whose statements about conspiracy theories earned him PolitiFact’s 2023 “Lie of the Year,” is running as an independent third-party candidate against President Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic candidate, and the presumptive Republican nominee, former President Donald Trump.

On April 21 on X, Kennedy flagged his recent interview with conservative commentator Glenn Beck, which touched on gun policy. Kennedy summarized his gun policy views in the post, writing, “The National Institutes of Health refuses to investigate the mystery; in fact, Congress prohibits the NIH from researching the cause of mass shootings. Under my administration, that rule ends — and our kids’ safety becomes a top priority.”

But this information is outdated.

In 1996, Congress passed the “Dickey Amendment,” an appropriations bill provision that federal officials widely interpreted as barring federally funded research related to gun violence (though some observers say this was a misinterpretation). Congress in 2018 clarified that the provision didn’t bar federally funded gun-related research, and funding for such efforts has been flowing since 2020.

Kennedy’s campaign did not provide evidence to support his statement.

What Was the Dickey Amendment?

After criticizing some federally funded research papers on firearms in the mid-1990s, pro-gun advocates, including the National Rifle Association, lobbied to halt federal government funding for gun violence research.

In 1996, Congress approved appropriations bill language saying that “none of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be used to advocate or promote gun control.” The language was named for one of its backers, Rep. Jay Dickey (R-Ark).

But the Dickey Amendment, as written, did not ban all gun-related research outright.

“Any honest research that was not rigged to produce results that helped promote gun control could be funded by CDC,” said Gary Kleck, a Florida State University criminologist. But CDC officials, experts said, interpreted the Dickey Amendment as banning all gun-related research funding.

This perception meant the amendment “had a chilling effect on funding for gun research,” said Allen Rostron, a University of Missouri-Kansas City law professor who has written about the amendment. Federal agencies “did not want to take a chance on funding research that might be seen as violating the restriction” and so “essentially were not funding research on gun violence.”

Also, the Dickey Amendment targeted only the CDC, not all other federal agencies. Congress expanded the restriction to cover NIH-funded research in 2011.

Although the Dickey Amendment didn’t bar gun-related research, federal decision-makers acted as though it did by not pursuing such research.

Moving Past the Dickey Amendment

Over time, critics of the gun industry made an issue of the Dickey Amendment and gathered congressional support to clarify the amendment.

In 2018, lawmakers approved language that said the amendment wasn’t a blanket ban on federally funded gun violence research. By 2020, federal research grants on firearms began to be issued again, starting with $25 million to be split between the CDC and NIH.

By now, the CDC and NIH are funding a “large portfolio” of firearm violence-related research, said Daniel Webster, a professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Also, the Justice Department’s National Institute of Justice has funded the largest study of mass shootings to date, Webster said, and is seeking applications for studies of mass shootings.

Our Ruling

Kennedy said, “Congress prohibits the NIH from researching the cause of mass shootings.”

Although the Dickey Amendment, a provision of appropriations law supported by the gun industry, didn’t prohibit all federally supported, gun-related research from 1996 to 2018, decision-makers acted as though it did.

However, in 2018, Congress clarified the provision’s language. And since 2020, CDC, NIH, and other federal agencies have funded millions of dollars in gun-related research, including studies on mass shootings.

We rate Kennedy’s statement False.

Our Sources

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. post on X, April 21, 2024

National Institutes of Health, “NIH Awards Additional Research and Training Grants to Support Firearm Injury and Mortality Prevention Science,” Sept. 20, 2023

National Institute of Justice, “Public Mass Shootings: Database Amasses Details of a Half Century of U.S. Mass Shootings with Firearms, Generating Psychosocial Histories,” Feb. 3, 2022

National Institute of Justice, “NIJ FY24 Research and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings,” Feb. 5, 2024

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Funded Research,” accessed April 22, 2024

American Psychological Association, “A Thaw in the Freeze on Federal Funding for Gun Violence and Injury Prevention Research,” April 1, 2021

Allen Rostron, “The Dickey Amendment on Federal Funding for Research on Gun Violence: A Legal Dissection” (American Journal of Public Health), July 2018

Email interview with Gary Kleck, a Florida State University criminologist, April 22, 2024

Email interview with Daniel W. Webster, professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, April 22, 2024

Email interview with Jaclyn Schildkraut, executive director of the Regional Gun Violence Research Consortium at the Rockefeller Institute of Government, April 22, 2024

Email interview with Mike Lawlor, University of New Haven criminologist, April 22, 2024

Email interview with Allen Rostron, University of Missouri-Kansas City law professor, April 22, 2024

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

USE OUR CONTENT

This story can be republished for free (details).

——————————
By: Louis Jacobson, PolitiFact
Title: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Is Wrong About a Ban on NIH Research About Mass Shootings
Sourced From: kffhealthnews.org/news/article/fact-check-rfk-jr-wrong-nih-research-mass-shootings-gun-control-dickey-amendment/
Published Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 09:00:00 +0000

Did you miss our previous article…
https://www.biloxinewsevents.com/breaking-a-promise-california-deficit-could-halt-raises-for-disability-workers/

Kaiser Health News

A Program To Close Insurance Gaps for Native Americans Has Gone Largely Unused

Published

on

kffhealthnews.org – Jazmin Orozco Rodriguez – 2025-01-24 04:00:00

SUMMARY: Dale Rice, 62, lost a toe to infection and accrued over $20,000 in hospital debt while uninsured. Living far from his tribe’s health resources, he struggled to access specialty care under the federal Indian Health Service. A new tribal sponsorship program in Nevada aims to address this gap by allowing tribes to purchase health insurance through the state’s Affordable Care Act marketplace. This initiative increases access to coverage for Native Americans and reduces financial burdens associated with uninsured care. While successful in providing assistance, concerns over expiring tax credits could jeopardize ongoing support for these programs, impacting health access further.

Read the full article

The post A Program To Close Insurance Gaps for Native Americans Has Gone Largely Unused appeared first on kffhealthnews.org

Continue Reading

Kaiser Health News

Hospitales dicen que no rechazarán pacientes, mientras los estados se posicionan sobre inmigración

Published

on

kffhealthnews.org – Vanessa G. Sánchez and Daniel Chang – 2025-01-23 09:53:00

SUMMARY: California está aconsejando a los proveedores de atención médica que no incluyan el estatus migratorio de los pacientes en registros y facturas, mientras que Florida y Texas exigen que se reporte. Trump ha declarado una emergencia en la frontera y ha anulado políticas que protegen a indocumentados cerca de lugares sensibles, lo que ha generado miedo en la comunidad inmigrante y ha incrementado la reluctancia a buscar atención médica. A pesar de las disparidades en las políticas estatales, los hospitales afirman que no denegarán atención por el estatus migratorio de los pacientes, buscando garantizar su privacidad y acceso a servicios esenciales.

Read the full article

The post Hospitales dicen que no rechazarán pacientes, mientras los estados se posicionan sobre inmigración appeared first on kffhealthnews.org

Continue Reading

Kaiser Health News

As States Diverge on Immigration, Hospitals Say They Won’t Turn Patients Away

Published

on

kffhealthnews.org – Vanessa G. Sánchez and Daniel Chang – 2025-01-23 04:00:00

SUMMARY: California is advising healthcare providers to avoid recording patients’ immigration status, while Florida and Texas require facilities to assess patients’ status and track costs associated with undocumented immigrants. Trump initiated a national emergency at the U.S.-Mexico border, escalating immigration enforcement actions that have led to arrests at healthcare facilities. Despite varying state guidelines regarding patient treatment based on immigration status, hospitals emphasize that no one will be denied care. A significant percentage of noncitizens report hesitancy to seek medical attention due to fears of immigration enforcement, impacting overall public health and access to essential services.

Read the full article

The post As States Diverge on Immigration, Hospitals Say They Won’t Turn Patients Away appeared first on kffhealthnews.org

Continue Reading

Trending