Connect with us

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Public Education Bills: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Published

on

www.texasobserver.org – Josephine Lee – 2025-01-28 07:20:00

In recent years, Texas public education has become a battleground for right-wing ideologues aiming to embed Christian nationalist values in the classroom and to defund or privatize the state’s public schools, which currently serve about 5.5 million students. This 89th Legislative Session is no different. 

After spending more than $8 million on last year’s House primaries to oust anti-voucher Republicans, Governor Greg Abbott appears confident that school vouchers will pass. But the bipartisan election of Republican House Speaker Dustin Burrows over hard-right opponent David Cook may throw a wrench into the education agenda of conservatives, who have already filed hundreds of bills targeting the school finance system, LGBTQ+ students, undocumented immigrant children, and more. 


School Finance

In 2023, Abbott sat on a $33 billion surplus without increasing state aid to schools, in a failed bid to tie funding to the passage of a school voucher program. There is now a projected $24 billion surplus for the next biennium that could be tapped. 

Facing record-high inflation rates and no increase in per-student funding since 2019, Texas public school districts have been cutting staff and services and closing schools

In response, Democrats have filed several bills proposing to increase per-student funding. Democratic Representative Vikki Goodwin’ House Bill 1770 would raise the amount from $6,160 to $7,500 next year, adjusting annually with inflation. 

Other bills tying school funding to student enrollment instead of attendance, which has been less consistent since the COVID-19 pandemic, may also stabilize school districts’ finances. Democratic Representative Gina Hinojosa’s HB 1157 would use student enrollment to determine school funding as well as special program support—and limit the student-to-teacher ratio. 

Meanwhile, some GOP bills threaten to dismantle the main source of public school funding: property taxes. 

Since 2019, when the Legislature passed a school property tax compression bill, the state has cut the rate of property taxes that school districts receive, known as the M&O tax (for school maintenance and operations). Senate Bill 2, approved in 2023, also advanced $18.6 billion in property tax cuts without providing additional funding for schools. 

Some new GOP bills threaten to either deepen those cuts or eliminate school property taxes altogether, like HB 960 or HB 165 filed by Republican representatives Steve Toth and Cody Vasut, respectively. 

Other Democratic and Republican legislators have proposed bills to offset current or future property tax cuts by tapping the state’s surplus revenue for schools. But some legislators, like Democratic Senator Nathan Johnson, don’t see this as a long-term solution. “Historically, Texas has surpluses and deficits. If we hit a deficit in two, four, or six years, and we have these very large mandatory contributions from the state to school systems in lieu of local property tax dollars, the state could respond by cutting funding for public schools when there’s not enough money,” Johnson told the Texas Observer

School Vouchers

In 2023, 21 House Republicans joined Democrats to strip approval of a voucher program, which would entitle students to receive public dollars to attend private schools, from the public school funding omnibus HB 1. Today, only seven of those Republicans remain. A bipartisan group recently elected Dustin Burrows as House Speaker, even though Burrows endorsed school vouchers. Passage of some kind of voucher program seems assured in both chambers, which have already set aside $1 billion in initial budget planning to create it.

Republican Representative Matt Shaheen filed HB 612 in the House, which resembles a bill that failed in 2023. Senate Republicans filed a similar bill, SB 2, and will hear public testimony Tuesday. 

Neither bill limits the amount of general revenue that could be tapped to fund the program nor on the number of students who can receive vouchers. Nor would the bills set minimum financial or academic accountability standards for private schools who receive the funding. SB 2 does require private school students who receive vouchers to take standardized tests, but it does not require the state to monitor their academic achievement. SB 2 would offer $10,000 to students for private school tuition and lesser amounts to students who hire a private tutor. While proponents have argued that a voucher program would be created by tapping the general revenue fund instead of the Foundation School Program that funds public schools, opponents have warned that districts would lose funding anyway since public schools receive money based on student attendance, which would decrease if school vouchers pass. An intermediary “educational service organization” could collect a percentage of appropriated funds (5 percent under HB 612, 3 percent under SB 2) to manage the program. Under Shaheen’s version, individuals could also receive a tax credit if they contribute to the program, further reducing the state revenue available for public schools and other services. 

Unlike past proposals, both bills limit eligibility to children who previously attended public school or are entering kindergarten. But legislators, like Republican Representative Drew Darby, have warned that similar restrictions were quickly removed in other states’ voucher programs. “Once you have a program, they [the guardrails] will be removed, and the program will expand,” Darby said in an interview with WFAA ABC News. 

Culture Wars

Attacks on Texas public schools’ marginalized students do not seem to be relenting this legislative session. 

Under the guise of expanding parental rights, Republican Senator Bob Hall filed SB 86, which would require school district employees to inform parents if their student requests to use different pronouns or identify as transgender. The bill also mandates districts to request parental consent for students to participate in LGBTQ+ student clubs and prohibits instruction on gender identity or sexual orientation. Hall’s proposal mirrors a Katy Independent School District policy passed in 2023, which requires employees to report a student’s preferred pronoun to parents. (The U.S. Department of Education later opened a Title IX gender harassment investigation, and some Katy ISD students reported feeling less safe.) 

Under SB 86, parents could sue school districts for violating parental rights under the Texas Education Code. Republican Representative Jared Patterson’s HB 284 similarly aims to expand parental rights by establishing a state ombudsman for parents who wish to file a complaint against a school district, its employees, the state education agency, or the State Board of Education. 

Republican Representative Ben Bumgarner is reviving efforts to deny undocumented immigrant children access to public education. Like its previous iterations, HB 371 would require students to provide proof of citizenship or legal status to enroll in public schools. Districts would be compelled to report children who do not meet these requirements to the state. Previous efforts have been a non-starter because such a law is likely unconstitutional

School Safety and Discipline

School safety and discipline bills filed this legislative session appear to be moving away from punitive zero-tolerance policies, which public school advocates say have failed to make schools safer.

SB 570, a bipartisan proposal, aims to reduce truancy by calling upon district officials to conduct home visits and identify additional services for affected students. Senator Johnson filed SB 559 to reduce the state’s student-to-school counselor ratio, and Democratic Representative John Bucy’s HB 458 would offer alternatives to suspensions for students below sixth grade receiving special education services. 

HB 3, which passed in 2023, requires armed guards on every campus, but it did not provide funding. Republican Senator Joan Huffman filed SB 260 which would double the per-student and per-campus safety allotments. Democratic Senator Royce West has filed a similar bill, SB 598, which would increase the per-student safety allotment from $10 to $100 and the campus allotment from $15,000 to $60,000. In comparison, Representative Toth’s HB 1010 proposes punitive measures to enforce HB 3. Under his bill, if school districts fail to comply with safety and security requirements, the commissioner can assign a conservator to oversee the district. 

Charter Schools

State funds to charter schools have nearly quadrupled since 2010, when the state education commissioner became empowered to expand charter school’s campuses, without input from the public or elected officials, once the entity had been greenlit by the State Board of Education. Texas charter schools receive 20 percent of state public school dollars but enroll only 8 percent of all Texas public school students, according to a 2024 Legislative Budget Board analysis. Texas Democrats have filed multiple bills this legislative session to rein in the expansion of charter schools. 

Democratic Representative Terry Canales’s HB 1693 would require a state auditor to review open-enrollment charter schools receiving more than $100 million in state revenue. And Democratic Senators Borris Miles, Roland Guttierez, and José Menéndez filed SB 285 prohibiting a charter organization from using state funds to bankroll charter schools outside Texas. The bill follows stories by Spectrum News and the Texas Observer about the out-of-state financial transfers, and financial operations and reporting, of a charter school nonprofit formerly run by Houston Independent School District superintendent Mike Miles.

Democrats have filed several bills to curb charter school expansion. Senator West’s SB 605 would prohibit the approval of a charter’s expansion if it doesn’t meet accreditation, academic, and financial accountability standards, or if it is subjected to disciplinary actions by the education commissioner. Representative Diego Bernal’s HB 756 would allow the education commissioner to approve expansions only under certain conditions and only once each biennium. 

Standardized Testing

Republican Representative Brooks Landgraf is responding to years of protests against high-stakes testing by parents and teachers. HB 221 does not eliminate high-stakes testing, but it would require end-of-course state testing “only as necessary to comply” with federal law. That would mean eliminating the Algebra I, biology, English I and English II, and US History state tests for middle and high school students. 

SIGN UP FOR TEXAS OBSERVER EMAILS

Get our latest in-depth reporting straight to your inbox.


The post Public Education Bills: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly appeared first on The Texas Observer.

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Nearly 30 bodies found in deadly D.C. plane crash found as rescue efforts shift to recovery

Published

on

www.youtube.com – KPRC 2 Click2Houston – 2025-01-30 09:39:05

SUMMARY: A tragic midair collision between a passenger plane and an army helicopter near Reagan National Airport, Washington, D.C., has resulted in the recovery of at least 28 bodies. Recovery efforts, complicated by icy waters, strong winds, and upcoming bad weather, are expected to take several days. The American Airlines flight had 60 passengers and four crew members, including world champion figure skaters returning from a competition. The military aircraft was a Blackhawk helicopter with three soldiers aboard. Investigators are expanding the crime scene as debris is found floating in the water, complicating recovery efforts further.

There were 60 passengers and four crew members on the American Airlines flight and three soldiers aboard a training flight on the Blackhawk helicopter. Investigators do not believe anyone survived the crash.

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

What we know about 64 victims of D.C. plane crash

Published

on

www.youtube.com – FOX 4 Dallas-Fort Worth – 2025-01-30 08:58:57


SUMMARY: A recovery effort is ongoing after an American Airlines jet collided with a Blackhawk helicopter near Reagan National Airport in Washington, D.C. The incident, which resulted in no survivors, occurred just before 9 p.m. and was captured on video. The jet, carrying 60 passengers and four crew members, had just switched to a smaller runway when it began to descend, leading to a rapid altitude loss. First responders have recovered 27 bodies from the river, while officials continue to search for other casualties. The tragedy involved athletes returning from the US figure skating championships, deeply affecting their families and the skating community.

We are learning more about some of the victims on board last night’s deadly plane crash in Washington D.C. Here’s what we know.

Subscribe to FOX 4: https://www.youtube.com/fox4news?sub_confirmation=1

Dallas news, weather, sports and traffic from KDFW FOX 4, serving Dallas-Fort Worth, North Texas and the state of Texas.

Download the FOX LOCAL app: fox4news.com/foxlocal

Watch FOX 4 Live: https://www.fox4news.com/live
Download the FOX 4 News App: https://www.fox4news.com/apps
Download the FOX 4 WAPP: https://www.fox4news.com/apps
Follow FOX 4 on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Fox4DFW/
Follow FOX 4 on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FOX4
Follow FOX 4 on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fox4news/
Subscribe to the FOX 4 newsletter: https://www.fox4news.com/newsletters

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Texas postpartum Medicaid extension slow to rollout

Published

on

feeds.texastribune.org – By Eleanor Klibanoff – 2025-01-30 05:00:00

Many new moms in Texas don’t know they qualify for a year of Medicaid, doctors say

Many new moms in Texas don’t know they qualify for a year of Medicaid, doctors say” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.


Almost all of the pregnant women Dr. Joshua Splinter sees at his rural East Texas practice are on Medicaid. For years, he would treat these patients during pregnancy, deliver their babies and then start the mad dash to squeeze in a follow-up visit before they lost insurance just eight weeks after giving birth.

This just didn’t work for him or his patients. He’d get someone on a treatment plan for a chronic condition, but then the hormone and weight changes after childbirth would require different interventions. He’d see early signs of postpartum depression or partner violence, and then lose contact with the patient once she lost insurance.

“These aren’t things where I start a medication and we’re done,” he said. “This requires close follow-up with continued treatment and non-medical intervention, and we can’t get that done in two months.”

So when the Texas Legislature voted to extend postpartum Medicaid to a full year in 2023, Splinter was ecstatic. This was going to be a “game changer” for his patients, he said.

But almost two years later, many of his patients and those like them across the state are still struggling to get the full range of health care they were promised. It took almost a year for the extended coverage to go into effect, leaving many of his patients in limbo, and even now, they’re still often falling through the cracks in Texas’ health care system.

The number of pregnant and postpartum Texans enrolled in Medicaid has almost doubled since before the pandemic, to more than 265,000. But many patients are unaware that they are still covered for an additional 10 months, according to a survey from Texans Care for Children, a health advocacy group. New moms report being unable to access the physical and mental health services covered by Medicaid, and doctors say changes are needed to ensure the workforce, reimbursement rates and coverage can keep up with a full year of need.

As the Legislature returns, Diana Forester, health policy director with Texans Care for Children, said there’s still much work to be done, such as increasing provider awareness and patient access, to ensure new moms are fully benefiting from this extended coverage.

“You can’t just turn on this extended coverage and expect that to be the end,” Forester said. “We as a state need to figure out what postpartum care looks like in Texas … Our leaders have an opportunity to make that work better for families, but it’s not there yet.”

How we got here

When Gov. Greg Abbott signed House Bill 12 into law in May 2023, Texas became the 41st state to extend postpartum Medicaid to 12 months. It was a victory years in the making, after several sessions of advocacy from health care providers, maternal health experts and moms themselves.

The state almost passed it in 2021, after the federal COVID relief package eased the way for states to get this extended coverage approved, but the Legislature instead passed a six-month extension that the federal government deemed “not approvable.”

But when the Legislature returned in 2023, Roe v. Wade had been overturned, abortion was virtually banned in Texas, and there was new momentum around bills to support pregnant women and families.

Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, a Republican from Brenham, carried the bill on the Senate side, and said at a hearing that extending coverage was about making sure “women who give birth to children in this pro-life environment are cared for … You cannot raise a child without being healthy.”

The bill passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, and Abbott signed it into law in May 2023. HHSC submitted the waiver request to the federal government, which approved it last January. The state began offering extended coverage March 1, 2024.

Awareness among doctors

After all that back and forth, half-steps and setbacks, many doctors were unaware that the extended coverage was actually in effect, Texans Care for Children found in its survey. Some doctors found out for the first time through their billing departments. Several said they wanted more outreach from the state health agency and the managed care organizations, like a flyer or training for doctors.

“The state could do a lot more in that area,” said Helen Kent Davis, a senior policy advisor to the Texas Academy of Family Physicians. “They’ve tried, to the extent that there’s funding for outreach, to get the word out, but there’s more to be done, for sure.”

In a statement, a spokesperson for Texas’ Health and Human Services Commission said they used a variety of approaches to inform the public about these changes, including calls and webinars, provider notices, posting information to their websites and working with managed care organizations to get the word out.

But knowledge gaps remain, Kent Davis said. As an example, she said pediatricians have not been educated on this change the way OB/GYNs and family physicians have. Since they’re seeing the baby regularly, these doctors could be a key ally in making sure the mom knows she still has coverage.

Doctors also report confusion about who is responsible for overseeing this year of health care. Texas Medicaid changed its policy to allow an OB/GYN to serve as a patient’s doctor for the whole year, but the survey found many doctors across specialties were not aware of that and, when asked, said they would prefer patients be handed off to a primary care provider.

“Patients have been seeing their obstetrician this whole time and the health care system is not good at handing them back to a primary care physician for the rest of that period,” Kent Davis said. “This is a significant culture shift for patients and providers.”

And with a shortage of primary care physicians, especially in rural areas, more coverage doesn’t automatically translate into more health care. One new mother in Mineral Wells told Texans Care for Children she would have to travel almost an hour to Fort Worth to see a primary care provider.

“Every day, I get really bad headaches… very bad headaches,” she said. “And it’s getting more consistent. I just deal with it.”

Awareness among patients

In a state where almost half of all pregnant women typically lost insurance two months after giving birth, convincing new moms that they can continue engaging with the health care system has been an uphill battle. Home-visiting nurses, community health workers and others who work closely with new moms report significant confusion and resistance from patients.

“They really had to talk their patients into accessing care, essentially, because they’re so used to not having coverage and so worried about the cost and having to absorb that personally,” Forester said.

It didn’t help matters that this extended coverage finally went into effect amid a historic fracture to the state’s Medicaid system. For three years during the pandemic, states kept everyone enrolled in Medicaid, but in spring 2023, were allowed to move people off their rolls.

Texas removed more people, including postpartum women, faster than any other state, against federal guidelines, The Texas Tribune and ProPublica found. The state required almost everyone to resubmit documents proving their eligibility, rather than relying on automatic approvals like other states. More than a million people lost coverage for bureaucratic reasons like failing to return a form. The state has acknowledged some errors, which they later fixed.

Amid this upheaval, Texas implemented the extended coverage, including reinstating women who lost Medicaid at two months but were still in their one-year postpartum period.

“It was really confusing for members who were like, ‘you terminated my Medicaid a month ago, I have the notice,’ and then they’re told that it’s being turned back on for a few more months,” Forester said. “And it’s really hard for a doctor to be able to educate their patients when it’s totally dependent on where they are in the postpartum period.”

Splinter said he’s had at least a dozen patients over the last year who had to call their managed care organization to get their coverage reinstated.

“I’m having to act a little like a social worker and educate the patient on who they need to call and what they need to say,” he said. As a family physician trained in high-risk pregnancies practicing in an underserved area, Splinter said, “there’s only so much of me to go around, especially if I have to spend more time on non-doctor work like this.”

A spokesperson for the state’s health agency said everyone who was enrolled in Medicaid or CHIP during their pregnancy were automatically reinstated for the remainder of their postpartum period. While some of this is naturally sorting itself out the longer the policy is in effect, Splinter said he was surprised at the work his patients had to do to get the coverage they qualified for.

“You’re leaving pregnant patients and new moms to fight up the chain and solve it themselves from the bottom” he said. “That just isn’t the right way to be doing this.”

More work to be done

As more new moms are able to take advantage of this extended coverage, doctors and advocates hope the health care system is able to meet their needs. In the short term, Splinter said, he’s hopeful that the state can proactively go back through its records and ensure women who qualify for this coverage are actually getting it.

In the long term, the state needs to address long-standing structural problems facing its health care system, like significant shortages in primary care and mental health providers. Advocates are pushing for increased reimbursement rates and reforms to the bureaucracy that providers must go through to accept Medicaid, to ensure doctors are willing to see these patients.

They also want Medicaid coverage to catch up to the extended time period women can receive these benefits.

For example, Texas Medicaid covers one postpartum depression screening, even though national groups recommend at least four, Kent Davis said. With an extra ten months of coverage, that’s a lot more touch points for doctors to be screening patients for mental health needs. She’d also like to see Medicaid cover lactation support among other needs that can emerge in the first 12 months postpartum.

“It takes a comprehensive strategy,” Kent Davis said. “Obviously the coverage issue was one part to address and, and we’re so happy that we were able to pass House Bill 12. But now that we have this coverage, what do we do to make sure women can get it?”

Disclosure: Texans Care for Children has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune’s journalism. Find a complete list of them here.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/01/30/texas-postpartum-medicaid-slow-rollout/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

Continue Reading

Trending