Mississippi Today
On Friday, he graduates from college. On Monday, he stands trial for attempted murder.

A 24-year-old former Ole Miss student accused of stabbing a Tennessee man in the neck in 2019 will graduate from another school days before his attempted murder trial begins.
Despite being indicted, New Albany resident Lane Mitchell was admitted to the university and attended between 2019 and 2020 before withdrawing over accusations he assaulted two women on campus, according to court records.
Mitchell went on to enroll at Mid-America Baptist Theological Seminary in Cordova, Tennessee, which has undergraduate and associate degree programs. The school will hold its graduation Friday — three days before Mitchell’s trial is set to begin May 8 in the Union County Circuit Court, according to court documents.
The 2019 victim, Russell Rogers, nearly bled out and required surgery to repair major blood vessels — the carotid artery, which supplies blood to the brain; the vertebral artery, which runs through the spine; and the jugular vein, which runs from the brain to the heart, according to court records.
As a result of the stabbing, he was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder and continues to experience symptoms.
“Although it has been more than three years since the near fatal stabbing, Russell has not fully recovered,” Rogers’ conservator, his father Robert Rogers, wrote in a 2022 court filing.
Meanwhile, Mitchell is looking beyond graduation. Court records say he has applied to the West Point Military Academy and U.S. Air Force Academy, with letters of support from Republican U.S. Rep. Trent Kelly and U.S. Sen. Roger Wicker.
A spokesperson for Mid-America Baptist Baptist Theological Seminary declined to comment Thursday about Mitchell and the case.
The 2019 stabbing and additional accusations of violence
On Feb. 9, 2019, Collierville resident Rogers went to New Albany’s Tallahatchie Gourmet, a restaurant where he had been a regular customer, according to court records.
Rogers had been at the restaurant for several hours when then-18-year-old Mitchell arrived.
Within an hour of his arrival, Mitchell took a knife from the bar, held it behind his back and walked toward Rogers and a female waitress, according to descriptions and still images from the restaurant included in court records. Once the waitress left, Mitchell approached the unarmed Rogers from behind and stabbed him three times in the neck.
The two men had not met prior to the stabbing, court records say.
In March 2019, a grand jury indicted Mitchell of attempted murder – an escalation from the aggravated assault and battery charge he was initially arrested on.
Later that year, Mitchell applied to Ole Miss and was accepted into the Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College. Several court filings by the prosecution say Mitchell was accused of assaulting two students in 2020 and was charged with assault and battery, harassment and alcohol consumption.
He withdrew about two weeks later on Feb. 28, according to court documents.
A spokesperson from Ole Miss declined to comment Tuesday about Mitchell and the case, citing the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act.
A copy of the university’s undergraduate application shared with Mississippi Today and confirmed by a spokesperson includes the following question: “Have you been convicted of a felony or do you currently have felony charges against you?”
A spokesperson did not respond to questions including whether failing to disclose a pending felony charge or conviction would disqualify a person from admission or if they could face consequences such as expulsion if the university learned after admission that the person did not disclose the information.
Similar questions were asked to a Mid-America Baptist Theological Seminary spokesperson, who directed the reporter to the seminary’s catalog, which includes its admissions policies. Applicants to all programs must authorize a criminal background check, according to the catalog.
The prosecution subpoenaed Mitchell’s conduct and disciplinary records from his time at Ole Miss to use as evidence. His defense team is asking the judge to exclude that information from trial, according to court records.
Assault allegations from Ole Miss were the focus of the prosecution’s request for the judge to revoke Mitchell’s $50,000 bond or set more restrictions to ensure public safety in February 2022, according to court records.
In that 2022 filing, the prosecution detailed how Mitchell had been drinking and allegedly tried to grab two female students he knew at the honors college formal.
The prosecution laid out what happened next: Weeks after the incident had been reported to university staff, Mitchell emailed Tracy Murry, director of the Office of Conflict Resolution and Student Conduct, asking if he could withdraw from the university to avoid charges, according to court documents.
“I would appreciate it if you could ask the other party if it would suit them to leave the charges unresolved as long as I withdrew,” Mitchell wrote in an email that is directly quoted and attached as an exhibit in the prosecution’s filing. “I am considering this option but I would like assurance that they would not press the issue if I withdrew.”
A university spokesperson did not respond to questions about Mitchell being able to withdraw without going through the conduct process.
In a recent filing, the defense described the Ole Miss incident as “an alcohol-induced incident” with a friend that is “quite a common occurrence amongst young college students.”
Victor Fleitas, a member of Mitchell’s defense team, said in an email he tends to avoid making comments out of court during a case and after.
But after receiving a request for comment from Mississippi Today last week, he raised concerns about how reporting could affect his client’s right to a fair trial and how the news organization accessed Mitchell’s educational records from Ole Miss. The email was shared with Judge Kent Smith and attorneys for the defense, prosecution and an attorney for Rogers’ conservator.
Mitchell’s defense team argues that the public – including Mississippi Today – should have never had access to Mitchell’s educational records, which are protected under FERPA, according to an April 28 motion for a protective order.
Those records, the defense argued, were meant to be filed under seal with the Union County Circuit Clerk’s office, but they were included in the public file, including on the Mississippi Electronic Courts system.
On Tuesday, Smith approved a protective order which orders Mitchell’s Ole Miss records to be sealed and attempts to prohibit anyone – including the media – who viewed the records from publishing the information or disclosing it. The judge’s order appears to violate First Amendment protections, the Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal reported on Thursday.
The judge also approved a gag order to prevent all parties, witnesses and attorneys from posting or commenting about the case on social media, traditional media or other forms of mass communication until the jury reaches a verdict.
“(I)t is apparent that someone is attempting to influence the outcome of this case by means of the presentation of admissible evidence at trial,” the defense wrote in its motion for a gag order. “This outside influence stands the real possibility of tainting the jury pool.”
Judge Smith has not issued orders for pending motions that would allow or dismiss the following:
- Designation of a psychologist who treated Mitchell as an expert to testify for the defense about his psychological profile.
- Exclusion of investigative records from Ole Miss and testimony from those involved.
He is set to rule on the remaining motions Friday at the Tippah County Circuit Court in Ripley.
Union County District Attorney Ben Creekmore declined to comment. His office handled Mitchell’s case until 2021, which is when it recused itself over conflict of interest. Although the DA’s office did not specify the conflict, Mitchell notes on his Facebook page that he was campaign manager for state Rep. Sam Creekmore IV, a Republican from New Albany, who is the district attorney’s brother.
This led to the Attorney General’s Office taking over the prosecution, and the current attorneys assigned to Mitchell’s case are Special Assistant Attorney General Jessica Malone and Assistant Attorney General Bilbo Mitchell. A spokesperson from the Attorney General’s Office said it does not comment on active cases.
Trial to feature video of stabbing and expert testimony
Video surveillance from the restaurant showing before, during and after the stabbing is expected to be used as evidence in trial. The defense tried to have the video excluded in favor of basing the timeline of events on witness statements, but the judge ruled the video was proper and admissible.
The prosecutors and defense have each secured experts to testify about different versions of what happened at Tallahatchie Gourmet in 2019, including what led to the stabbing and alleged attempted murder.
Defense expert Matthew Campbell, a retired FBI agent and an active shooter instructor, interviewed Mitchell, who said he stabbed Rogers because Mitchell believed the man had a gun and wanted to hurt Mitchell’s father, the restaurant’s bartender, and a female waitress. Campbell concluded that Rogers acted within reason and other rational people believed Rogers was going to commit a violent crime.
He provided a breakdown of “concerning behaviors” he observed Rogers exhibit in the video, which are based on a 2018 study by the FBI’s Behavioral Analysis Unit about pre-attack behaviors of active shooters. These behaviors included aggressive body language and putting his hands in his pockets.
“Lane did not believe he was intervening in a fist fight, he believed he was intervening in a gun fight,” Campbell wrote in the report.
Investigators found that Rogers did not have a gun on him the night of the stabbing, according to court records.
Mitchell’s fear was informed by growing up during an age of active shooters and drills practiced in school, Campbell wrote in his report.
Jennifer Coffindaffer, the prosecution’s expert, also worked for the FBI and as a firearms instructor for law enforcement and civilians.
Her expert testimony is meant to discuss the FBI study that is the foundation of the defense expert’s analysis and why active shooter protocols are not applicable in the case, according to court documents.
Coffindaffer reviewed video footage of the stabbing and didn’t see the same aggressive and threatening behaviors Campbell noted in his report that demonstrated that Rogers was an active shooter.
She also noted that Mitchell’s decision to stab Rogers doesn’t follow active shooter training responses taught to civilians, which generally advise people to run away and hide and to only take action against a shooter as a last resort.
Coffindaffer said there is no evidence of whether Mitchell attended active shooter training before the stabbing.
Mitchell avoided jail following his arrest
While individuals charged with a violent offense usually wind up in jail, Mitchell instead was allowed to go to Lakeside Behavioral Health in Tennessee shortly after his arrest in 2019.
Half of a psychologist’s report in April looked at Mitchell’s mental health and evaluated him for conditions such as depression and anxiety while the other half was about his social history, including work history and achievements.
The report lists how Mitchell worked as a page in the Mississippi Capitol for Rep. Mac Huddelston, R-Pontotoc, for a week in February 2019 and as a page for Wicker in the U.S. Senate during the summer of 2018, according to court documents.
There were also mentions of 4-H membership, a gold medal from the Congressional Award Foundation and Eagle ranking with the Boy Scouts.
There has also been an ongoing fight for medical records for Rogers’ care after the stabbing and Mitchell’s ordered stay at Lakeside Behavioral Health.
The defense has been asking for Rogers’ post-care records from a 2018 federal civil lawsuit he filed against the restaurant and bartender Torrey Mitchell, Lane’s father, that was settled in 2020.
An order in the civil case prevented the records from being disclosed, but Judge Smith approved the release of Rogers’ medical records in February 2022, only to later vacate that order a few months later, according to court records.
The judge allowed the defense to subpoena some of Rogers’ medical records but denied prosecutors access to Mitchell’s records.
“The defendant wants to use privileged medical records of subsequent treatment of a condition he provoked as justification for stabbing [Rogers],” his conservator wrote in a June 2022 court filing opposing a subpoena.
In March, Judge Smith approved an order to protect information about any future treatment sought by Rogers, saying he understands how the ability to subpoena medical records could lead to a “chilling effect upon an individual seeking future treatment.”
At the same time, the defense has sought to keep out medical records for when Mitchell was ordered to be taken to Lakeside Behavioral Health.
Through a 2020 agreed order between the Union County District Attorney’s office and the defense, one of the conditions of bond was that Mitchell be taken to Lakeside Behavioral Health for counseling and remain there until medical professionals determined he could be released, according to court records.
This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
Did you miss our previous article…
https://www.biloxinewsevents.com/?p=239806
Mississippi Today
Early voting proposal killed on last day of Mississippi legislative session
Mississippi will remain one of only three states without no-excuse early voting or no-excuse absentee voting.
Senate leaders, on the last day of their regular 2025 session, decided not to send a bill to Gov. Tate Reeves that would have expanded pre-Election Day voting options. The governor has been vocally opposed to early voting in Mississippi, and would likely have vetoed the measure.
The House and Senate this week overwhelmingly voted for legislation that established a watered-down version of early voting. The proposal would have required voters to go to a circuit clerk’s office and verify their identity with a photo ID.
The proposal also listed broad excuses that would have allowed many voters an opportunity to cast early ballots.
The measure passed the House unanimously and the Senate approved it 42-7. However, Sen. Jeff Tate, a Republican from Meridian who strongly opposes early voting, held the bill on a procedural motion.
Senate Elections Chairman Jeremy England chose not to dispose of Tate’s motion on Thursday morning, the last day the Senate was in session. This killed the bill and prevented it from going to the governor.
England, a Republican from Vancleave, told reporters he decided to kill the legislation because he believed some of its language needed tweaking.
The other reality is that Republican Gov. Tate Reeves strongly opposes early voting proposals and even attacked England on social media for advancing the proposal out of the Senate chamber.
England said he received word “through some sources” that Reeves would veto the measure.
“I’m not done working on it, though,” England said.
Although Mississippi does not have no-excuse early voting or no-excuse absentee voting, it does have absentee voting.
To vote by absentee, a voter must meet one of around a dozen legal excuses, such as temporarily living outside of their county or being over 65. Mississippi law doesn’t allow people to vote by absentee purely out of convenience or choice.
Several conservative states, such as Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas and Florida, have an in-person early voting system. The Republican National Committee in 2023 urged Republican voters to cast an early ballot in states that have early voting procedures.
Yet some Republican leaders in Mississippi have ardently opposed early voting legislation over concerns that it undermines election security.
This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
.
Mississippi Today
Mississippi Legislature approves DEI ban after heated debate
Mississippi lawmakers have reached an agreement to ban diversity, equity and inclusion programs and a list of “divisive concepts” from public schools across the state education system, following the lead of numerous other Republican-controlled states and President Donald Trump’s administration.
House and Senate lawmakers approved a compromise bill in votes on Tuesday and Wednesday. It will likely head to Republican Gov. Tate Reeves for his signature after it clears a procedural motion.
The agreement between the Republican-dominated chambers followed hours of heated debate in which Democrats, almost all of whom are Black, excoriated the legislation as a setback in the long struggle to make Mississippi a fairer place for minorities. They also said the bill could bog universities down with costly legal fights and erode academic freedom.
Democratic Rep. Bryant Clark, who seldom addresses the entire House chamber from the podium during debates, rose to speak out against the bill on Tuesday. He is the son of the late Robert Clark, the first Black Mississippian elected to the state Legislature since the 1800s and the first Black Mississippian to serve as speaker pro tempore and preside over the House chamber since Reconstruction.
“We are better than this, and all of you know that we don’t need this with Mississippi history,” Clark said. “We should be the ones that say, ‘listen, we may be from Mississippi, we may have a dark past, but you know what, we’re going to be the first to stand up this time and say there is nothing wrong with DEI.'”
Legislative Republicans argued that the measure — which will apply to all public schools from the K-12 level through universities — will elevate merit in education and remove a list of so-called “divisive concepts” from academic settings. More broadly, conservative critics of DEI say the programs divide people into categories of victims and oppressors and infuse left-wing ideology into campus life.
“We are a diverse state. Nowhere in here are we trying to wipe that out,” said Republican Sen. Tyler McCaughn, one of the bill’s authors. “We’re just trying to change the focus back to that of excellence.”
The House and Senate initially passed proposals that differed in who they would impact, what activities they would regulate and how they aim to reshape the inner workings of the state’s education system. Some House leaders wanted the bill to be “semi-vague” in its language and wanted to create a process for withholding state funds based on complaints that almost anyone could lodge. The Senate wanted to pair a DEI ban with a task force to study inefficiencies in the higher education system, a provision the upper chamber later agreed to scrap.
The concepts that will be rooted out from curricula include the idea that gender identity can be a “subjective sense of self, disconnected from biological reality.” The move reflects another effort to align with the Trump administration, which has declared via executive order that there are only two sexes.
The House and Senate disagreed on how to enforce the measure but ultimately settled on an agreement that would empower students, parents of minor students, faculty members and contractors to sue schools for violating the law.
People could only sue after they go through an internal campus review process and a 25-day period when schools could fix the alleged violation. Republican Rep. Joey Hood, one of the House negotiators, said that was a compromise between the chambers. The House wanted to make it possible for almost anyone to file lawsuits over the DEI ban, while Senate negotiators initially bristled at the idea of fast-tracking internal campus disputes to the legal system.
The House ultimately held firm in its position to create a private cause of action, or the right to sue, but it agreed to give schools the ability to conduct an investigative process and potentially resolve the alleged violation before letting people sue in chancery courts.
“You have to go through the administrative process,” said Republican Sen. Nicole Boyd, one of the bill’s lead authors. “Because the whole idea is that, if there is a violation, the school needs to cure the violation. That’s what the purpose is. It’s not to create litigation, it’s to cure violations.”
If people disagree with the findings from that process, they could also ask the attorney general’s office to sue on their behalf.
Under the new law, Mississippi could withhold state funds from schools that don’t comply. Schools would be required to compile reports on all complaints filed in response to the new law.
Trump promised in his 2024 campaign to eliminate DEI in the federal government. One of the first executive orders he signed did that. Some Mississippi lawmakers introduced bills in the 2024 session to restrict DEI, but the proposals never made it out of committee. With the national headwinds at their backs and several other laws in Republican-led states to use as models, Mississippi lawmakers made plans to introduce anti-DEI legislation.
The policy debate also unfolded amid the early stages of a potential Republican primary matchup in the 2027 governor’s race between State Auditor Shad White and Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann. White, who has been one of the state’s loudest advocates for banning DEI, had branded Hosemann in the months before the 2025 session “DEI Delbert,” claiming the Senate leader has stood in the way of DEI restrictions passing the Legislature.
During the first Senate floor debate over the chamber’s DEI legislation during this year’s legislative session, Hosemann seemed to be conscious of these political attacks. He walked over to staff members and asked how many people were watching the debate live on YouTube.
As the DEI debate cleared one of its final hurdles Wednesday afternoon, the House and Senate remained at loggerheads over the state budget amid Republican infighting. It appeared likely the Legislature would end its session Wednesday or Thursday without passing a $7 billion budget to fund state agencies, potentially threatening a government shutdown.
“It is my understanding that we don’t have a budget and will likely leave here without a budget. But this piece of legislation …which I don’t think remedies any of Mississippi’s issues, this has become one of the top priorities that we had to get done,” said Democratic Sen. Rod Hickman. “I just want to say, if we put that much work into everything else we did, Mississippi might be a much better place.”
This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
Mississippi Today
House gives Senate 5 p.m. deadline to come to table, or legislative session ends with no state budget
The House on Wednesday attempted one final time to revive negotiations between it and the Senate over passing a state budget.
Otherwise, the two Republican-led chambers will likely end their session without funding government services for the next fiscal year and potentially jeopardize state agencies.
The House on Wednesday unanimously passed a measure to extend the legislative session and revive budget bills that had died on legislative deadlines last weekend.
House Speaker Jason White said he did not have any prior commitment that the Senate would agree to the proposal, but he wanted to extend one last offer to pass the budget. White, a Republican from West, said if he did not hear from the Senate by 5 p.m. on Wednesday, his chamber would end its regular session.
“The ball is in their court,” White said of the Senate. “Every indication has been that they would not agree to extend the deadlines for purposes of doing the budget. I don’t know why that is. We did it last year, and we’ve done it most years.”
But it did not appear likely Wednesday afternoon that the Senate would comply.
The Mississippi Legislature has not left Jackson without setting at least most of the state budget since 2009, when then Gov. Haley Barbour had to force them back to set one to avoid a government shutdown.
The House measure to extend the session is now before the Senate for consideration. To pass, it would require a two-thirds majority vote of senators. But that might prove impossible. Numerous senators on both sides of the aisle vowed to vote against extending the current session, and Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann who oversees the chamber said such an extension likely couldn’t pass.
Senate leadership seemed surprised at the news that the House passed the resolution to negotiate a budget, and several senators earlier on Wednesday made passing references to ending the session without passing a budget.
“We’ll look at it after it passes the full House,” Senate President Pro Tempore Dean Kirby said.
The House and Senate, each having a Republican supermajority, have fought over many issues since the legislative session began early January.
But the battle over a tax overhaul plan, including elimination of the state individual income tax, appeared to cause a major rift. Lawmakers did pass a tax overhaul, which the governor has signed into law, but Senate leaders cried foul over how it passed, with the House seizing on typos in the Senate’s proposal that accidentally resembled the House’s more aggressive elimination plan.
The Senate had urged caution in eliminating the income tax, and had economic growth triggers that would have likely phased in the elimination over many years. But the typos essentially negated the triggers, and the House and governor ran with it.
The two chambers have also recently fought over the budget. White said he communicated directly with Senate leaders that the House would stand firm on not passing a budget late in the session.
But Senate leaders said they had trouble getting the House to meet with them to haggle out the final budget.
On the normally scheduled “conference weekend” with a deadline to agree to a budget last Saturday, the House did not show, taking the weekend off. This angered Hosemann and the Senate. All the budget bills died, requiring a vote to extend the session, or the governor forcing them into a special session.
If the Legislature ends its regular session without adopting a budget, the only option to fund state agencies before their budgets expire on June 30 is for Gov. Tate Reeves to call lawmakers back into a special session later.
“There really isn’t any other option (than the governor calling a special session),” Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann previously said.
If Reeves calls a special session, he gets to set the Legislature’s agenda. A special session call gives an otherwise constitutionally weak Mississippi governor more power over the Legislature.
This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
-
Mississippi Today2 days ago
Pharmacy benefit manager reform likely dead
-
News from the South - Virginia News Feed6 days ago
Youngkin removes Ellis, appoints Cuccinelli to UVa board | Virginia
-
News from the South - Alabama News Feed6 days ago
University of Alabama student detained by ICE moved to Louisiana
-
News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed5 days ago
Tornado watch, severe thunderstorm warnings issued for Oklahoma
-
News from the South - Georgia News Feed5 days ago
Georgia road project forcing homeowners out | FOX 5 News
-
News from the South - West Virginia News Feed6 days ago
Hometown Hero | Restaurant owner serves up hope
-
News from the South - Georgia News Feed6 days ago
Budget cuts: Senior Citizens Inc. and other non-profits worry for the future
-
News from the South - Kentucky News Feed3 days ago
Tornado practically rips Bullitt County barn in half with man, several animals inside