Connect with us

The Center Square

Ninth Circuit: CA ban on standard-capacity gun magazines is constitutional | California

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Kenneth Schrupp – (The Center Square – ) 2025-03-20 18:45:00

(The Center Square) — The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled California’s ban on standard-capacity gun magazines is constitutional, overturning a lower court ruling

Citing New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that requires that gun control laws be consistent with the nation’s historical precedent of firearm regulation, District Court Judge Roger Benitez ruled the standard-capacity magazine ban unconstitutional in 2023. 

California Attorney General Rob Bonta appealed the ruling before it went into effect.

The Ninth Circuit majority opinion found that magazines, as “optional accessories,” are not protected firearms, or protected accessories under the Second Amendment. It also ruled the ban falls within the general precedent of “protecting innocent persons by prohibiting especially dangerous uses of weapons and by regulating components necessary to the firing of a firearm.”

Three judges dissented, finding the majority’s ruling inconsistent with Bruen and the Second Amendment.

“The majority’s rationale in this case, followed to its (il)logical conclusion, means that now — perhaps even more so than before Bruen — only the jankiest guns are even facially protected by the Second Amendment,” wrote Judge Lawrence VanDyke in dissent. “And even those can be banned outright consistent with the Second Amendment so long as the government can find a historical analogue with the flimsiest connection to the challenged law.”

“It sadly seems our court has somehow now established an even more government friendly version of the very interest balancing the Supreme Court rejected in Bruen,” continued VanDyke. “In doing so today, this court once again improves its undefeated record against the Second Amendment, demonstrating both its misunderstanding of firearms and its disdain for the People’s constitutional right to have them in the process.”

Bonta celebrated the decision, saying, “This commonsense restriction on how many rounds a gunman can fire before they must pause to reload has been identified as a critical intervention to limit a lone shooter’s capacity to turn shootings into mass casualty attacks.”

When providing historical precedent for Second Amendment restrictions to support California’s gun control laws, Bonta’s office has controversially cited bans on gun and ammunition possession by “Negros, Mulattos, slaves, or persons of color” and laws that “prohibited sales to Indians.” 

The post Ninth Circuit: CA ban on standard-capacity gun magazines is constitutional | California appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Three committees favorable on Senate’s two-year budget | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By David Beasley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-15 15:45:00

(The Center Square) – The North Carolina Senate’s version of a state budget for the next two years breezed through three committees Tuesday with few changes or opposition.

The proposed budget, Senate Bill 257, includes income tax cuts, and a doubling of taxes for sports betting companies who operate in North Carolina from 18% to 36%.

The Senate spending proposal, unlike Gov. Josh Stein’s proposed budget, fully funds the state’s retirement plan. It also increases funding for the state health care plan by $318 million over the next two years.

It would raise teacher pay and funding for colleges and universities.

“This budget continues the success North Carolina has seen over the last decade and half,” Sen. Ralph Hise, R-Mitchell, one of the bill’s sponsors, told members of the Appropriations/Base Budget Committee.

The first year of the two-year proposed budget is $32.6 billion, the second year $33.3 billion, Hise said. It’s an increase of $1.3 billion, or 4% in the first year, and $733 million in the second year.

He described it as “modest growth” that still allows the state to replenish its “rainy day” reserve fund, which at the end of two years will be back at $4.75 billion. It will bring state funding for a new children’s hospital in Charlotte to $855 million.

It adds another $700 million for Hurricane Helene recovery, adding to the $1.4 billion already appropriated.

“It is also our understanding that Gov. Stein is working on another request for recovery needs,” Hise said. “But as yet, we are not at that place.”

Some of the state funds spent on hurricane relief will likely be reimbursed by the federal government, Hise added.

“We are hopeful the federal government will provide increased and expedited reimbursements,” Hise said. “But we must prepare to fend for ourselves.”

Under the proposed budget, most state employees would receive 1.25% raise the first year and a $3,000 bonus over the entire two-year period covered by the budget, said Sen. Michael Lee, R-New Hanover.

Correctional officers would receive a 5.25% raise with other state law enforcement officers also getting extra pay raises. Local law enforcement officers would receive $3,000 bonuses over the two-year period. Nurses employed by the state would also received higher 3.25% raises over the two years.

Teachers would receive a 3.3% raise over the two years plus a $3,000 bonus. With those raises, the average teacher pay in North Carolina will be $62,407, Lee said.

The proposed budget passed the Appropriations/Base Budget Committee, Finance Committee and Pensions, Finance and Aging Committee with only minor changes on Tuesday.

The post Three committees favorable on Senate’s two-year budget | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - South Carolina News Feed

South Carolina No. 29 in Rich States, Poor States | South Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-15 14:56:00

(The Center Square) – South Carolina is ranked No. 29 in the country in economic outlook in the 18th annual Rich States, Poor States ranking.

Fifteen state policy variables are measured in the ALEC-Laffer State Economic Competitiveness Index, released Tuesday by the American Legislative Exchange Council. Better scores go to states spending and taxing less to attain higher growth rates.






A year ago, South Carolina was 24th. The drop of five spots was matched by four other states and eclipsed only by the 10-spot drops of Mississippi and Virginia.

South Carolina is No. 8 in economic performance rank, a measure that measures 2013-23 for state gross domestic product (11th), absolute domestic migration (5th), and nonfarm payroll employment (8th).

In the 15 variables, South Carolina is top five nationally in just three: estate/inheritance tax levied (none, tied 1st); minimum wage ($7.25 an hour, tied 1st); and right to work (yes, tied 1st). The state was 20th or worse in nine measurements.

The worst categories were each 44th: personal income tax progressivity ($21.43) and state tort system costs (2.54%)..

Among nearby states in the South, Tennessee was No. 2, North Carolina No. 4, Georgia No. 13, Florida No. 15, and Virginia No. 32.

The post South Carolina No. 29 in Rich States, Poor States | South Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Arkansas News Feed

Arkansas files USDA waiver to limit SNAP junk food | Arkansas

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Tom Joyce | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-15 14:40:00

(The Center Square) – Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders said she wants her state to eat healthier.

The Republican submitted a waiver to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) on Tuesday seeking federal approval for her plan to ban soft drinks and candy from Arkansas’ Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), often called food stamps.

“America’s facing a chronic disease epidemic,” Sanders said during a news conference Tuesday announcing her plans. “Obesity, diabetes, heart disease and other chronic illnesses are personal struggles for millions of Americans and driving significantly higher costs in our healthcare system. Sadly, Arkansas statistics are even worse than the nation as a whole.”

Critics of the move, such as American Beverage, derided the governor’s decision, arguing that the waiver won’t improve health outcomes and noting that the beverage industry supports 1,385 jobs statewide and contributes $391.9 million annually to the Arkansas economy.

“Make no mistake, this waiver won’t make an ounce of difference on health,” the trade organization said in a news release. “Obesity has skyrocketed in the last two decades while beverage calories per serving have dropped by 42% – thanks to our industry’s efforts to empower Americans with more choice and information. In fact, 60% of beverages Americans buy today have zero sugar due to our innovation.”

American Beverage noted the change would still let people buy various desserts, snack cakes, and other unhealthy items while only excluding two types of products.

“If Governor Sanders is serious about making Arkansas healthy again, this would be a comprehensive effort – not one narrowly focused on excluding one population from buying just two sets of products in the grocery store,” it added.

Sanders noted that one-third of Arkansas residents are either diabetic or pre-diabetic, a number she wants the state to reduce.

“When the numbers are that high, it’s important for us to examine a system that actively encourages and subsidizes unhealthy, highly processed, addictive products,” she said.

While speaking about chronic illness, Arkansas Department of Human Services Secretary Kristi Putnam said it’s logically inconsistent for a state to pay to make people unhealthy and then pay to try to manage their poor health.

“This makes no sense,” Putnam said. “Everything we do at DHS should contribute to improving health.”

“Why do we contribute to poor health in one program and then try to fix it in another program?” she added.

American Beverage countered, saying Sanders is sending a conflicting message.

“If the Governor is sincere about what taxpayers can buy with SNAP dollars, this sends a ridiculously conflicted message: it’s okay to buy a wide array of desserts, snack cakes and treats, just not soda and candy,” it said. “How does that make sense? Now if Arkansas really wanted to save its taxpayers money, it could eliminate the $44.7 million in SNAP fraud and overpayments in the state.

The waiver also requests that the USDA let Arkansas make rotisserie chicken a SNAP-eligible item; heated foods are generally ineligible for SNAP purchases.

USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins, who attended the news conference, said the request from Arkansas fits President Donald Trump’s public health agenda.

“President Trump has given his administration, our administration, a mandate to make America healthy again,” she said. “This is one of the things he campaigned on and this is what the American people voted for.”

American Beverage noted that Trump also campaigned on U.S. jobs and stands with American workers.

“America’s beverage companies will always stand with our consumers and their right to make the best decisions for their families. We are working every day to deliver more choices and information and do our part in making America healthier,” it said. “And we’re providing the good-paying, family-supporting jobs the president wants – the type of jobs that don’t require you to be on SNAP in the first place. Just as with our consumers, our workers and products don’t deserve to be denigrated either.”

SNAP is a $119 billion program that provides food for lower-income Americans. Yet, 23% ($27 billion) of that spending goes towards unhealthy foods like soda, candy, desserts and unhealthy snacks, according to a news release from the governor’s office.

Sanders said during the news conference that she’s not banning people from buying junk food.

“The government isn’t dictating what you can and can’t buy with your hard-earned money,” she said. “It’s simply saying that taxpayers are no longer going to cover the cost of junk food like candy and soft drinks.”

The post Arkansas files USDA waiver to limit SNAP junk food | Arkansas appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Continue Reading

Trending