SUMMARY: Birmingham celebrated a significant economic boost of $12.3 million from the NCAA Women’s Basketball Regional Tournament at Legacy Arena, where 45,000 tickets were sold. The event positively impacted local hotels and restaurants, enhancing Birmingham’s reputation as a desirable sports destination. David Gilbert from the Greater Birmingham Convention and Visitors Bureau highlighted the success of the tournament, which showcased the city’s potential for hosting future events such as the IndyCar race and the World Police and Fire Games. Coach Dawn Staley praised Birmingham for making her team feel welcome, underscoring the city’s ability to deliver exceptional experiences.

Birmingham celebrates $12 million boost from NCAA Women’s Basketball Regional

Subscribe to WVTM on YouTube now for more: https://bit.ly/2jvAaUD

Get more Birmingham news: http://www.wvtm13.com
Like us: https://www.facebook.com/WVTM13/
Follow us: https://twitter.com/WVTM13
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/wvtm13/

Source

by Ariana Figueroa, Alabama Reflector
April 7, 2025

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court Monday said the Trump administration could continue for now to use the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to carry out rapid deportations of Venezuelans suspected of being gang members — but they must be given a chance to challenge their deportations in court.

The 5-4 decision, which lifted a temporary restraining order by a District of Columbia federal judge, will allow the Trump administration to deport Venezuelans 14 and older who are suspected of Tren de Aragua gang ties, in a victory for the administration of President Donald Trump.

But those immigrants who are subject to the wartime law must have “reasonable notice” in order to challenge their deportation in court “before such removal occurs,” according to the order. The question is which court.

The order argues that the venue of the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia is wrong, and that the challenge, which was originally brought by five men in Texas, should be made in the Lone Star State. The challenge is no longer brought by five men and is now a class action.

“The detainees seek equitable relief against the implementation of the Proclamation and against their removal under the (Alien Enemies Act),” according to the Supreme Court. “They challenge the Government’s interpretation of the Act and assert that they do not fall within the category of removable alien enemies. But we do not reach those arguments.”

The president praised the decision, which did not address the merits of the actual law, on social media.

“The Supreme Court has upheld the Rule of Law in our Nation by allowing a President, whoever that may be, to be able to secure our Borders, and protect our families and our Country, itself,” Trump wrote. “A GREAT DAY FOR JUSTICE IN AMERICA!”

Dissenting justices

The three liberal justices dissented: Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. The fourth dissent, in part, came from Amy Coney Barrett, who is considered a member of the court’s six-justice conservative majority.

“The Court’s legal conclusion is suspect,” Sotomayor wrote in her dissent.

She added that the majority opinion did not note the harm that could come to the Venezuelans who could face deportation under the Alien Enemies Act. Already, 238 men have been subject to the proclamation and are currently in a brutal mega-prison in El Salvador, the Terrorist Confinement Center  or CECOT.

“It does so without mention of the grave harm Plaintiffs will face if they are erroneously removed to El Salvador or regard for the Government’s attempts to subvert the judicial process throughout this litigation,” she said. “Because the Court should not reward the Government’s efforts to erode the rule of law with discretionary equitable relief, I respectfully dissent.”

There is a preliminary injunction hearing against the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act Tuesday at 3 p.m. Eastern before U.S. District Court Judge James E. Boasberg. That hearing deals with the administration’s use of the law.

This was the second decision from the high court Monday that sided with the Trump administration.

Earlier, Chief Justice John Roberts decided to temporarily pause a lower court’s order to require the Trump administration to return to the United States a Maryland man wrongly deported to a prison in El Salvador.

Appeal to the high court

The Trump administration March 28 appealed to the Supreme Court after an appeals court declined to do away with the temporary restraining order placed by Boasberg.

Boasberg had extended his temporary restraining order until April 12 to prevent any more deportations of Venezuelan nationals, invoked by Trump with a presidential proclamation on March 14.

The American Civil Liberties Union brought the suit against the Trump administration’s use of the wartime law. The legal organization asked the Supreme Court to keep the temporary restraining order in place because “it is becoming increasingly clear that many (perhaps most) of the men” who were on the March 15 deportation flights to the prison in El Salvador “were not actually members of” the Tren de Aragua and were “erroneously listed” due to their tattoos.

The same day that Boasberg issued his restraining order, on March 15, three deportation flights landed in El Salvador, where 261 men were taken to the mega-prison.

Boasberg has vowed to determine if the Trump administration violated his restraining order by asking for flight details but the Department of Justice has invoked the so-called “state secrets privilege” to block any information.

Last updated 7:31 p.m., Apr. 7, 2025

Alabama Reflector is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Alabama Reflector maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Brian Lyman for questions: info@alabamareflector.com.

The post Supreme Court permits Trump to use wartime law for deportations, for now and with limits appeared first on alabamareflector.com

SUMMARY: On Saturday, hundreds gathered in Huntsville’s Big Spring Park as part of over 1,000 nationwide protests opposing the Trump administration. Demonstrators voiced concerns about perceived threats to federal jobs, benefits, and agencies like the Army, NASA, and Social Security. Many called out what they viewed as executive overreach and authoritarian policies, aiming to show solidarity and demand accountability. Some longtime Republicans expressed disappointment with their party’s current direction. Protest organizers emphasized the need to raise their voices against power-driven governance. In response, the White House reiterated President Trump’s commitment to protecting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid for eligible Americans.

The protest was among over a thousand that took place nationwide Saturday.

News 19 is North Alabama’s News Leader! We are the CBS affiliate in North Alabama and the Tennessee Valley since November 28, 1963.

https://whnt.com/
https://www.facebook.com/whntnews19
https://www.instagram.com/whntnews19/
https://twitter.com/whnt

Source