(The Center Square) – Virginia will begin replacing the aging Norris Bridge eight years ahead of schedule under a new infrastructure plan backed by Gov. Glenn Youngkin.

The project, including construction and preliminary engineering work, is expected to cost more than $400 million. It will rebuild the 1.9-mile span connecting Lancaster and Middlesex counties, a key route for more than 7,500 drivers daily.

Built in 1957, the current bridge lacks shoulders and has narrow lanes, prompting long-standing safety concerns. A sudden closure could force an 85-mile detour.

Its aging design has made it one of the most closely watched bridges in the region. A previous report stated that the existing bridge is “continuously subject to a patchwork of emergency repairs and routine maintenance and does not meet current structural standards.” The report also notes that because the structure is in a saltwater environment, it deteriorates more rapidly than land-based bridges.

Lawmakers approved a new funding mechanism this year that lets Virginia borrow up to $1 billion for urgent bridge replacements, including Norris, and tunnels across the commonwealth. The law allows the state to issue up to $200 million in bonds each year, targeting “special structures” that are costly and critical to regional travel.  

Youngkin said the bridge will “help keep travelers safe for the next century and drive growth for local communities.”

“It is time to build a modern bridge that will serve the communities of the Northern Neck and Middle Peninsula for the next 100 years,” said Youngkin in a statement. “Today we are accelerating construction of a new Norris Bridge to meet the daily travel needs of residents and businesses, and to welcome visitors to these scenic waterfront regions. Through this action, people will be driving over the new bridge almost a decade sooner than expected.”  

The new bridge will include wider lanes, shoulders, and higher guardrails, as well as upgrades that bring it in line with modern safety standards.

Preliminary work, including soil samplings, environmental review, and location studies is underway to determine the best site and foundation for the new bridge. Right-of-way acquisition will begin only after those reviews are complete.

The existing bridge is rated in fair condition and has undergone multiple repairs in recent years, including a $7.1 million steel rehabilitation project to maintain structural integrity.

Sen. Ryan McDougle, who introduced the bill, said the project reflects a broader push to improve bridges and tunnels across Virginia, adding: “Even if you live miles from one of these tunnels or bridges, the benefits will be experienced by us all.” 

Senate Bill 1082 passed with broad bipartisan support and creates a long-term strategy for replacing major structures before they become safety liabilities.

Construction is set to begin in 2028, and the current bridge will be demolished only after the new bridge is open. 

(The Center Square) – A nonprofit public-interest litigation firm filed a lawsuit Monday alleging President Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs require congressional approval. 

The Liberty Justice Center, based in Texas, challenged the administration’s reciprocal tariffs, which Trump announced on April 2 and suspended on April 9, hours after they went into effect.

The Liberty Justice Center filing argues that the administration has no authority to issue across-the-board worldwide tariffs without congressional approval. The nonprofits lawsuit alleges Trump has broadly overstepped his authority by claiming “the authority to unilaterally levy tariffs on goods imported from any and every country in the world, at any rate, calculated via any methodology – or mere caprice – immediately, with no notice, or public comment, or phase-in, or delay in implementation, despite massive economic impacts that are likely to do severe damage to the global economy.”

The suit alleges that the statute Trump has used to justify the tariffs, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, doesn’t give Trump the authority he thinks it does. 

“His claimed emergency is a figment of his own imagination: trade deficits, which have persisted for decades without causing economic harm, are not an emergency,” according to the lawsuit. “Nor do these trade deficits constitute an ‘unusual and extraordinary threat.'”

The suit asks the U.S. Court of International Trade to “declare the President’s unprecedented power grab illegal, enjoin the operation of the executive actions that purport to impose these tariffs under the IEEPA, and reaffirm this country’s core founding principle: there shall be no taxation without representation.”

Liberty Justice Center filed the case on behalf of New York-based wine and spirit importers VOS Selections; Pennsylvania-based freshwater fishing supplier FishUSA; Utah-based plumbing and irrigation suppliers Genova Pipe; Virginia-based toy designer MicroKits LLC; and Vermont-based women’s bicycling company Terry Precision Cycling.

All five companies import products from other countries affected by the tariffs, including the 10% baseline tariffs.

The suit argues Trump’s tariffs were over broad and disregarded existing trade agreements.

“These tariffs even applied to places with no civilian population or international trade activity, such as the British Indian Ocean Territory, whose only human inhabitants belong to a joint American and British military base on the island of Diego Garcia, and the Heard and McDonald Islands, which are inhabited only by penguins and seals,” Liberty Justice Center attorneys noted in the court filing. 

Liberty Justice Center said that Trump’s so-called “reciprocal” tariffs were crude calculations: “The chosen formula is not an accepted methodology for calculating trade barriers and has no basis in economic theory.”

The Liberty Justice Center action also takes issues with the idea that trade deficits are bad. Trump has repeatedly said that U.S. trade deficits are the result of trading partners ripping off the U.S. for decades. 

“Nor are trade deficits an emergency or even necessarily a problem; they simply mean that some other country sells lots of things Americans want to buy, or that its people are unwilling or unable (often because of poverty) to purchase many American goods,” according to the lawsuit.

Trump has made audacious promises about his tariffs on the campaign trail and since inauguration. He has said tariffs will make the U.S. “rich as hell,” bring back manufacturing jobs lost to lower-wage countries in decades past and shift the tax burden away from U.S. families.

A tariff is a tax on imported goods. The importer pays the tax and can either absorb the loss or pass the tax on to consumers in the form of higher prices.

In his “Liberation Day” speech, Trump said foreign nations for decades have stolen American jobs, factories and industries. He said the tariffs would bring in new jobs, factories and industries and return the U.S. to a manufacturing superpower.

“Our country and its taxpayers have been ripped off for more than 50 years,” Trump said. “But it is not going to happen anymore.”

Some nations, including China, have responded with retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods. Others have signaled they are eager to make a deal with the Trump administration. Trump has not yet announced any trade deals. Trump paused the higher tariffs for 90 days, giving his administration limited time to make deals with 75 nations the White House reported reached out seeking trade negotiations.