Kaiser Health News
New Eligibility Rules Are a Financial Salve for Nearly 2 Million on Medi-Cal
Bernard J. Wolfson
Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:00:00 +0000
Millions of Medi-Cal beneficiaries can now save for a rainy day, keep an inheritance, or hold on to a modest nest egg, without losing coverage, thanks to an eligibility change phased in over the past year and a half. It also has opened the door for thousands who previously did not qualify for Medi-Cal, the health insurance program for low-income residents that covers over one-third of California’s population.
Until Jan. 1, 3 million Medi-Cal beneficiaries, mainly those who are aged, blind, disabled, in long-term care, or in the federal Supplemental Security Income program, faced limits on the value of financial accounts and personal property they could hold to qualify for coverage. Now, nearly 2 million of them will no longer face these restrictions, putting them on par with the roughly 12 million other Medi-Cal beneficiaries who don’t have asset limits.
They still must be below Medi-Cal’s income threshold, which for most enrollees is currently $1,677 a month for a single adult and $3,450 for a family of four. However, the change will eliminate a lot of paperwork for applicants and the county workers who verify their eligibility.
For a long time, this group of Medi-Cal beneficiaries could have no more than $2,000 in the bank — $3,000 for a married couple — though the home they lived in, as well as one car and certain types of other personal property, were exempt.
“If you had $5,000 in assets, you would have to spend $3,000 on something to prove that you were beneath the limit to qualify,” says Tiffany Huyenh-Cho, a senior attorney at the advocacy group Justice in Aging. “We had people who prepaid rent, spent money on car repairs, bought a new couch or appliances — things to reduce their assets in order to get to the $2,000 limit.”
Now, Huyenh-Cho adds, “you don’t have to remain in deep poverty. You can save for an emergency; you can save for retirement or for a security deposit if you want to move.”
And those who have hoped to leave a little something for their children when they die can now do so, even if they need expensive long-term care.
The first phase of the rule change was implemented in July 2022, when the threshold was raised dramatically to $130,000 for an individual and $195,000 for a two-person household, making it a nonfactor for the vast majority of those concerned. After all, most people with incomes low enough to qualify for Medi-Cal would not have that much saved. For this reason, the total elimination of the so-called asset test ushered in this year is expected to help fewer people financially than the first change did.
Still, there are some people with more than $130,000 in the bank whose savings would have been wiped out in shockingly short order had they needed long-term care in a nursing facility or at home. Now, they can qualify to have Medi-Cal pick up that cost.
Joanne Shinozaki, a resident of Granada Hills, a Los Angeles neighborhood, hired private full-time caregiving last year for her mother, Fujiko, who has dementia. But it cost nearly $11,000 a month, which Shinozaki quickly realized would burn fast through the roughly $200,000 in savings her father had left when he died early last year. Reluctantly, she put her mom in a memory care home, which was less expensive. But after a 10% increase in January, it is now costing $9,000 a month, although that includes food and utilities.
Because of the money Shinozaki’s dad left, her mom did not qualify for Medi-Cal under the old rules. But now, that money no longer counts against her. Shinozaki, a veterinarian who quit her job to coordinate her mother’s care, needs to return to work soon. She has applied for Medi-Cal for her mom and is waiting for it to be approved.
“It would mean being able to bring her back to the house where she’s lived since 1988, if she’s well enough to come home,” Shinozaki says. To do that, she will need to get her mom access to caregivers via Medi-Cal’s In-Home Supportive Services program.
Indeed, another benefit of the change in eligibility rules is that it supports the caregiver economy, says Kim Selfon, a Medi-Cal and IHSS policy specialist at Bet Tzedek Legal Services, which provides free legal assistance to people in LA County.
Advocates who work with Medi-Cal enrollees and applicants say they often have to explain the difference between assets and income. “I think a lot of people are confused,” says Stephanie Fajuri, program director at the Center for Health Care Rights, an LA-based nonprofit that helps people navigate Medi-Cal and Medicare. “They say, ‘What do you mean? I could be making $1 million a year?’ And we say, ‘No, that’s income.’”
So, let’s be clear: Under the new rules, yes, you can have a second house. But if you are renting it out, that’s income — and given today’s rental prices, it will likely disqualify you from full Medi-Cal benefits. You can also keep an investment account regardless of the balance, but distributions from it as well as any interest, dividends, and capital gains it generates are also income.
Again, most beneficiaries are unlikely to have a large pool of assets and still have income low enough to qualify for Medi-Cal. But if you suddenly inherit a modest sum, or even a large one, now you can keep it, though it may briefly affect your coverage.
Unfortunately, the 1.1 million Medi-Cal beneficiaries receiving Supplemental Security Income are still subject to an asset test, because different rules apply to them.
Advocates and legal aid attorneys say there hasn’t been enough public education about the elimination of the asset limits and that many people still believe their bank accounts or personal property rule them out.
People may also fear the state will take their house and other assets after they die to recoup what it spent on their care. That worry could intensify now that people can keep all their assets and still be on Medi-Cal. But a 2017 change in the law restricted the state’s ability to put a claim on your house or other assets after you die and made it relatively easy to insulate them entirely.
The state can claim only up to the amount Medi-Cal spent on certain medical services, including long-term and intermediate care and related costs. Even in those cases, it cannot touch your home or any other asset if you have protected it by putting it in a living trust or through some other legal move that keeps it out of probate court. And the state can’t put a claim on it if there is a co-owner who outlives the Medi-Cal beneficiary.
“Now that people can hold unlimited assets, they need to be more cognizant of protecting them should they need long-term care,” says Dina Dimirjian, a staff attorney at Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County.
The Department of Health Care Services, which oversees Medi-Cal, has published on its website (dhcs.ca.gov) an FAQ on the elimination of the asset test. Another good source of information, and legal assistance, is the Health Consumer Alliance (healthconsumer.org or 888-804-3536).
The end of the asset test will also cure a big bureaucratic headache for beneficiaries and applicants and free up countless hours for Medi-Cal eligibility workers in county offices.
“People had to navigate this and figure out what counts and what doesn’t count, and they had to prove it, and the county had to verify it,” says David Kane, a senior attorney at the Western Center on Law & Poverty. “It’s a good thing we can say goodbye to it.”
This article was produced by KFF Health News, which publishes California Healthline, an editorially independent service of the California Health Care Foundation.Â
KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.
USE OUR CONTENT
This story can be republished for free (details).
——————————
By: Bernard J. Wolfson
Title: New Eligibility Rules Are a Financial Salve for Nearly 2 Million on Medi-Cal
Sourced From: kffhealthnews.org/news/article/2-million-medi-cal-california-medicaid-asset-test-savings/
Published Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:00:00 +0000
Kaiser Health News
Texas Measles Outbreak Nears 100 Cases, Raising Concerns About Undetected Spread
SUMMARY: A measles outbreak in West Texas has led to private school closures, overwhelming local health departments. Since the outbreak began three weeks ago, 90 cases have been confirmed, mostly in children under 18, with 16 hospitalizations. Health officials fear the outbreak will worsen, and some parents may be avoiding testing their children. The outbreak has been exacerbated by low vaccination rates, particularly in communities like Gaines, which has one of the lowest vaccination rates in Texas. Local officials are working to contain the virus through pop-up clinics, mobile testing, and educating schools, but the situation remains challenging.
The post Texas Measles Outbreak Nears 100 Cases, Raising Concerns About Undetected Spread appeared first on kffhealthnews.org
Kaiser Health News
GOP Takes Aim at Medicaid, Putting Enrollees and Providers at Risk
SUMMARY: Republicans are again targeting Medicaid, proposing significant funding cuts to finance President Trump’s agenda on tax cuts and border security. Approximately 79 million people rely on Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), vital for numerous hospitals and states. Amid Democratic resistance, potential cuts could include reducing federal matching funds and imposing work requirements, which critics argue adds unnecessary barriers. Historically controversial, these efforts reflect deep partisan divides over Medicaid’s role as a safety net versus a welfare program. Many Americans favor Medicaid, making proposed cuts politically sensitive. The outcome remains uncertain as GOP leaders face internal challenges.
The post GOP Takes Aim at Medicaid, Putting Enrollees and Providers at Risk appeared first on kffhealthnews.org
Kaiser Health News
An Ice Rink To Fight Opioid Crisis: Drug-Free Fun vs. Misuse of Settlement Cash
SUMMARY: Carter County, Kentucky, has controversially spent $15,000 of its opioid settlement funds on an ice rink, raising concerns about its relevance to the ongoing opioid crisis. Advocates argue that resources could be better allocated to overdose prevention, such as Narcan kits or local substance abuse programs. Brittany Herrington, a local in recovery, criticized the decision as neglecting community needs. While officials claim the rink fosters drug-free youth activities, critics note it lacks direct ties to combating addiction. Local leaders are calling for stricter oversight on how settlement funds are used, emphasizing the need for targeted support in addressing substance use disorders.
The post An Ice Rink To Fight Opioid Crisis: Drug-Free Fun vs. Misuse of Settlement Cash appeared first on kffhealthnews.org
-
News from the South - Louisiana News Feed3 days ago
Jeff Landry’s budget includes cuts to Louisiana’s domestic violence shelter funding
-
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed3 days ago
Bills from NC lawmakers expand gun rights, limit cellphone use
-
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed7 days ago
Modest drops in some North Carolina prices under Trump | North Carolina
-
News from the South - Arkansas News Feed7 days ago
Timing out the incoming winter weather
-
News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed5 days ago
Remains of Aubrey Dameron found, family gathers in her honor
-
News from the South - Texas News Feed3 days ago
ICE charges Texas bakery owners with harboring immigrants
-
News from the South - Florida News Feed7 days ago
Expert discusses how deportations could cause labor shortages for several industries
-
News from the South - South Carolina News Feed7 days ago
SC Flu cases on the rise: Prisma Health Doctors speak out on how to spot symptoms, get treatment