Connect with us

Mississippi Today

Lawsuit challenges Mississippi’s urban renewal law being used on Ocean Springs homes

Published

on

A group of Ocean Springs residents, a business owner and a church all filed a lawsuit in federal court against the city on Thursday over an urban renewal plan that labeled certain properties as “slums” or “blighted.”

In April, the city gave that designation to over 100 properties around Ocean Springs. By doing so, the city paved the way to invoke a state law that allows the acquisition of such properties — with or without the owners’ permission — in order to remove “economic and social liability.” While many of the properties listed in the urban renewal plan are vacant lots, they also include occupied homes, businesses and the parking lot of a church in a historic Black neighborhood.

But residents say they didn’t find out about the plan until the city shared it on social media before a board meeting in August. The state law, according to Thursday’s lawsuit, allows just 10 days for residents to contest a “blighted” designation, meaning that Ocean Springs property owners missed their chance to do so because they only found out about the plan months later.

The Institute for Justice, a nonprofit law firm from Virginia that specializes in eminent domain cases, is representing the plaintiffs. The lawsuit is not just going after the city of Ocean Springs, but Mississippi’s laws around urban renewal in general.

Ocean Springs residents listen as other residents express their concerns with the city’s proposed Urban Renewal Plan during a public hearing at the Ocean Springs Civic Center on Monday, Oct. 2, 2023. Credit: Eric Shelton/Mississippi Today

“Mississippi law says you have to challenge the ‘blight’ designation in 10 days,” said IJ attorney Dana Berliner. “And people were contacting us (about the urban renewal plan) long after that. That is a violation of due process.”

Specifically, the complaint asks for judgments declaring the city violated the property owners’ rights to due process, that the city’s urban renewal plan is invalid, and that the state’s laws around urban renewal are unconstitutional.

After pushback following the August city board meeting, Mayor Kenny Holloway has repeatedly stated that the city won’t forcibly acquire anyone’s property. Holloway, who according to his city bio owns a real estate and development company, said last week at a public comment session that the city could’ve done a better job of communicating the intentions of the urban renewal plan. He added that the idea was to use federal grants to help make improvements around Ocean Springs.

Ocean Springs Mayor Kenny Holloway, left, responds to a speaker after concerns were expressed about the city’s proposed Urban Renewal Plan during a public hearing at the Ocean Springs Civic Center on Monday, Oct. 2, 2023. Credit: Eric Shelton/Mississippi Today

It’s unclear what the city’s next steps are now that it’s facing a federal lawsuit. Holloway told the Sun Herald after last week’s meeting: “We’re not going to stop the plan. We’re going to try to find some common ground and move forward.”

But even if the city doesn’t use the plan to acquire residents’ home, or even if the city scraps the plan altogether, harm has already been done to those property owners, Berliner explained.

“Even if the current administration does nothing like that, (the ‘blight’ label) is going to be there 20 years later,” she said.

According to the state law, she said, the owners have no way of removing the label after the 10-day period, which means a future administration could still acquire the “blighted” properties under a new urban renewal plan.

Ocean Springs residents whose properties have belonged to their families for generations argue that their homes and land don’t meet the criteria for “blighted” areas.

“We’re proud of our neighborhood, and while we may not have a lot of money to put in our homes, we keep them well,” homeowner Cynthia Fisher said. “What the city did, labeling our neighborhood as a slum without telling us, was wrong.”

Fisher is a plaintiff in the case along with homeowners Esther Payton and Edward Williams. Robert Zellner, who owns an auto repair store in the designated “blighted” area, and the Macedonia Missionary Baptist Church, which owns the aforementioned parking lot, are also plaintiffs. A link to the full complaint can be found here.

Mississippi Today is working on ongoing coverage of this story.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Did you miss our previous article…
https://www.biloxinewsevents.com/?p=295794

Mississippi Today

‘The pressure … has gotten worse:’ Facing new charge, Tim Herrington will remain in jail until trial, judge rules

Published

on

mississippitoday.org – Molly Minta – 2025-02-27 12:17:00

‘The pressure … has gotten worse:’ Facing new charge, Tim Herrington will remain in jail until trial, judge rules

OXFORD — A judge denied bond Thursday for the University of Mississippi graduate who is accused of killing Jimmie “Jay” Lee, a well-known member of the LGBTQ+ community in this north Mississippi college, and hiding his body. 

Lafayette County Circuit Court Judge Kelly Luther made the decision during Sheldon Timothy Herrington Jr.’s bond hearing, which was held on the heels of the discovery of Lee’s body. Despite the finding, the prosecution also announced that it would not seek the death penalty, just as it had declined to during last year’s trial that resulted in an 11-1 hung jury. 

“The pressure on Mr. Herrington has gotten worse,” Luther said. “The justification for not showing up is about as high as it can get. The only thing higher is if the state had said ‘we’re gonna seek the death penalty.’”

Though Herrington, a son of a prominent church family in Grenada, had previously been out on bond, he will now remain in jail pending trial. The prosecution recently secured a new indictment against Herrington for capital murder and hiding Lee’s remains, which were found in a well-known dumping ground in Carroll County, 19 minutes from Herrington’s family home, wrapped in moving blankets and duct tape and hidden among mattresses and tires. 

Lee was found with a silk bonnet, which evidence shows Lee had worn when he returned to Herrington’s home the morning he went missing on July 8, 2022. 

Herrington’s new counsel, Aafram Sellers, a criminal attorney from the Jackson area, said he was too new to the case to comment on the possibility of a plea deal. But he made several pointed arguments against the state’s move to revoke Herrington’s bond, calling it an attempt “to be punitive in nature when the presumption still remains innocent until proven guilty.” 

Before making his decision, Luther asked the prosecution, who had previously agreed to give Herrington a bond in 2022, “what’s changed since then?” 

Lafayette County District Attorney Ben Creekmore responded that the state now had more evidence, when previously, the case “was mostly circumstantial evidence.” 

“Now they want to hold us to that same agreement when the situation has changed,” Creekmore said. “We tried the case. … Everyone knows it was an 11-1 finding of guilt on capital murder.” 

“It’s not a no-body homicide this time,” he added. 

This prompted Sellers to accuse the prosecution of attempting to taint a future jury, because the court had not established the jury’s split. 

“Just because it’s on the internet doesn’t mean it’s a fact,” Sellers said.  

Prior to discussing Herrington’s bond, Luther heard arguments on Sellers’ motion to dismiss Herrington’s new charge of evidence tampering for hiding Lee’s body. Sellers argued the charge violated the statute of limitations because law enforcement knew, by dint of not finding Lee’s body at the alleged crime scene, that evidence tampering had occurred, so Herrington should have been charged with that crime back in 2022. 

“If there is a gun here that is a murder weapon and I walk out of here and leave and they never find it, but they know a murder happened in this courtroom, they know I moved evidence on today’s date,” Sellers said. “It’s not hard to contemplate that.” 

This led Luther, who said he was not prepared to rule, to ask both parties to provide him with cases establishing a legal precedent in Mississippi.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Continue Reading

Mississippi Today

Mississippi private prison OK’d to hold more ICE detainees

Published

on

mississippitoday.org – Mina Corpuz – 2025-02-27 11:41:00

Federal immigration officials will soon be able to house an additional 250 people at a privately run prison in the Delta. 

Tennessee-based CoreCivic announced Thursday that it has entered contract modifications for the Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility in Tutwiler, which has held U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainees for years.

“We are entering a period where our government partners, particularly our federal government partners, are expected to have increased demand,” Damon T. Hininger, CoreCivic’s chief executive officer, said in a statement. “We anticipate additional contracting activity that will help satisfy their growing needs.”

The 2,672-bed facility already houses Mississippi inmates and some pretrial detainees, out-of-state inmates including those from Vermont and South Carolina and U.S. Marshals Service detainees, which includes immigration detainees.

On Thursday, CoreCivic also announced contract modifications to add a nearly 800-detainee capacity at three other facilities it operates: Northeast Ohio Correctional Center, Nevada Southern Detention Center and Cimarron Correctional Facility in Oklahoma. 

The company also operates the Adams County Correctional Center in Natchez, which is holding the largest number of ICE detainees, averaging 2,154 a day, according to the data collected by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse and reviewed by Axios.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Continue Reading

Mississippi Today

Ocean Springs homeowners file appeal challenging state’s blight laws

Published

on

mississippitoday.org – Alex Rozier – 2025-02-27 10:10:00

Ocean Springs homeowners on Wednesday appealed a federal court’s decision to dismiss their lawsuit against the city. The dispute stems from the city’s 2023 proposed urban renewal plan that would have permanently labeled some properties as “slum” or “blighted.”

While later that year the city voted against the plan after receiving public pushback, as the Sun Herald reported, the plaintiffs maintain that the state code behind the city’s plan violates their constitutional right to due process. They also argue that there’s nothing stopping the city of Ocean Springs, whose mayor, Kenny Holloway, supported the plan, from reintroducing the idea down the road.

Property owner Marie Cochran poses for a portrait after expressing her concerns with Ocean Springs’ proposed Urban Renewal Plan on Tuesday, Oct. 3, 2023. Credit: Eric Shelton/Mississippi Today

In January, U.S. District Judge Taylor McNeel granted the city’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit, saying the appropriate way to contest the urban renewal plan was by appealing to their locally elected officials.

“This is somewhat evident by how the Plaintiffs’ complaints to their elected leaders have resulted in their properties being removed from the urban renewal area,” McNeel wrote in his opinion. “In a way, the Plaintiffs have already won.”

Under Mississippi law, cities are not required to notify owners of properties that they label “blighted,” a distinction that doesn’t go away. On top of that, those property owners only have 10 days to challenge the designation, a limitation that doesn’t exist in most states, an attorney for the plaintiffs told Mississippi Today in 2023. In 2023, property owners whose land was labeled “blighted” in the Ocean Springs urban renewal plan didn’t know about the designation until months later.

A sign that expresses opposition to Ocean Springs’ proposed Urban Renewal Plan is seen in the front yard of a home in Ocean Springs, Miss., Tuesday, Oct. 3, 2023. Credit: Eric Shelton/Mississippi Today

While Holloway, who also owns a real estate and development company, maintained that the city never wanted to forcibly take anyone’s property, a “blight” designation would have allowed the city to do just that through eminent domain.

The nonprofit Institute for Justice represents the five homeowners and church that filed the suit in Wednesday’s appeal to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

“Mississippi governments cannot brand neighborhoods as slums in secret,” Dana Berliner, an attorney at the institute, said in a written statement. “Obviously telling a person about something when it’s too late to do anything is not the meaningful opportunity to be heard that the U.S. Constitution’s Due Process Clause requires.”

The nonprofit said it plans to make oral arguments in the New Orleans court later this year.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Continue Reading

Trending