Connect with us

Mississippi Today

How Mississippi’s Supreme Court Runoff Election Could Impact Criminal Cases

Published

on

mississippitoday.org – Caleb Bedillion, The Marshall Project and Daja E. Henry, The Marshall Project – 2024-11-21 11:00:00

Mississippi voters have dealt defeat to one conservative state Supreme Court justice and forced a moderate justice into a Nov. 26 runoff, with the final outcome possibly making the court more open to considering the rights of criminal defendants.

The nine-member court is largely conservative but justices have recently split in high-profile decisions that sharply affected state politics, including a ruling that shut down citizen-led ballot initiatives in Mississippi and allowed some state control over local criminal cases in its majority-Black capital. The court has also rendered rulings that have made the state increasingly unfavorable to defendants appealing their cases. 

“The ability of death row inmates in particular, and inmates in general, to access the courts has been recently curtailed significantly,” Matthew Steffey, a professor at Mississippi College School of Law, told The Marshall Project – Jackson and Bolts following the Nov. 5 election.  

Justice Dawn H. Beam joined the majority in those decisions, acquiring a reputation of being hostile to appeals by criminal defendants, and she ran for reelection this fall as the Republican Party’s favored candidate. However, she lost in the state’s 2nd District on Nov. 5 to David P. Sullivan, a defense attorney who has worked as a public defender.

Judicial races in Mississippi are nonpartisan and Sullivan has given few explicit signals about his judicial outlook. He has supported at least some criminal justice reforms and would be the third justice with experience as a defense attorney on this court. Some reformers nationwide have pushed for more professional diversity on the bench.

Even if Sullivan turns out to be more centrist or independent than Beam on criminal law, any overall shift in power on the court depends on the outcome of a runoff election next week. 

Two-term Justice Jim Kitchens and challenger Jenifer B. Branning will face each other in the Nov. 26 runoff election after neither won more than 50% of the vote on Nov. 5. The runoff will take place across the 22 counties that make up the Supreme Court’s central district, including Hinds County, home to Jackson. Throughout the campaign, the state GOP targeted Kitchens with attacks, while Branning, a Republican state senator with a conservative voting record, is endorsed by the party.

Kitchens is one of two reliably moderate-to-liberal high court justices. Justices from among an additional group of four sometimes veer away from the majority, as well, but can be more unpredictable, and this group does not vote as a bloc. 

Quinn Yeargain, a Michigan State University law professor who closely watches state courts, recently analyzed the court’s voting patterns and found Beam was consistently more conservative than Kitchens in recent cases. Yeargain told The Marshall Project – Jackson and Bolts that conservative and liberal voters often have few signals about how to select a candidate in judicial races. “It’s very hard to label the justices,” they said.


Sullivan — whose father was a Mississippi Supreme Court justice from 1984 to 2000 — called himself a “conservative” throughout his campaign. But he has also touted the value of judicial independence and criticized Beam for campaigning on her endorsement by the state Republican Party. 

“I think that rubbed a lot of people the wrong way,” Sullivan told the Sun Herald newspaper, speaking of Beam’s use of the endorsement. “Judicial races are nonpartisan for a reason. A judge’s impartiality could be called into question.”

Sullivan has broad legal experience, but much of his career has focused on private criminal defense while also doing some public defense work. He told The Marshall Project – Jackson and Mississippi Today that he supported a new administrative rule handed down in 2023 by the state Supreme Court to require continuous legal representation for poor criminal defendants from the beginning of their cases. An investigation by The Marshall Project, ProPublica and the Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal last year found, however, that many courts were unready at the time to implement the new representation rules.

During the campaign, Sullivan told The Marshall Project – Jackson and Mississippi Today that more work is needed to improve public defense.

Kitchens has also advocated for public defense reforms during his two terms on the court. He told a committee of legislators last year that the “playing field is far from level” between prosecutors and poor defendants.

On other criminal justice issues, he has sometimes dissented from opinions upholding death sentences. His decisions have scrutinized prosecutorial conduct and inadequate legal representation. 

Branning, the Republican senator, has a voting record on criminal justice issues that suggests a harsher approach toward criminal defendants. She has supported higher mandatory minimum sentences and reclassifying misdemeanors as felonies, has opposed expansion of parole and was among only a few lawmakers who voted against legalizing medical marijuana. 

She also supported increasing the jurisdiction of a controversial, state-run police force inside the majority-Black city of Jackson as well as increasing state control over many felony cases in Jackson. The Supreme Court unanimously curtailed much state power over these felony cases, but a majority left some control intact, with Kitchens and another judge dissenting.

Branning did not respond to questions from The Marshall Project – Jackson and Mississippi Today during the Nov. 5 campaign about her possible judicial outlook.

Kitchens was a prosecutor and then in private practice before joining the bench. Branning is a practicing attorney who typically handles civil cases. 

The winner of the Nov. 26 runoff will join Sullivan on a court that in recent years has been restricting the ability of people who say the legal system has wronged them to seek relief, legal experts told The Marshall Project – Jackson and Bolts this month. 

Krissy Nobile, director of the state’s Office of Capital Post-Conviction Counsel, said it’s become “increasingly more difficult to correct a wrongful conviction.” Her office provides legal counsel for indigent people on death row. 

She said a number of recent cases showed the barriers the high court has erected for criminal defendants appealing their convictions, and demonstrated indifference to civil rights violations. Kitchens disagreed with the majority, in full or in part, in all but one of the appeals, which the court unanimously denied.

In a case earlier this year, the Court ruled to monetarily fine an incarcerated person for filing any future post-conviction relief petitions that lacked merit. Kitchens joined a dissenting opinion condemning the fine. In another, the court denied a man who argued that his lawyers were ineffective and that they did not challenge prosecutorial misconduct or false forensic evidence presented by a medical examiner with a checkered past. The court’s majority denied the motion, and in the process, overturned a precedent that allowed ineffective counsel as an adequate reason to give a case another look in some types of appeals. Kitchens dissented, along with two other justices. 

“For decades in Mississippi, the Court held that it would correct errors if there was a violation (of) a person’s fundamental rights,” Nobile said. But she added this has changed considerably. Now, if you land a terrible lawyer who rushes your case, “You are out of luck,” she said, “even if your core constitutional rights have been clearly violated.” 

For the court’s majority, Nobile added, “The legal technicalities now trump a person’s constitutional rights.” 

Branning, left, and Kitchens at the Neshoba County Fair in August 2024. Credit: Eric Shelton, Mississippi Today

The runoff is the nation’s final supreme court race of the year. Thirty-two states held elections for their high courts earlier this year, resulting in a muddled picture, with liberals and conservatives each gaining ground in different places, Bolts reports

Mississippi’s runoff outcome will heavily depend on turnout and the composition of the electorate. In the Supreme Court’s central district, voters split narrowly between Democrat Kamala Harris and Republican Donald Trump in the presidential election on Nov. 5, but the runoff is just two days before Thanksgiving and will likely see a large dropoff in turnout. Branning received 42% of the vote in the first round, and Kitchens received 36%, with three other candidates making up the rest. 

There will also be a runoff the same day in the Gulf Coast area between Amy Lassiter St. Pé and Jennifer Schloegel for an open seat on the state Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals hears both criminal and civil cases that have been appealed from lower courts. The Mississippi Supreme Court can hear cases directly on appeal or can assign cases to the Court of Appeals.

Observers agreed that against the national legal backdrop, neither a Kitchens victory nor a Branning victory would lead to a seismic change since neither outcome would flip the court’s conservative lean. Still, a modest shift could impact some of the most controversial cases, such as a rare 5-4 decision that upheld the death sentence in Willie Manning’s case

A Kitchens win, coupled with Sullivan’s upset earlier this month, would deal the Republican Party rare setbacks in a state where it has been dominant and could put moderate forces in a position to grow their numbers further in future elections. 

“You might end up with a normal conservative court,” law professor Yeargain said, “instead of one of the most conservative courts in the country.”

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Mississippi Today

‘How can we stand by?’: Moms worry Medicaid cuts will hurt their children

Published

on

mississippitoday.org – Sophia Paffenroth – 2025-03-11 16:20:00

Advocates, Medicaid recipients and their family members gathered outside the Capitol Tuesday to urge both state and federal lawmakers to “protect and expand Medicaid now.” 

Speakers, who held signs with slogans such as “pro-life span,” included representatives from the Mississippi Coalition for Citizens with Disabilities, members of Care4Mississippi, parents of children on Medicaid and one 9-year-old girl. 

Their presence was in response to recent federal action that threatens Medicaid funding nationwide. In February, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a budget resolution that calls for the committee that oversees Medicaid and Medicare to cut $880 billion over 10 years. 

“This budget may not explicitly mention Medicaid, but the math is clear,” said Pam Dollar, executive director of the disability coalition. “Lawmakers cannot meet their aggressive cuts without slashing Medicaid or Medicare. Even if they cut everything unrelated to health care, they would still be $600 billion short. In a state that prides itself on being pro-life, how can we stand by and allow this to happen?”

There are currently over 600,000 Mississippians enrolled in the program. Medicaid covers half of Mississippi’s children, three in four of its nursing home residents and three in eight people with disabilities, according to KFF

Susan Stearns traveled from Oxford to speak at the rally. She’s used to driving – and routinely makes a two-hour round-trip car ride every time her son Oscar is in need of a pediatric specialist. 

Oscar and his twin were born prematurely, causing Oscar to develop cerebral palsy, a seizure disorder and blindness. The Stearns’ first medical bill from their sons’ stay in the neonatal intensive care unit was $5.7 million. 

Susan Stearns speaks during a press conference advocating to protect Medicaid at the Mississippi Capitol in Jackson, Miss., on Tuesday, March 11, 2025. Credit: Eric Shelton/Mississippi Today

Stearns, a professor at the University of Mississippi, and her husband work full-time and have private insurance, which does apply to Oscar – but doesn’t address the gamut of his needs. 

“Commercial insurance is designed for helping when you’ve broken a leg, or you need your gallbladder removed,” Stearns explained. “It is not prepared to deal with long-term, intensive care needs.”

Oscar accesses Medicaid through what’s called a disabled child living at home waiver, which helps pay for nursing care and therapy for Oscar during school. It also pays for equipment and services that allow the Stearns to give their son care at home. Without it, Oscar would need to go to a pediatric nursing home – of which there are currently none in Mississippi, though one is projected to open in Jackson later this year. 

“Without the waivers, where can these kids and their families look for the support they need?” Stearns asked. “How can their parents hope to keep their families together and their children happy and healthy? How will Mississippi have failed them?”

Luciana Pendleton, 9, shares her personal experience during a press conference advocating to protect Medicaid at the Mississippi Capitol in Jackson, Miss., on Tuesday, March 11, 2025. Credit: Eric Shelton/Mississippi Today

One 9-year-old girl named Luciana gave testimony of how Medicaid helps her. She’s aware that the conditions she has – including autism and ADHD – are expensive. She says Medicaid saved her life during her stay in the NICU and now helps pay for medication that helps her think. 

“If I didn’t have my medicines I’d feel like a blank piece of paper without any drawings,” she told the crowd. 

Since Mississippi has not expanded Medicaid, advocates fear that any cuts to the federal program will affect the poorest of the poor, pregnant women, children, seniors and those with disabilities in Mississippi. 

“It is long past time to stop using the most vulnerable to subsidize the least vulnerable,” said Jayne Buttross of the disability coalition. 

The group will hold another rally on the south steps of the Capitol on March 18 at 1 p.m. 

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Continue Reading

Mississippi Today

Feds ask Mississippi to repay $101 million in misspent welfare money

Published

on

mississippitoday.org – Anna Wolfe – 2025-03-11 14:20:00

The federal welfare agency is finally asking Mississippi for its money back – a long-anticipated next step in rectifying the state’s squandering of millions of tax dollars meant to reduce poverty.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services sent a penalty notice to Mississippi in December. The agency determined the state must pay back nearly $101 million in welfare money it says officials misused during former Gov. Phil Bryant’s administration.

The letter represents the first time since the scandal broke in 2020 that HHS has confirmed rules were broken when Mississippi spent welfare money on things such as building a volleyball stadium and a million-dollar public speaking contract with a celebrity athlete. HHS is the federal agency that oversees the $16.5-billion annual Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grants to states.

The Mississippi Department of Human Services, which administers the federal funds for the state and is still suing dozens of defendants over the misspending in ongoing civil litigation, has disputed the amount.

The welfare scandal took down a former state agency director, two nonprofit directors and a few others who pleaded guilty to federal crimes including fraud and bribery. They still await sentencing for their roles in the scheme, which involved diverting money from the poor to the pet projects of their friends, family and famous athletes.

But the penalty notice seeks administrative relief separate from criminal proceedings, signaling the next stage of the federal government’s response to the scandal.

The federal government used a combination of findings from the Office of State Auditor’s 2019 annual audit of federal funds released in May 2020 and a forensic audit commissioned by the state welfare agency released in October 2021 to arrive at a total penalty of $100,880,029.

The Office of Family Assistance inside HHS’s Administration for Children and Families is handling the matter for the federal government.

In response, Mississippi Department of Human Services Director Bob Anderson said he and the agency “appreciate the gravity of the suggested penalty,” but asked for additional time to fully respond.

“Through our ongoing discovery efforts, we have been attempting to validate the allowability or the misuse of a large portion of the funds,” Anderson wrote in a February letter. “Thus, it is the position of the agency that the amount of penalty proposed by OFA is based on insufficient information and is disputed by the agency.” 

The audits categorize misuse in several ways. Of the total $101 million, $12.5 million was deemed fraud, waste or abuse – primarily because of conflicts of interest or favoritism by former Mississippi Department of Human Services Director John Davis.

Most of the penalty instead consists of “unallowable” purchases. This is spending that either did not comply with federal regulations or did not come with proper documentation. The forensic audit notably lacked records to account for $40 million in TANF spent by Mississippi Community Education Center – the nonprofit at the center of some of the most attention-grabbing purchases – lumping the entire expenditure as a “questioned cost.”

Some purchases that make up the overarching welfare scandal figure may have been legal, but five years later, state officials are still seeking documentation to parse that out and potentially reduce the penalty.

Mississippi Today requested the penalty letter and response, as well as any other follow up communications, from the state welfare agency but was told any additional correspondence was exempt due to attorney-client privilege. 

“We can’t speak to ongoing negotiations in a legal matter,” said agency spokesperson Mark Jones.

The Mississippi Attorney General’s Office similarly would not comment. A spokesperson for the Governor’s Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Mississippi Today.

The notice from HHS was more than four years in the making, achieved right at the close of the Biden administration. Many of the top level officials at the Office of Family Assistance are no longer with the agency after Donald Trump took office in January.

Federal welfare officials had been holding off on making a request of repayment until they secured more information, or until getting clearance from the U.S. Department of Justice, which was conducting a parallel criminal investigation. 

“There are several ongoing federal and state investigations, which will likely mean a lengthy process before we can make our determination,” the federal agency told Mississippi Today in 2020, while Trump was still in his first term, “however, we are eager to come to a final penalty resolution and ensure that the state replaces any misused federal TANF funds with its own state fund.”

Federal prosecutors eventually charged five people in the welfare scandal: Davis, former professional wrestlers-turned-state contractors brothers Brett and Ted “Teddy” DiBiase, nonprofit director Christi Webb and Florida-based neuroscientist Jake Vanlandingham.

Separately, federal prosecutors charged nonprofit founder Nancy New and her son Zach New – operators of Mississippi Community Education Center – for defrauding the state of public education dollars.

Teddy DiBiase is the only one who has fought the federal charges. His trial was most recently set for this August, with additional delays possible.

The penalty Mississippi received is unprecedented. The rules around states doling out TANF funds to nonprofits are so lax, and the federal government’s authority to regulate the spending so weak, that states are rarely, if ever, held accountable for misspending. States have been penalized for failing to meet requirements for distributing direct cash to poor families, such as meeting a threshold for recipients who are working or come from two-parent households.

One expert said she was unaware of the federal government ever sending a penalty notice to a state for using TANF money on prohibited outside purchases.

“To the best of my knowledge this is the first one,” said Elizabeth Lower-Basch, a longtime economic justice advocate who has spent her career working on policy within TANF, including 10 years at the federal welfare agency.

The letter is one step in the federal government’s administrative process for recouping the funds and will result in a back and forth negotiation before the state must actually pay the penalty. 

“First, you may dispute the penalty … if you think the information or method that we used were in error or insufficient or that your actions in the absence of federal regulations, were based on a reasonable interpretation of the statute,” the letter from HHS reads.

Once negotiations are complete, the federal government will begin reducing the $86.5 million Mississippi is allotted in TANF money each year and require the state to make up the difference with state money until the penalty is paid.

Mississippi’s widespread TANF misspending was first revealed through arrests by the Office of State Auditor in February of 2020 after an eight-month investigation, starting with a tip that a former agency employee brought to Gov. Bryant in June of 2019 about an alleged kickback to Davis. The state had been approving as little as 2% of people applying for direct cash assistance through the TANF program, and while the recipient rolls dropped, private organizations received an unchecked windfall of money to provide ancillary services.

Annual audits of federal grant spending called the “single audit,” which the state auditor conducts on the federal government’s behalf each year, had not flagged the significant abuse that Davis and others were carrying out in the TANF program from 2016 to 2018. If not for the internal tip, it may have never been uncovered.

“HHS has very limited ability to research what states are doing that basically they’re required to rely on the state single audit for misuse of funds,” Lower-Basch said. “So unless something is directly brought to their attention, they’re not allowed to go poking into the state’s funds on their own.”

Meanwhile, this flexibility in TANF has not changed. Proposed federal rule changes to TANF published in 2023, which would have tightened regulations on how states could spend non-cash assistance funds, are dead after the Biden administration withdrew them last fall. 

“There are a lot of things I don’t think Congress intended for TANF to be used for, and in some cases I don’t think is the highest priority for the use of TANF funds, but it is lawful,” Lower-Basch said. “The idea that what very low-income people, who are struggling to keep their kids housed and fed and going to school, need is someone rich and famous telling them to work harder is disgusting, but it’s allowed.”

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Continue Reading

Mississippi Today

UMMC identifies three killed in helicopter crash

Published

on

mississippitoday.org – Simeon Gates – 2025-03-11 12:24:00

The University of Mississippi Medical Center has identified the three people killed in Monday’s helicopter crash. 

The two UMMC employees were Dustin Pope and Jakob Kindt, and the Med-Trans pilot was Cal Wesolowski. 

Kindt was a critical care paramedic from Tupelo.  Pope, a Philadelphia native, was a flight nurse and the base supervisor for AirCare in Columbus. Wesolowski was from Starkville.

The Federal Aviation Administration and the National Transport Safety Board are investigating the crash. Meanwhile, UMMC is temporarily halting its AirCare program and providing support to the passengers’ loved ones. 

Columbus-based AirCare 3, one of four helicopters UMMC leased from Med-Trans, had dropped off a patient and refueled for a return trip when it crashed shortly after noon in a heavily wooded area of Madison County near the Natchez Trace Parkway, killing all aboard.

“UMMC is offering support to the team members and families affected by this loss and will continue to support the AirCare and Mississippi Center for Emergency Services teams and Medical Center employees in any way possible,” according to a UMMC news release.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Continue Reading

Trending