Connect with us

Mississippi Today

House leaders tweak school funding plan after feedback from education groups

Published

on

House leaders said they have tried to address concerns of educators in their latest attempt to rewrite the longstanding formula that determines the amount of state funds provided to local school districts for their basic operation.

The latest version of the legislation, which passed the House Education Committee on Tuesday, includes an inflation factor and a committee that includes eight school superintendents that would make binding recommendations to the Legislature on the amount of money local school districts should receive. The committee also would include five representatives of the Mississippi Department of Education.

“This bill is as close to getting to equitable funding as we can get in this state,” said Education Chair Rob Roberson, R-Starkville, who is the primary author of the proposal dubbed the Investing in the Needs of Students to Prioritize, Impact and Reform Education (INSPIRE).

The legislation would replace the longstanding Mississippi Adequate Education Program, which was passed in 1997 but has been fully funded only twice since its full enactment in 2003. Proponents of the legislation say the new House proposal is more equitable than the Adequate Education Program, providing more funds for special education, for poor students and for those learning English as a second language.

But some public education advocates and others have long been wary of legislative efforts to rewrite the funding formula over concerns lawmakers want to gradually spend less money on schools.

READ MORE: The fate of the House school funding plan could come down to one question: Who wrote it?

House Education Vice Chair Kent McCarty, who also worked extensively on the INSPIRE proposal, said the program would pump almost as much money into education as MAEP if the current formula was fully funded.

MAEP, at full funding for the upcoming fiscal year, would cost $2.99 billion. INSPIRE’s total cost would be $2.96 billion.

The proposal passed the House Education Committee in a voice vote on Tuesday with no one voting against, though it was apparent that some members did not vote. The bill will be taken up by the full House in the coming days.

The Senate Education Committee, conversely, has passed legislation that “tweaks” the current MAEP, making it cost a little less to fully fund.

One member of the House Education Committee, Rep. Percy Watson, D-Hattiesburg, said of INSPIRE: “I don’t think I can support it. I am a supporter of the current program. We have a good formula with MAEP if we fund it.”

READ MORE: Education groups urge lawmakers to keep objective formula in place for school funding

Multiple education groups previously expressed concern that the House language did not include an objective criteria to determine the base student cost. MAEP’s base student cost is determined by factoring the cost to educate a child in an efficiently operated adequate school district. That formula is calculated every four years and during the intervening years a modest growth or inflation factor is added to the base student cost, and the school districts receive the base student costs times their average daily attendance. Under MAEP, poor districts receive more for the base student cost than more affluent districts do.

House leaders, in an effort to appease education advocates, tweaked the INSPIRE bill to include eight superintendents — half from large districts and half from small districts across the state — on a committee that would provide legislators a base student cost every four years. In intervening years, a modest inflation factor would be added to the base student cost.

McCarty said legislators should be held accountable for not fully funding education any year they do not provide the level of funding called for by the independent committee made up of local superintendents and Department of Education officials.

The base student cost in the House bill is set at $6,650 – about $800 less than the base student cost for MAEP for the upcoming year if it was fully funded. But the House bill adds significantly more money for those students deemed to cost more to educate.

McCarty pointed out that the Senate has proposed changes to the MAEP program that would make it generate about $40 million less for schools than would the House plan.

During the committee meeting, Watson asked if any out-of-state groups had worked with the House leadership in developing the plan. McCarty said he worked with Roberson, Rep. Jansen Owen, R-Poplarville, and other House members to develop the House bill without any input from out-of-state groups.

Mississippi Today reported earlier on Tuesday that outside groups that have advocated for vouchers and charter schools and other types of school choice in the past also worked on developing a rewrite of MAEP, and that rewrite included many of the same elements as the new House bill. Additionally, House leaders including McCarty have used a password protected website developed by those groups with the help of an out-of-state consulting group to run calculations of how much money varying versions of their newly proposed formula would produce per school district.

McCarty said that the sole purpose of the new formula is to equitably allocate funds and that the MAEP no longer does that, pointing out that the House bill provides extra help to poor school districts. Under the bill, some wealthier school districts would receive less funds than they got this past year when MAEP was underfunded about $175 million.

“We appreciate the improvements they have made to the bill,” said Nancy Loome of the Parents Campaign, who was among a group of educators who said any rewrite should include an objective formula. “But we still have big problems. For instance, it does not include an objective formula to determine the base student cost.”

READ MORESpeaker Jason White says House will work to scrap, rewrite public education funding formula

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Mississippi Today

Gloster residents protest Drax’s new permit request

Published

on

mississippitoday.org – Alex Rozier – 2024-11-15 13:33:00

GLOSTER — Drax, the United Kingdom-based wood pellet producer that’s violated air pollution limits in Mississippi multiple times, is asking the state to raise the amount of emissions it’s allowed to release from its facility in Gloster.

In September, the state fined Drax $225,000 for releasing 50% over the permitted limit of HAPs, or Hazardous Air Pollutants, from its facility Amite BioEnergy. In a pending permit application that it submitted to the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality in 2022, the company is seeking to transition from a “minor source” of HAPs to a “major source.”

A “major source” permit would remove the limit over the facility’s total HAP emissions, but it would apply a new limit over the rate at which Drax could release the pollutants.

This year’s fine was its second penalty for violating Mississippi law around air pollution limits. In 2020, the state fined the company $2.5 million for releasing over three times the legal threshold of Volatile Organic Compounds, or VOCs, one of the largest such fines in state history. Drax underestimated its VOC releases since the facility opened in 2016, but didn’t realize it until 2018. The facility didn’t come into compliance until 2021.

The Environmental Protection Agency lists a variety of potential health impacts from exposure to HAPs, including damage to the immune system and respiratory issues. VOCs can also cause breathing problems, as well as eye, nose and throat irritation, according to the American Lung Association.

About sixty people packed into a Gloster public library for MDEQ’s public hearing over Drax’s permit application on Nov. 14, 2024.

For years since Drax’s violations became public, nearby residents have attributed health issues to living near the facility. During a public hearing on Drax’s permit request Thursday in Gloster, attendees reiterated those concerns.

“We all experience headaches every day,” resident Christie Harvey said about her and her grandchildren. Harvey said she has asthma too, and her doctor was “baffled” by her symptoms. “Each week I have to take (my grandchildren) to the clinic for upper respiratory issues … It’s not fair that we have to go through this. Drax needs to lower the pollution as much as possible.”

Part of the public outcry is the proximity of people’s homes to the plant, which is within a mile of Gloster’s downtown.

A screenshot of Google Maps showing the location of Drax’s Amite BioEnergy facility relative to the rest of Gloster. The facility is within a mile of the downtown area.

“The wood pellet plant in Lucedale is situated in an industrial park outside of town,” Andrew Whitehurst of Healthy Gulf, an environmental group dedicated to protecting the Gulf of Mexico’s natural resources, said at the meeting. “The wood pellet plant that (Enviva is) trying to put in Bond will be situated north and west of the downtown area. Not like this when it’s right smack in the middle (of the city). It’s totally inappropriate. People can’t take it, they don’t deserve it.”

In a statement to Mississippi Today, Drax said it prioritizes the public health and environment in Gloster, adding that the permit modification is a part of standard business practice.

“When we first began operations, some of our original permits were not fit for purpose,” spokesperson Michelli Martin said via e-mail. “We are now working to acquire the appropriate permits for our operating output and to improve our compliance. Within these permits the requirements may change based on engineering data and industry standards. This permit modification is part of our ongoing plan to provide MDEQ with the most accurate data. Drax fully supports the resolution of our permitting request and looks forward to working with MDEQ to finalize the details.”

While researchers, including from Brown University, are studying the health symptoms of residents near the wood pellet plant, there is no proven connection between the facility’s emissions and those symptoms.

Erica Walker, a Jackson native who teaches epidemiology at Brown and who’s leading the study, spoke to Mississippi Today earlier this year. Regardless of the cause and effect, she said, the decision to put the plant near disadvantaged communities with poor health outcomes is concerning.

“We want to make sure we aren’t additionally burdening already burdened communities,” Walker said.

Operations resume at Drax in Gloster, Miss., on Friday, Feb. 16, 2024. Some Gloster residents are concerned with the industrial pollution caused by the company that produces wood pellets in the town. Credit: Eric J. Shelton/Mississippi Today

About 1,300 people live in the city, according to Census data, and 39% live below the poverty line.

Moreover, Gloster residents often have to travel hours, to cities such as McComb and Baton Rouge, to find the nearest medical specialist. Amite County, where Gloster is, has a higher rate of uninsured residents than the rest of the state, according to County Health Rankings, and the ratio of residents to primary care physicians is over three times greater in the county than Mississippi as a whole.

As part of its application, Drax is seeking a Title V permit under the Clean Air Act, which the EPA requires for major sources of air pollutants. This gives the EPA the opportunity to review Drax’s application and public comments submitted with it. The public can submit comments on the application until Nov. 26, and can do so through MDEQ’s website.

The Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board, which is made up of officials from several state agencies, will then decide whether or not to grant the new permits. A full overview of the process and Drax’s application is available online.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Continue Reading

Mississippi Today

Mississippi receives ‘F’ rating on preterm birth rate

Published

on

mississippitoday.org – Sophia Paffenroth – 2024-11-15 10:11:00

Mississippi received an F grade for its rate of preterm births in 2023 – those occurring before 37 weeks gestation – from the 2024 March of Dimes report card

Mississippi’s preterm birth rate was 15%, the worst in the country. Any state with a rate greater than 11.5% also received an F. The U.S. average was 10.4%. 

Preterm births in Mississippi have risen steadily over the last decade, increasingly nearly 2% since 2013. In Jackson, the state capital, nearly one in five babies are born preterm, according to the report. 

“As a clinician, I know the profound impact that comprehensive prenatal care has on pregnancy outcomes for both mom and baby,” Dr. Amanda P. Williams, interim chief medical officer at March of Dimes, said in a press release. “Yet, too many families, especially those from our most vulnerable communities, are not receiving the support they need to ensure healthy pregnancies and births. The health of mom and baby are intricately intertwined. If we can address chronic health conditions and help ensure all moms have access to quality prenatal care, we can help every family get the best possible start.” 

In addition to inadequate prenatal care, factors such as smoking, hypertension, diabetes and unhealthy weight can cause people to be more likely to have a preterm birth.

The report highlighted several other metrics, including infant mortality – in which Mississippi continues to lead the nation. 

In 2022, 316 babies in the state died before their first birthday. Among babies born to Black mothers, the infant mortality rate is 1.3 times higher. 

The state’s maternal mortality rate of 39.1 per 100,000 live births is nearly double the national average of 23.2.

Mississippi has yet to expand Medicaid – one of only 10 states not to do so – and tens of thousands of working Mississippians remain without health insurance. It also has not implemented paid family leave, doula reimbursement by Medicaid, or supportive midwifery policies – all of which March of Dimes says are critical to improving and sustaining infant and maternal health care.

The Legislature passed a law last session that would make timely prenatal care easier for expectant mothers, but more than four months after the law was supposed to go into effect, pregnant women still can’t access the temporary coverage.

“March of Dimes is committed to advocating for policies that make healthcare more accessible like Medicaid expansion, addressing the root causes of disparities, and increasing awareness of impactful solutions like our Low Dose, Big Benefits campaign, which supports families and communities to take proactive steps toward healthy pregnancies,” Cindy Rahman, March of Dimes interim president and CEO, said in a press release.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Continue Reading

Mississippi Today

On this day in 2017

Published

on

mississippitoday.org – Jerry Mitchell – 2024-11-15 07:00:00

Nov. 15, 2017

Credit: Simon & Schuster

Author Jesmyn Ward became the first Black American to win the National Book Award twice. 

Growing up in DeLisle, Mississippi, “I read everything,” she wrote. “Still, I still felt as if a part of me was wandering. That there was a figure in me, walking the desert, waiting for a word. A word that would sound out of the wilderness to declare that it was speaking to me, for me, within me. The sonic sear of that voice: a new knowing of not only the world I walked, but of me.” 

She became the first person in her family to go to college. She attended Stanford University, where she earned a bachelor’s in English and a master’s in media studies. 

When a drunken driver killed her younger brother, she decided to become a writer in his memory. 

After earning a master’s in fine arts in creative writing from the University of Michigan, she and her family were caught by the floodwaters of Hurricane Katrina, but managed to take shelter with a family. 

She won her first National Book Award for “Salvage the Bones,” which was set during the days of Katrina. 

“When I hear people talking about the fact that they think we live in a post-racial America,” she said, “it blows my mind, because I don’t know that place. I’ve never lived there.” 

She won her second National Book Award for “Sing, Unburied, Sing,” becoming the first woman and first Black American to win two National Book Awards. She also won a MacArthur “genius” grant, one of a handful of Mississippians to receive the award. In 2022, she became the youngest person to ever receive the Library of Congress Prize for American Fiction.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Continue Reading

Trending