News from the South - Georgia News Feed
Georgia Senate OKs bill to ban state workers from gender affirming care under state health plan • Georgia Recorder

Georgia Senate OKs bill to ban state workers from gender affirming care under state health plan
by Ross Williams, Georgia Recorder
February 11, 2025
State employees who use the state-sponsored health plan may soon be blocked from receiving gender-affirming care like hormone therapy.
The state Senate passed a bill Tuesday that aims to do just that. Before it can become law, it will need to pass the House by April 4 and be signed by Gov. Brian Kemp. If that happens, state employees who get gender-affirming care through the plan will have until the start of 2026 to find different coverage.
“When the state goes through its open enrollment period, we’re making clear to all state employees that we’re not gonna use state taxpayer dollars to pay for this gender-affirming care and transgender surgeries any longer,” said Senate Bill 39’s sponsor, Vidalia Republican Sen. Blake Tillery.
The bill would apply both to state employees on the plan as well as their minor children.
The state previously barred gender affirming care for minors, but Tillery said the bill is necessary because a loophole could allow parents to obtain banned treatments for their minor children by using the state plan.
“While the General Assembly has spoken and spoken clearly and said loudly we do not think that these surgeries should occur in our state, there’s a back door that’s happened here,” he said. “The back door that’s happened is, through settlements, court decisions and otherwise, we are paying for those surgeries, and we are allowing those surgeries on minors, and we’re not just allowing those surgeries on Georgia minors, we’re paying for those surgeries on Georgia minors. Transgender surgeries on Georgia minors, paid for with Georgia taxpayer dollars, but since we banned them in Georgia, guess where we pay for them at? Out of state.”
Tillery said he does not know how many times a minor Georgian may have gotten gender-affirming care out of state. Experts say surgeries are rarely even discussed as an option for minors, and standard care for a minor would be more likely to include therapy, social transitioning and hormone replacement.
Tillery was referring to Rich v. Georgia, a 2023 case where a group of state workers who were denied gender-affirming care sued the state. The state agreed to a $365,000 court settlement with three employees.
Senate Democrats argued that seeking to skirt the terms of that settlement would open the state up to new lawsuits.
“Our own attorney general made the call to settle Rich v. Georgia, because under his expert opinion, he knew that this would be a fight that the state could not win,” said Sen. Nikki Merritt, a Grayson Democrat.
Senate Minority Leader Harold Jones said the bill could likely also violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, citing two Georgia cases. In Bostock v. Clayton County, the U.S. Supreme court held that an employer who fires a worker simply for being gay or transgender is in violation of the law. In Lange v. Houston County, a district court ruled that a health insurance provider can be held liable under Title VII for denying coverage for gender-affirming care to a transgender employee because he or she is transgender. Houston County has appealed that decision to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals and the case is still ongoing.
“To me, the law is clearly illegal, quite frankly,” Jones said. “There’s no hope for the law to withstand any kind of constitutional challenge or Title VII challenge, especially when the law is clear – in our circuit. The 11th Circuit has addressed this issue. That Houston County case was a 2024 case, so it just actually did happen.”
LGBTQ advocates also worry that unlike previous bills that targeted transgender minors through medical or sports participation bans, this bill would also affect adults’ medical decisions.
“The proponents of SB39 have been dishonest and misleading by characterizing the bill as a measure that would primarily ban state coverage of gender affirming care for minors, while finally today, the sponsor of the bill admitted that he simply doesn’t want Georgia to provide best practice medical care for transgender adults,” said Human Rights Campaign Georgia State Director Bentley Hudgins.
“SB39 is a cruel health care ban that is unconstitutional, discriminatory and poses a real threat to medical freedom for all Georgians,” they added. “The government has no business stripping away medically necessary care from anyone, including transgender youth or adults. Once we concede that the government has this power, all of our care is at risk.”
How to treat transgender Georgians under the law remains a hot button issue this year, and, fresh off a convincing victory for President Donald Trump, GOP lawmakers may perceive that pressing the issue could help them with their base.
The Senate has already passed a ban on transgender girls playing on girls’ sports teams, and the House is set to put forward its own version. Lawmakers could also consider bills to ban puberty-blocking medications for transgender minors.
Trenton Republican Sen. Colton Moore, whose far-right positions and unconventional tactics have put him at odds with fellow Republicans, called the health care bill the “most effective and the most beneficial piece of legislation we have passed thus far in this body.”
“My friends on the Democratic side, they always like to talk about reproductive rights,”Moore said. “But we’re denying people reproduction for eternity if we trans their gender. That’s the basic foundation of a society is the family block. I believe taxpayer dollars ought to be used to promote a society, to grow a sovereignty, not to destroy it by using that money for transgender surgeries.”
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.
Georgia Recorder is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Georgia Recorder maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor John McCosh for questions: info@georgiarecorder.com.
The post Georgia Senate OKs bill to ban state workers from gender affirming care under state health plan • Georgia Recorder appeared first on georgiarecorder.com
News from the South - Georgia News Feed
Savannah State University police talk campus safety

SUMMARY: Savannah State University’s Police Chief Clarella Thomas, in her role for over a year, emphasizes enhancing campus safety protocols in light of recent school shootings. As a mother of college students, she understands parents’ concerns about safety. Encouraging the phrase “see something, say something,” she highlights community involvement in safety measures. Thomas’s team is upgrading emergency plans and promoting the emergency notification system, Everbridge. This summer, they’ll collaborate with external law enforcement for drills. Chief Thomas, alongside SSU’s new president, aims to improve security further, especially with the upcoming Orange Crush festival, restricting campus access to students only.
The post Savannah State University police talk campus safety appeared first on www.wsav.com
News from the South - Georgia News Feed
FSU shooting: Will the suspected gunman’s mother face charges?

SUMMARY: A 20-year-old Florida State University student, Phoenix Ikner, allegedly used a service weapon belonging to his mother, a sheriff’s deputy, to fatally shoot two men and injure six others at the university. Legal experts, including former Judge Elizabeth Scherer, indicated it’s too early to determine if his mother could face charges, depending on her knowledge of her son’s dangers and the weapon’s accessibility. While parents of juvenile shooters have faced charges in the past, the adult status of Ikner complicates potential liability. Investigators are still probing the case, with a motive yet to be disclosed.
The post FSU shooting: Will the suspected gunman's mother face charges? appeared first on www.wsav.com
News from the South - Georgia News Feed
ONLY ON 3: Man convicted of voluntary manslaughter says he deserves new trial

SUMMARY: Preston Oates, convicted of voluntary manslaughter and gun charges in the 2014 killing of Carlos Olivera, is seeking a new trial. Oates claims ineffective counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, and unexamined evidence during his trial. He continues to deny responsibility, arguing bias from law enforcement and improper handling of key evidence. Oates shot Olivera after a confrontation over a vehicle booting incident, with prosecutors stating he was the aggressor. Oates’ appeal was denied by the South Carolina Supreme Court, and his family and Olivera’s family were present at the hearing. The next hearing is scheduled for April 24.
The post ONLY ON 3: Man convicted of voluntary manslaughter says he deserves new trial appeared first on www.wsav.com
-
Local News7 days ago
Southern Miss Professor Inducted into U.S. Hydrographer Hall of Fame
-
News from the South - Alabama News Feed5 days ago
Foley man wins Race to the Finish as Kyle Larson gets first win of 2025 Xfinity Series at Bristol
-
News from the South - Alabama News Feed6 days ago
Federal appeals court upholds ruling against Alabama panhandling laws
-
News from the South - Texas News Feed7 days ago
1 dead after 7 people shot during large gathering at Crosby gas station, HCSO says
-
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed4 days ago
FDA warns about fake Ozempic, how to spot it
-
News from the South - Florida News Feed7 days ago
Jacksonville University only school with 2 finalist teams in NASA’s 2025 Human Lander Challenge
-
News from the South - Missouri News Feed4 days ago
Abandoned property causing issues in Pine Lawn, neighbor demands action
-
News from the South - Missouri News Feed2 days ago
Drivers brace for upcoming I-70 construction, slowdowns