fbpx
Connect with us

Kaiser Health News

Epidemic: Zero Pox!

Published

on

by
Tue, 15 Aug 2023 09:00:00 +0000

In 1973, Bhakti Dastane arrived in Bihar, India, to join the smallpox eradication campaign. She was a year out of medical school and had never cared for anyone with the virus. She believed she was offering something miraculous, saving people from a deadly disease. But some locals did not see it that way. 

Advertisement

Episode 3 of “Eradicating Smallpox” explores what happened when public health workers — driven by the motto “zero pox!” — encountered hesitation. These anti-smallpox warriors wanted to achieve 100% vaccination, and they wanted to get there fast. Fueled by that urgency, their tactics were sometimes aggressive — and sometimes, crossed the line. 

“I learned about being overzealous and not treating people with respect,” said Steve Jones, another eradication worker based in Bihar in the early ’70s. 

To close out the episode, host Céline Gounder speaks with NAACP health researcher Sandhya Kajeepeta about the reverberations of using coercion to achieve public health goals. Kajeepeta’s work documents inequities in the enforcement of covid-19 mandates in New York .  

The Host:

Céline Gounder
Senior Fellow & Editor-at-Large for Public Health, KFF Health

Advertisement


@celinegounder


Read Céline’s stories

Céline is senior fellow and editor-at-large for public health with KFF Health News. She is an infectious diseases physician and epidemiologist. She was an assistant commissioner of health in New York City. Between 1998 and 2012, she studied tuberculosis and HIV in South Africa, Lesotho, Malawi, Ethiopia, and Brazil. Gounder also served on the Biden-Harris Transition COVID-19 Advisory Board. 

In Conversation with Céline Gounder:

Sandhya Kajeepeta 
Epidemiologist and senior researcher with the NAACP’s Thurgood Marshall Institute

Advertisement


@SandhyaKaj

Voices from the Episode:

Bhakti Dastane
Gynecologist and former World Health Organization smallpox eradication program worker in Bihar, India

Steve Jones
Physican-epidemiologist and former smallpox eradication campaign worker in India, Bangladesh, and Somalia


@SteveJones322

Advertisement

Sanjoy Bhattacharya
Medical historian and professor of medical and global health histories at the of Leeds


@JoyAgnost

Click to open the transcript

Transcript: Zero Pox!

Advertisement

Podcast Transcript Epidemic: “Eradicating Smallpox” Season 2, Episode 3: Zero Pox! Air date: Aug. 15, 2023 

Editor’s note: If you are able, we encourage you to listen to the audio of “Epidemic,” which includes emotion and emphasis not found in the transcript. This transcript, generated using transcription software, has been edited for and clarity. Please use the transcript as a tool but check the corresponding audio before quoting the podcast. 

TRANSCRIPT 

Céline Gounder: When the World Health Organization set out to eradicate smallpox, enthusiastic young doctors and public health workers from all over the world showed up and spread out across the Indian subcontinent. 

Advertisement

We had the chance to speak with some of them …  

[Music begins] 

Yogesh Parashar: People never believed that the world would be free of smallpox, especially India. 

Larry Brilliant: There’s no reason to believe you could cure it. 

Advertisement

Alan Schnur: This is a terrible disease. 

Bill Foege: I was struck immediately by the smell. It was similar to a dead body. 

Yogesh Parashar: Any outbreak was an emergency. 

Bhakti Dastane: That itself was motivation for us. 

Advertisement

Chandrakant Pandav: I said, this is the time to serve my India. 

Larry Brilliant: We all seemed so confident that we could do it. 

Alan Schnur: That kept all of us in smallpox eradication working long hours under rigorous conditions. 

Chandrakant Pandav: It had to be done. 

Advertisement

Hardayal Singh: Our duty was to vaccinate each and every person by hook and by crook. 

[Music fades out] 

Céline Gounder: By hook or by crook, vaccinate everyone. These smallpox eradication workers had a shared sense of duty. And they had a slogan: “zero pox!” 

Bhakti Dastane: We have to achieve zero pox, so it was our motto: zero pox. 

Advertisement

Céline Gounder: That refrain … it became a way for workers to greet one another, even replacing the usual hellos. It was a constant reminder of their shared goal. 

Rajendra Deodhar: Whenever one Jeep crosses the other, we used to greet one another as “zero pox.” 

Céline Gounder: You’ve just heard the voices of Alan Schnur and Drs. Yogesh Parashar, Larry Brilliant, Bhakti Dastane, Bill Foege, Chandrakant Pandav, Hardayal Singh, and Rajendra Deodhar. We’ll be hearing more from each of them throughout this podcast season. 

So, this group of former eradication workers are grayer now. They’re mostly in their 70s. But you can still hear the youthful enthusiasm in their voices. You can feel that sense of purpose. 

Advertisement

This episode is about what happened when this zealous bunch encountered hesitation. 

Well, actually more than hesitation … real, everyday people, right in front of them, who were skeptical of the vaccine. 

And just how far would the eradication workers go to stop smallpox? 

I’m Dr. Céline Gounder, and this is “Epidemic.” 

Advertisement

[“Epidemic” theme music] 

Céline Gounder: By the early ’70s, smallpox was coming under control in most of the world. But in India, the disease remained stubbornly entrenched in several areas, including the state of Bihar — in the East. 

In some pockets of the region, a lot of people were skeptical about getting the vaccination. 

The eradication program sent in a stream of dedicated smallpox workers — on bicycles and in 4×4 trucks — to prowl the countryside and cities. 

Advertisement

Bhakti Dastane was among them. 

Bhakti Dastane: I’m Dr. Dastane, so I’m a gynecologist and I went to this, uh, WHO [World Health Organization] program, smallpox eradication program, when I was an intern. 

Céline Gounder: Bhakti answered the call in 1973. She was a year out of medical school, maybe 27 or 28 years old, and had never cared for anyone with smallpox. She had never even seen an actual smallpox case before. 

But she was inspired to and, when she arrived in Bihar, the program coordinators were surprised to see her.  They had been expecting a man. Bhakti and another female physician showed up instead. 

Advertisement

[Music starts] 

Bhakti Dastane: We were only two lady doctors on that program, the smallpox eradication program. So we have to show them that ladies also can do as good as the gents. 

Céline Gounder: Proving they were “as good as the gents” in almost every situation — that was their first task, the thing they had to do before they could get down to the work of finding patients. 

Bhakti and a team of about six to eight volunteers went house to house lugging vaccination kits, searching for people with smallpox and anyone they could vaccinate. 

Advertisement

Mostly, the men of the household didn’t even want to talk to a female doctor. 

Bhakti Dastane: This thing was very new for them, for any female to go and talk to the male people in the house. They don’t give the importance to the female. So they don’t open up and don’t share the things with you. So, it took some time to develop this, uh, trust in them. 

[Music ends] 

Céline Gounder:  In Bhakti’s mind, she was offering health to the people of Bihar, saving them from a deadly disease. 

Advertisement

But locals didn’t really see it that way. 

Some believed that if they accepted the vaccine, they would anger the Hindu goddess Shitala Mata, and some people from marginalized minority groups — including Muslims and the Indigenous Adivasi — had good reasons not to trust public health workers handing out unsolicited medical advice. 

Bhakti Dastane: My reaction was not to get angry. I knew this resistance is going to come. So, I was prepared to convince patiently. And I said, “OK, not today. I will come tomorrow also.” 

Céline Gounder: And, over time, she had some . 

Advertisement

One family patriarch thought vaccination was a curse — and told his family this: 

Bhakti Dastane: He said, “Don’t listen to her, even if you think she’s saying the right thing.” So, for that person, I said, “OK, I’ll leave it like this.” And then, next day, just went there, not to talk about the smallpox or anything, just spend a day with them. 

After three, four days, then he started listening to me. “OK. Now I think you are a good doctor, so, OK. What is it you want us to do?” 

Céline Gounder: What Bhakti wanted was to get his entire family vaccinated. And she did it. 

Advertisement

[Music comes up under Bhakti] 

Bhakti Dastane: And once you put a trust in one family, then the neighborhood also get convinced and then your work becomes easy. 

Céline Gounder: Building trust makes the work go easier. That’s a pillar in public health. 

But sometimes it can take months and even years to gain the trust of a community. And sometimes … there’s a tension between what’s expedient and what’s ethical. 

Advertisement

Health workers are supposed to be patient, but epidemics are not patient. 

Smallpox didn’t wait for trust and respect. It kept spreading. And lives were lost. 

The smallpox warriors wanted to get to zero pox. And they wanted to get there fast. 

Fueled by that urgency, their tactics were sometimes aggressive — and sometimes, crossed the line. 

Advertisement

[Music fades out] 

Céline Gounder: Passion and frustration collided for Bhakti when she was working in Patna, the capital of Bihar. 

People there would sometimes take off in the other direction as soon as they saw the vaccine volunteers.  

So, to keep the locals from fleeing, Bhakti added two uniformed police officers to her team. 

Advertisement

Bhakti Dastane: Two people, which were at the end of the road, so they couldn’t run away. 

Céline Gounder: She resorted to intimidation, Bhakti says. But not violence. 

Bhakti Dastane: Hold down and that, that I didn’t do. But scare them with the police or any other thing: “You have to do this, and you have to take this.” Up to that. But not physical force. I, I never used physical force. 

Céline Gounder: But other health workers did. 

Advertisement

Steve Jones: My name is T. Stephen Jones, and — I go by Steve Jones — and, I had the good fortune to work on smallpox eradication in three countries. 

Céline Gounder: Steve was a true believer. 

Steve Jones: The idea that you could get rid of this plague that had caused deaths and disfiguration over centuries was just such an astounding idea that I wanted to be able to say that I had been part of it. 

Céline Gounder: When he arrived in Bihar in 1974, there was so much work to do. 

Advertisement

[Music starts] 

Céline Gounder: Juggling more than a hundred different smallpox outbreaks at once. And for each case, he had to survey and vaccinate the 20 or 25 households surrounding the infected home.  

Steve says he did a lot to persuade people. Like, he vaccinated himself repeatedly to show it was safe. 

But there were times when the push for “zero pox” got the best of him. 

Advertisement

Steve Jones: I vaccinated a woman who was not willing to be vaccinated. I had a bifurcated needle and I held onto her arm, and I vaccinated her. And she resisted. 

Then the people of the village responded, and it got angry. And I was hit on the head and knocked to the ground. 

Céline Gounder: He ended up needing stitches. 

Steve Jones: I regret this, and I realized that I did the wrong thing, even if I hadn’t been bonked on the head. 

Advertisement

[Music fades out] 

Steve Jones: I was passionate and believed that it was a really important goal to achieve, and I made a mistake. 

I learned about being overzealous and not treating people with respect. 

Céline Gounder:  Bhakti Dastane says that she also came away with regrets about resorting to intimidation. 

Advertisement

Bhakti Dastane: Definitely using the force was not the proper thing to do, looking back now. But at that time, we were enthusiastic and trying to zero pox and so that a hundred percent vaccination. 

[Music starts] 

Céline Gounder: During the campaign in India, there were instances of not just coerced vaccination, but of physical force. 

Medical historian Sanjoy Bhattacharya is a professor of medical and global health histories at the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom.  

Advertisement

He says the Adivasi Indigenous people of India were among the most frequently vaccinated under duress. 

Sanjoy Bhattacharya: They were encircled, by often Indian paramilitaries or police forces, and then groups of Indian and overseas workers would go into these villages. 

Céline Gounder: A lot like the treatment of Indigenous people in the U.S., the Adivasi have been traditionally marginalized and exploited. Many of them were understandably suspicious of government health and of course vulnerable to coercion. 

Sanjoy Bhattacharya: Often kick down doors, often pull people from places they were hiding in and forcibly vaccinate them, literally sit on them and vaccinate them. 

Advertisement

[Music out] 

Céline Gounder: Today, around 50 years later, Sanjoy has spoken with villagers who still remember. 

Sanjoy Bhattacharya: They remember these pink, unfriendly — that is a terminology they use — pink, unfriendly people who would come in, shout at them, and not really engage them at all. I mean, what sort of leadership is that? 

Céline Gounder: Sanjoy rejects the idea that strong-arm tactics were somehow OK because of the urgency of the mission. 

Advertisement

Sanjoy Bhattacharya: Efficiency? By whose standard? None of us would like to be sat on by a 6--tall and rather heavy man. 

Céline Gounder: And, he says, in the long run, force is usually counterproductive, creating a ripple of pushback, which ends up being more costly than leaving people unprotected. 

[Music starts under Sanjoy] 

Sanjoy Bhattacharya: Any public health goal can be achieved without force. It needs engagement. It needs self-awareness; it needs humility. It needs money and time. 

Advertisement

Céline Gounder: Engagement takes time, and it’s built on trust. 

When we come back, epidemiologist and researcher Sandhya Kajeepeta will join us to talk about just that. 

Sandhya Kajeepeta: I remember in early 2020 seeing news stories of very violent arrests of Black New Yorkers for alleged violations of covid mandates that were extremely vague. 

Céline Gounder: That’s after the break. 

Advertisement

[Music out] 

Céline Gounder: By the end of April 2020, there had been over 18,000 covid deaths in New York City. I was working at a large public hospital in Manhattan — Bellevue. 

Remember, at that time, there’s still a lot we didn’t know. 

Our best advice was to tell everyone to stay home. 

Advertisement

In cities like New York, police were tasked with enforcing these new rules around social distancing and masking. 

But the results, they weren’t always good. 

[Music begins] 

Newscaster: The 33-year-old seen getting thrown to the ground and slapped repeatedly in what started as social distancing enforcement along Avenue D and East Ninth Street. 

Advertisement

Newscaster: It is the most recent incident involving the NYPD [New York Police Department] social distancing enforcement that has come under fire. 

[Music out] 

Céline Gounder: Seeing that footage of Black New Yorkers being arrested really upset me. 

And I wondered, was this enforcement doing more harm than good? 

Advertisement

I wanted to know. So, I talked about it with social epidemiologist Sandhya Kajeepeta. 

She studied how police enforced these rules and how it impacted public health during the first months of the pandemic. 

Sandhya Kajeepeta: In my neighborhood in Harlem, I would see huge numbers of police officers issuing citations and making arrests in response to these mandates. But if I went , to the southern part of Central Park, or to the West Village, I would see parks department employees handing out free masks. 

Céline Gounder: I definitely saw that too. Like, just walking to work at Bellevue Hospital, I’d see groups of people picnicking in Madison Square Park — unmasked. 

Advertisement

But I never saw the NYPD breaking up those gatherings. That was in a predominantly white neighborhood in midtown Manhattan. 

So, Sandhya, when you looked at summons and arrest data, how were the police enforcing those rules? 

Sandhya Kajeepeta: We found ultimately that neighborhoods in New York City with a higher percentage of Black residents also had a higher rate of pandemic policing. 

Céline Gounder: From your work we see that the enforcement of covid mitigation measures and mandates was unfair, but what about the public health results? Did these measures help curb infections? 

Advertisement

Sandhya Kajeepeta: There’s this really clear irony of trying to promote social distancing by instead increasing forced physical interactions between police and community members. And if people were held in jail because of a covid mandate violation, then they faced an even higher risk of covid infection, because the city’s jail was among the country’s top hot spots for coronavirus infections at this time. 

It seems very clear that this approach was antithetical to public health broadly and to curbing the spread of the virus. 

Céline Gounder: Yeah, and on top of that, it made people more skeptical about the pandemic safety measures we were recommending. 

Sandhya Kajeepeta: Yeah, I think there’s certainly a growing body of evidence documenting how police and criminal legal systems more broadly can erode trust in public institutions. 

Advertisement

Thinking about the covid pandemic, when I was seeing news coverage of police officers violently arresting and placing their knee on the neck of a Black man in New York, just for allegedly talking to someone too closely, or seeing footage of police forcing a Black woman to the ground in front of her child for allegedly wearing her mask improperly — that’s going to make me question whether public institutions really have our best interests in mind. 

I think anyone can see that and recognize that violence and punishment is not getting us to the goal of safeguarding public health and is quite clearly putting people at risk. 

Céline Gounder: There will be more epidemics and pandemics in our lifetimes. What would you like to see done differently when we see the next infectious disease outbreak? 

Sandhya Kajeepeta: I think the mandates themselves are such a powerful and important message to send to people, that, you know, we’re all working together, we all have an individual responsibility to control the spread of the virus. 

Advertisement

But I think when it was announced that police would be used to enforce these mandates, many people in New York City could very quickly predict what would happen, because we’ve seen this racialized pattern of policing be replicated time and time again. 

[“Epidemic” theme music begins] 

Trust in public institutions is such an important part of encouraging and motivating behavior change. But police enforcement can often have the opposite effect, of eroding that trust. 

Céline Gounder: Next time on “Epidemic” … 

Advertisement

 Tim Miner: Occasionally you have to park your motorcycle, take your shoes and socks off, and walk across a leech-infested paddy field to get to the next case. 

Céline Gounder: “Eradicating Smallpox,” our latest season of “Epidemic,” is a co-production of KFF Health News and Just Human Productions. 

Additional support provided by the Sloan Foundation. 

This episode was produced by Jenny Gold, Zach Dyer, Taylor Cook, and me. 

Advertisement

Our translator and local reporting partner in India was Swagata Yadavar. 

Taunya English is our managing editor. 

Oona Tempest is our graphics and photo editor. 

The show was engineered by Justin Gerrish. 

Advertisement

We had extra support from Viki Merrick. 

Music in this episode is from the Blue Dot Sessions and Soundstripe. We’re powered and distributed by Simplecast. 

This episode featured news clips from ABC7 New York and NBC 4 New York. 

If you enjoyed the show, please tell a friend. And leave us a review on Apple Podcasts. It helps more people find the show. 

Advertisement

Follow KFF Health News on Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok. 

And find me on Twitter @celinegounder. On our socials there’s more about the ideas we’re exploring on the podcasts. 

And subscribe to our newsletters at kffhealthnews.org so you’ll never miss what’s new and important in American , health policy, and public health news. 

I’m Dr. Céline Gounder. Thanks for listening to “Epidemic.” 

Advertisement

[”Epidemic” theme fades out] 

Credits

Taunya English
Managing Editor


@TaunyaEnglish

Taunya is senior editor for broadcast innovation with KFF Health News, where she leads enterprise audio projects.

Advertisement

Zach Dyer
Senior Producer


@zkdyer

Zach is senior producer for audio with KFF Health News, where he supervises all levels of podcast production.

Taylor Cook
Associate Producer

Advertisement


@taylormcook7

Taylor is associate audio producer for Season 2 of Epidemic. She researches, writes, and fact-checks scripts for the podcast.

Oona Tempest
Photo Editing, Design, Logo Art


@oonatempest

Advertisement

Oona is a digital producer and illustrator with KFF Health News. She researched, sourced, and curated the images for the season.

Additional Newsroom Support

Lydia Zuraw, digital producer Tarena Lofton, audience engagement producer Hannah Norman, visual producer and visual reporter Simone Popperl, broadcast editor Chaseedaw Giles, social media  Mary Agnes Carey, partnerships editor Damon Darlin, executive editor Terry Byrne, copy chief Chris Lee, senior communications officer 

Additional Reporting Support

Advertisement

Swagata Yadavar, translator and local reporting partner in IndiaRedwan Ahmed, translator and local reporting partner in Bangladesh

Epidemic is a co-production of KFF Health News and Just Human Productions.

To hear other KFF Health News podcasts, click here. Subscribe to Epidemic on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google, Pocket Casts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

Advertisement

Title: Epidemic: Zero Pox!
Sourced From: kffhealthnews.org/news/podcast/season-2-episode-3-zero-pox/
Published Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 09:00:00 +0000

Kaiser Health News

Harris’ California Health Care Battles Signal Fights Ahead for Hospitals if She Wins

Published

on

Bernard J. Wolfson and Phil Galewitz, KFF News
Mon, 05 Aug 2024 09:00:00 +0000

When Kamala Harris was California’s top prosecutor, she was concerned that mergers among hospitals, physician groups, and health insurers could thwart competition and lead to higher prices for . If she wins the presidency in November, she’ll have a wide range of options to blunt monopolistic behavior nationwide.

The Democratic vice president could influence the Federal Trade Commission and instruct the departments of Justice and Health and Human Services to prioritize enforcement of antitrust laws and channel resources accordingly. Already, the Biden administration has taken an aggressive stance against mergers and acquisitions. In his first year in office, President Joe Biden issued an executive order intended to intensify antitrust enforcement across multiple industries, including health care.

Under Biden, the FTC and DOJ have fought more mergers than they have in decades, often targeting health care deals.

Advertisement

“What Harris could do is set the tone that she is going to continue this laser focus on competition and health care prices,” said Katie Gudiksen, a senior health policy researcher at University of California College of the Law, San Francisco.

The Harris campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment.

For decades, the health industry has undergone consolidation despite government efforts to maintain competition. When health systems expand, adding hospitals and doctor practices to their portfolios, they often gain a large enough share of regional health care resources to command higher prices from insurers. That results in higher premiums and other health care costs for consumers and employers, according to numerous studies.

Health insurers have also consolidated in recent decades, leaving only a handful controlling most markets.

Advertisement

Health care analysts say it’s possible for Harris to slow the momentum of consolidation by blocking future mergers that could lead to higher prices and lower-quality care. But many of them agree the consolidation that has already taken place is an inescapable feature of the U.S. health care landscape.

“It’s hard to unscramble the eggs,” said Bob Town, an economics professor at the University of Texas.

There were nearly 1,600 hospital mergers in the U.S. from 1998 to 2017 and 428 hospital and health system mergers from 2018 to 2023, according to a KFF study. The percentage of community hospitals that belong to a larger health system rose from 53 in 2005 to 68 in 2022. And in another sign of market concentration, as of January, well over three-quarters of the nation’s physicians were employed by hospitals or corporations, according to a produced by Avalere Health.

Despite former President Donald Trump’s hostility to regulation as a candidate, his administration was active on antitrust efforts — though it did allow one of the largest health care mergers in U.S. history, between drugstore chain CVS Health and the insurer Aetna. Overall, Trump’s Justice Department was more aggressive on mergers than past Republican administrations.

Advertisement

Harris, as California’s from 2011 to 2017, jump-started health care investigations and enforcement.

“She pushed back against anticompetitive pricing,” said Rob Bonta, California’s current attorney general, who is a Democrat.

One of Harris’ most impactful decisions was a 2012 investigation into whether consolidation among hospitals and physician practices gave health systems the clout to demand higher prices. That probe bore fruit six years later after Harris’ successor, Xavier Becerra, filed a landmark lawsuit against Sutter Health, the giant Northern California hospital operator, for anticompetitive behavior. Sutter settled with the state for $575 million.

In 2014, Harris was among 16 state attorneys general who joined the FTC in a lawsuit to dismantle a merger between one of Idaho’s largest hospital chains and its biggest physician group. In 2016, Harris joined the U.S. Department of Justice and 11 other states in a successful lawsuit to block a proposed $48.3 billion merger between two of the nation’s largest health insurers, Cigna and Anthem.

Advertisement

Attempts to give the state attorney general the power to nix or impose conditions on a wide range of health care mergers have been fiercely, and successfully, opposed by California’s hospital industry. Most recently, the hospital industry persuaded state lawmakers to exempt for-profit hospitals from pending legislation that would subject private equity-backed health care transactions to review by the attorney general.

A spokesperson for the California Hospital Association declined to comment.

As attorney general of California, Harris’ work was eased by the state’s deep blue political hue. Were she to be elected president, she could face a less hospitable political , especially if control one or both houses of Congress. In addition, she could face opposition from powerful health care lobbyists.

Though it often gets a bad rap, consolidation in health care also confers benefits. Many choose to join large organizations because it relieves them of the administrative headaches and financial burdens of running their own practices. And being absorbed into a large health system can be a lifeline for financially troubled hospitals.

Advertisement

Still, a major reason health systems choose to expand through acquisition is to accumulate market clout so they can match consolidation among insurers and bargain with them for higher payments. It’s an understandable reaction to the financial pressures hospitals are under, said James Robinson, a professor of health economics at the University of California-Berkeley.

Robinson noted that hospitals are required to treat anyone who shows up at the emergency room, including uninsured people. Many hospitals have a large number of patients on Medicaid, which pays poorly. And in California, they face a of regulatory requirements, including seismic retrofitting and nurse staffing minimums, that are expensive. “How are they going to pay for that?” Robinson said.

At the federal level, any effort to blunt anticompetitive mergers would depend in part on how aggressive the FTC is in pursuing the most egregious cases. FTC Chair Lina Khan has made the FTC more proactive in this regard.

Last year, the FTC and DOJ jointly issued new merger guidelines, which suggested the federal government would scrutinize deals more closely and take a broader view of which ones violate antitrust laws. In September, the FTC filed a lawsuit against an anesthesiology group and its private equity backer, alleging they had engaged in anticompetitive practices in Texas to drive up prices.

Advertisement

In January, the agency sued to stop a $320 million hospital acquisition in North Carolina.

Still, many transactions don’t to the attention of the FTC because their value is below its $119.5 million reporting threshold. And even if it heard about more deals, “it is very underresourced and needing to be very selective in which mergers they ,” said Paul Ginsburg, a professor of the practice of health policy at the University of Southern California’s Sol Price School of Public Policy.

Khan’s term ends in September 2024, and Harris, if elected, could try to reappoint her, though her ability to do so may depend on which party controls the Senate.

Harris could also promote regulations that discourage monopolistic behaviors such as all-or-nothing contracting, in which large health systems refuse to do business with insurance companies unless they agree to include all their facilities in their networks, whether needed or not. That behavior was one of the core allegations in the Sutter case.

Advertisement

She could also seek policies at the Department of Health and Human Services, which runs Medicare and Medicaid, that encourage competition.

Bonta, California’s current attorney general, said that, while there are bad mergers, there are also good ones. “We approve them all the time,” he said. “And we approve them with conditions that address cost and that address access and that address quality.”

He expects Harris to bring similar concerns to the presidency if she wins.

This article was produced by KFF Health News, which publishes California Healthline, an editorially independent service of the California Health Care Foundation. 

Advertisement

——————————
By: Bernard J. Wolfson and Phil Galewitz, KFF Health News
Title: Harris’ California Health Care Battles Signal Fights Ahead for Hospitals if She Wins
Sourced From: kffhealthnews.org/news/article/kamala-harris-california-hospitals-health-care-antitrust-ftc/
Published Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2024 09:00:00 +0000

Continue Reading

Kaiser Health News

Urgent Care or ER? With ‘One-Stop Shop,’ Hospitals Offer Both Under Same Roof

Published

on

Phil Galewitz, KFF Health
Fri, 02 Aug 2024 09:00:00 +0000

JACKSONVILLE, . — Facing an ultracompetitive market in one of the nation’s fastest-growing cities, UF Health is trying a new way to attract : a combination emergency room and urgent care center.

In the past year and a half, UF Health and a private equity-backed company, Intuitive Health, have opened three centers that offer both types of care 24/7 so patients don’t have to decide which facility they need.

Instead, doctors there decide whether it’s urgent or emergency care —the health system bills accordingly — and inform the patient of their decision at the time of the service.

Advertisement

“Most of the time you do not realize where you should go — to an urgent care or an ER — and that triage decision you make can have dramatic economic repercussions,” said Steven Wylie, associate vice president for planning and business development at UF Health Jacksonville. About 70% of patients at its facilities are billed at urgent care rates, Wylie said.

Emergency care is almost always more expensive than urgent care. For patients who might otherwise show up at the ER with an urgent care-level problem — a small cut that requires stitches or an infection treatable with antibiotics — the savings could be hundreds or thousands of dollars.

While no research has been conducted on this new hybrid model, consumer advocates worry hospitals are more likely to route patients to costlier ER-level care whenever possible.

Advertisement

For instance, some services that trigger higher-priced, ER-level care at UF Health’s facilities — such as blood work and ultrasounds — can be obtained at some urgent care centers.

“That sounds crazy, that a blood test can trigger an ER fee, which can cost thousands of dollars,” said Cynthia Fisher, founder and chair of PatientRightsAdvocate.org, a patient advocacy organization.

For UF Health, the hybrid centers can increase profits because they help attract patients. Those patient visits can lead to more revenue through diagnostic testing and referrals for specialists or inpatient care.

Advertisement

Offering less expensive urgent care around-the-clock, the hybrid facilities stand out in an industry known for its aggressive billing practices.

On a recent visit to one of UF Health’s facilities about 15 miles southeast of downtown, several patients said in interviews that they sought a short wait for care. None had sat in the waiting room more than five minutes.

“Sometimes urgent care sends you to the ER, so here you can get everything,” said Andrea Cruz, 24, who was pregnant and came in for shortness of breath. Cruz said she was being treated as an ER patient because she needed blood tests and monitoring.

“It’s good to have a place like this that can treat you no matter what,” said Penny Wilding, 91, who said she has no regular physician and was being evaluated for a likely urinary tract infection.

Advertisement

UF Health is one of about a dozen health in 10 states partnering with Intuitive Health to set up and hybrid ER-urgent care facilities. More are in the works; VHC Health, a large hospital in Arlington, Virginia, plans to start building one this year.

Intuitive Health was established in 2008 by three emergency physicians. For several years the company ran independent combination ER-urgent care centers in Texas.

Then Altamont Capital Partners, a multibillion-dollar private equity firm based in Palo Alto, California, bought a majority stake in Intuitive in 2014.

Soon after, the company began partnering with hospitals to open facilities in states Arizona, Indiana, Kentucky, and Delaware. Under their agreements, the hospitals handle medical staff and billing while Intuitive manages administrative functions — including initial efforts to collect payment, including checking insurance and taking copays — and nonclinical staff, said Thom Herrmann, CEO of Intuitive Health.

Advertisement

Herrmann said hospitals have become more interested in the concept as Medicare and other insurers pay for value instead of just a fee for each service. That means hospitals have an incentive to find ways to treat patients for less.

And Intuitive has a strong incentive to partner with hospitals, said Christine Monahan, an assistant research professor at the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown : Facilities licensed as freestanding emergency rooms — as Intuitive’s are — must be affiliated with hospitals to be covered by Medicare.

At the combo facilities, emergency room specialists determine whether to bill for higher-priced ER or lower-priced urgent care after patients undergo a medical screening. They compare the care needed against a list of criteria that trigger emergency-level care and bills, such as the patient requiring IV fluids or cardiac monitoring.

Inside its combo facilities, UF posts a sign listing some of the urgent care services it offers, including treatment for ear infections, sprains, and minor wounds. When its doctors determine ER-level care is necessary, UF requires patients to sign a form acknowledging they will be billed for an ER visit.

Advertisement

Patients who opt out of ER care at that time are charged a triage fee. UF would not disclose the amount of the fee, saying it varies.

UF say patients pay only for the level of care they need. Its centers accept most insurance plans, including Medicare, which covers people older than 65 and those with disabilities, and , the program for low-income people.

But there are important caveats, said Fisher, the patient advocate.

Patients who pay cash for urgent care at UF’s hybrid centers are charged an “all-inclusive” $250 fee, whether they need an X-ray or a rapid strep test, to name two such services, or both.

Advertisement

But if they use insurance, patients may have higher cost sharing if their health plan is charged more than it would pay for stand-alone urgent care, she said.

Also, federal surprise billing protections that shield patients in an ER don’t extend to urgent care centers, Fisher said.

Herrmann said Intuitive’s facilities charge commercial insurers for urgent care the same as if they provided only urgent care. But Medicare may pay more.

While urgent care has long been intended for minor injuries and illnesses and ERs are supposed to be for life- or health-threatening conditions, the two models have melded in recent years. Urgent care clinics have increased the scope of injuries and conditions they can treat, while hospitals have taken to advertising ER wait times on highway billboards to attract patients.

Advertisement

Intuitive is credited with pioneering hybrid ER-urgent care, though its facilities are not the only ones with both “emergency” and “urgent care” on their signs. Such branding can sometimes confuse patients.

While Intuitive’s hybrid facilities offer some price transparency, providers have the upper hand on cost, said Vivian Ho, a health economist at Rice University in Texas. “Patients are at the mercy of what the hospital tells them,” she said.

But Daniel Marthey, an assistant professor of health policy and management at Texas A&M University, said the facilities can help patients find a lower-cost option for care by avoiding steep ER bills when they need only urgent-level care. “This is a potentially good thing for patients,” he said.

Marthey said hospitals may be investing in hybrid facilities to make up for lost revenue after federal surprise medical billing protections took effect in 2022 and restricted what hospitals could charge patients treated by out-of-network providers, particularly in emergencies.

Advertisement

“Basically, they are just competing for market share,” Marthey said.

UF Health has placed its new facilities in suburban areas near freestanding ERs owned by competitors HCA Healthcare and Ascension rather than near its downtown hospital in Jacksonville. It is also building a fourth facility, near The Villages, a large retirement community more than 100 miles south.

“This has been more of an offensive move to expand our market reach and go into suburban markets,” Wylie said.

Though the three centers are not state-approved to care for trauma patients, doctors there said they can handle almost any emergency, including heart attacks and strokes. Patients needing hospitalization are taken by ambulance to the UF hospital about 20 minutes away. If they need to follow up with a specialist, they’re referred to a UF physician.

Advertisement

“If you fall and sprain your leg and need an X-ray and crutches, you can here and get charged urgent care,” said Justin Nippert, medical director of two of UF’s combo centers. “But if you break your ankle and need it put back in place it can get treated here, too. It’s a one-stop shop.”

——————————
By: Phil Galewitz, KFF Health News
Title: Urgent Care or ER? With ‘One-Stop Shop,’ Hospitals Offer Both Under Same Roof
Sourced From: kffhealthnews.org/news/article/urgent-emergency-care-combo-centers-intuitive-health-jacksonville-florida/
Published Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 09:00:00 +0000

Did you miss our previous article…
https://www.biloxinewsevents.com/since-fall-of-roe-self-managed-abortions-have-increased/

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Kaiser Health News

Since Fall of ‘Roe,’ Self-Managed Abortions Have Increased

Published

on

Sarah Varney, KFF News
Fri, 02 Aug 2024 09:00:00 +0000

The percentage of people who say they’ve tried to end a pregnancy without medical assistance increased after the Supreme Court overturned . That’s according to a study published Tuesday in the online journal JAMA Network Open.

Tia Freeman, a reproductive health organizer, workshops for Tennesseans on how to safely take medication abortion pills outside of medical settings.

Abortion is almost entirely illegal in Tennessee. Freeman, who lives near Nashville, said people planning to stop pregnancies have all sorts of reasons for wanting to do so without from the formal health care system — the cost of traveling to another state, of finding child care, and fear of lost wages.

Advertisement

“Some people, it’s that they don’t have the networks in their families where they would need to have someone drive them to a clinic and then sit with them,” said Freeman, who works for Self-Managed Abortion; Safe and Supported, a U.S.-based project of Women Help Women, an international nonprofit that advocates for abortion access.

“Maybe their family is superconservative and they would rather get the pills in their home and do it by themselves,” she said.

The new study is from Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, a research group based at the University of California-San Francisco. The researchers surveyed more than 7,000 people ages 15 to 49 from December 2021 to January 2022 and another 7,000-plus from June 2023 to July 2023.

Of the respondents who had attempted self-managed abortions, they found the percentage who used the abortion pill mifepristone was 11 in 2023 — up from 6.6 before the Supreme Court ended federal abortion rights in 2022.

Advertisement

One of the most common reasons for seeking a self-administered abortion was privacy concerns, said a study co-author, epidemiologist Lauren Ralph.

“So not wanting others to know that they were seeking or in need of an abortion or wanted to maintain autonomy in the decision,” Ralph said. “They liked it was something under their control that they could do on their own.”

Kristi Hamrick, vice president of media and policy at for Action, a national anti-abortion group, said she doesn’t believe the study findings, which she said benefit people who provide abortion pills.

“It should surprise no one that the abortion lobby reports their business is doing well, without problems,” Hamrick said in an emailed statement.

Advertisement

Ralph said in addition to privacy concerns, state laws criminalizing abortion also weighed heavily on women’s minds.

“We found 6% of people said the reason they self-managed was because abortion was illegal where they lived,” Ralph said.

In the JAMA study, women who self-managed abortion attempts reported using a range of methods, including using drugs or alcohol, lifting heavy objects, and taking a hot bath. In addition, about 22% reported themselves in the stomach. Nearly 4% reported inserting an object in their body.

The term “self-managed abortion” may conjure images of back-alley procedures from the 1950s and ’60s. But OB-GYN Laura Laursen, a family planning physician in Chicago, said self-managed abortions using medication abortion — the drugs mifepristone and misoprostol — are far safer, whether done inside or outside the health care system.

Advertisement

“They’re equally safe no matter which way you do it,” Laursen said. “It involves passing a pregnancy and bleeding, which is what happens when you have a miscarriage. If your body doesn’t have a miscarriage on its own, these are actually the medications we give women to pass the miscarriage.”

Since Roe‘s end, more than 20 states have banned or further restricted abortion.

——————————
By: Sarah Varney, KFF Health News
Title: Since Fall of ‘Roe,’ Self-Managed Abortions Have Increased
Sourced From: kffhealthnews.org/news/article/self-managed-abortions-increase-post-roe-dobbs-privacy-concerns/
Published Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 09:00:00 +0000

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending