Connect with us

The Center Square

Environmental groups urge Louisiana officials to oppose One Lake Project | Louisiana

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Jacob Mathews | The Center Square – 2024-06-25 11:50:00

(The Center Square) — Louisiana officials heard from groups opposed to a taxpayer-funded flood control lake on the Pearl River in Jackson, Mississippi on Tuesday.

The Lower Pearl River Basin Task Force in Louisiana held a hearing to hear about the potential environmental impacts on the project, which a draft environmental impact statement says could cost up to $2.1 billion.   

Andrew Whitehurst, a representative from Healthy Gulf, a program dedicated to preserving the Gulf’s natural resources, argued the One Lake Project would adversely affect Pearl River and its habitats through Mississippi and Louisiana. 

According to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the river drains an area of 8,760 square miles consisting of all, or parts, of 23 counties in Mississippi and parts of three Louisiana parishes. The Corps is hosting a comment period on the project that will end on July 22. 

Along with three meetings in Mississippi, the Corps will host a meeting in Slidell on July 11 at 11 a.m. at the Slidell Municipal Auditorium. 

A draft environmental impact statement issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on June 7 indicated while that the agency wouldn’t support the full One Lake project, it would support other flood control measures that could include a smaller lake. 

The Rankin-Hinds Drainage District, an entity of the state of Mississippi created to prevent flooding in the two counties, supports the project. District officials say the lake would not only prevent flooding in Jackson, but provide an urban waterfront that would increase city revenues and provide recreational opportunities. 

However, Whitehurst says the dredging and damming required to create the lake would cause wetland and wildlife habitat destruction that would be extremely environmentally damaging. 

Whitehurst said the dredging near toxic waste sites might loosen some slurry and leachate down the river system. He also said the lives of multiple turtle and fish species whose habitat near the current banks would be endangered. 

A project to fix the flooding in the area has been in talks for years and the One Lake Project has been working its way through committees and boards since 2011, according to Pearl River Keeper’s website, an organization devoted to preserving the Pearl River.

Louisiana lawmakers, representing constituents that could face downstream effects from One Lake, were opposed to this project as recently as 2018. Whitehurst urged the task force to recommend a new statement from the Legislature against the project due to the urgency of its decision. 

“It’s desired that this whole process wrap up with a record of decision on this EIS this fall. They’re not waiting,” Whitehurst said. 

Whitehurst also suggested that there is not enough economic explanations made to justify the impact to businesses on the river. 

“It’s something that they’re worried about,” Whitehurst said of those businesses who rely on the river remaining in its original state. “There’s not a cost or economic appendix released with this document. That’s one of the first things we looked for.”

Healthy Gulf says a combination of levee setbacks to widen a constricted floodplain, plus some improvements to existing levees along with floodplain buyouts could be employed to relieve flooding in Jackson without blocking the channel, destroying habitats or causing flow problems downstream. The Rankin-Hinds Drainage District has opposed this plan, saying it would be too expensive. 

Read More

The post Environmental groups urge Louisiana officials to oppose One Lake Project | Louisiana appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

News from the South - Florida News Feed

DeSantis lauds improvements in Florida school accountability ratings | Florida

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Steve Wilson | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-07 14:30:00


The Florida Department of Education released accountability scores showing no school districts failed. The percentage of A-rated schools rose from 38% in 2024 to 44% in 2025, while failing schools dropped by 39.3% to 71. Only 2.05% of 3,451 public schools received failing grades. High schools had 49% A ratings, middle schools 42%, and elementary schools 40%. Districts saw 28 A’s, 31 B’s, and 8 C’s. Progress monitoring reforms continue to improve performance. Education Commissioner Anastasios Kamoutsas highlighted gains in civics, with 70% of students on grade level, crediting Governor DeSantis’s policies focused on basics and student success.

(The Center Square) – The Florida Department of Education released its accountability scores for individual public schools and districts on Monday and no school district received a failing score. 

Grades for individual schools were also up, as the number of A-rated schools increased from 38% in 2024 to 44% this year and the number of failing schools decreased from 117 to 71, a decrease of 39.3%. 

It marked the third year for Florida’s progress monitoring, which continually assesses student and school performance throughout the school year rather than with one end of the year test. 

“I think the progress monitoring reform was the right reform to do,” Gov. Ron DeSantis said at an event at Oceanway Elementary School in Jacksonville, which improved from a C to an A. “I think it is providing dividends, but we all say we have more work to do.” 

Only 71 out of Florida’s 3,451 public schools (2.05%) received a failing grade (a D or an F), with 44% of them receiving an A and 27% received a B. 

There were only 49 elementary, six middle and only two high schools that received unsatisfactory scores. A scores were awarded to 49% of high schools (250), 42% of middle schools (237) and 40% of the state’s elementaries (717).

Of the state’s combined schools, 322 (55%) earned top ratings and only 14 received failing marks. 

For districts, 28 scored an A, 31 received a B and only eight received a C. 

Florida Department of Education Commissioner-designate Anastasios Kamoutsas, who replaced Manny Diaz Jr., spotlighted the improvement in civics education with 70% of Florida students on grade level in that subject. 

“Florida schools are improving across the board, and this is a direct result of the governor’s innovative policies and his mandate to school board members and superintendents across the state to bring education back to the basics and focus on student success,” Kamoutsas said. “Indoctrination, whether it’s critical race theory or sexually explicit materials, has no place in Florida schools.”

Diaz is now the interim president of the University of West Florida in Pensacola. 

The state Department of Education uses 12 components to assess individual school performance, which include achievement components, learning gains, middle school acceleration, graduation rate and college and career acceleration. 

The post DeSantis lauds improvements in Florida school accountability ratings | Florida appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article primarily reports on Florida’s Department of Education accountability scores and highlights improvements in school ratings with factual data. However, the inclusion and framing of remarks from Governor Ron DeSantis and Commissioner-designate Anastasios Kamoutsas introduce a clear ideological perspective associated with recent Florida education policies. The language used, particularly Kamoutsas’ statements opposing “indoctrination” and terms like “critical race theory” and “sexually explicit materials,” aligns with the education policy agenda promoted by conservative and right-leaning political figures. While the article provides factual information, the selection and emphasis of quotations and policy framing suggest a right-leaning bias that implicitly supports the current administration’s educational reforms and ideological stance on school content. The coverage does not merely report on these ideological positions neutrally but appears to endorse or positively highlight them.

Continue Reading

The Center Square

Here are the violent criminals Judge Murphy tried to block from deportation | Massachusetts

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Bethany Blankley – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-07 09:21:00


A federal judge in Massachusetts, Brian Murphy, attempted to block deportation of violent criminal foreign nationals but was overruled by the U.S. Supreme Court. On July 4, eight convicted felons from countries including Burma, Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Vietnam, and South Sudan were deported to South Sudan under new agreements allowing detention of criminal foreign nationals. These individuals had extensive criminal records and final removal orders but remained in the U.S. due to previous diplomatic refusals by their home countries. Justice Elena Kagan affirmed the Trump administration’s authority to deport such criminals, rejecting Murphy’s injunction that contradicted federal law.

(The Center Square) – A federal district judge in Massachusetts, Judge Brian Murphy, sought to prevent deportation of violent criminals but was overruled by the U.S. Supreme Court.

On July 4, eight convicted felons, citizens of Burma, Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Vietnam and South Sudan, were deported to South Sudan. The country’s leaders have entered into an agreement with the U.S. to detain criminal foreign nationals, including those who aren’t their citizens. El Salvador and others have entered into similar agreements, with the U.S. government agreeing to pay for detention costs.

U.S. deportation efforts rely on diplomacy with foreign governments, many of which won’t accept their own citizens. Under previous administrations, federal efforts to deport criminal illegal foreign nationals failed because many countries wouldn’t take back their citizens. As a result, they illegally remained in the U.S. even though they had deportation orders from a federal immigration judge, authorities have explained to The Center Square. Under the Trump administration, this has changed.

Those deported to South Sudan were all men illegally in the U.S. with extensive criminal histories, including felony convictions and prison sentences in the U.S. They all received due process in federal immigration court and received final removal orders from federal immigration judges that were never enforced, including one dating back to 1999.

Burmese national Kyaw Mya was convicted of lascivious acts with a child-victim under age 12 and sentenced to 10 years in prison and paroled after four years. ICE- St. Paul officers arrested him; his final removal order was issued March 17, 2022.

Burmese national Nyo Myint was convicted of first-degree sexual assault involving a victim mentally and physically incapable of resisting and sentenced to 12 years in prison. He was also charged with aggravated assault-nonfamily strongarm and a registered sex offender. ICE- St. Paul officers arrested him; his final removal order was issued August 17, 2023.

Cuban national Enrique Arias-Hierro was convicted of homicide, armed robbery, false impersonation of official, kidnapping, and robbery strong arm. His final removal order was issued September 13, 1999. Due to Cuban authorities refusing to take him, he remained illegally in the U.S.

Cuban national Jose Manuel Rodriguez-Quinones was convicted of attempted first-degree murder with a weapon, battery and larceny, and cocaine possession and trafficking. ICE Miami officers arrested him in April; his final removal order was issued Dec. 4, 2012.

Laos national Thongxay Nilakout was convicted of first-degree murder and robbery and sentenced to life in prison. ICE Los Angeles officers arrested him in January. His final removal order was issued July 12, 2023.

Mexican national Jesus Munoz-Gutierrez was convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison. ICE Miami officers arrested him in May. His final removal order was issued June 16, 2005.

Vietnamese national Tuan Thanh Phan was convicted of first-degree murder and second-degree assault and sentenced to 22 years in prison. ICE Seattle officers arrested him in May. His final removal order was issued June 17, 2009.

The only South Sudan national in the deportation group was Dian Peter Domach, who was first encountered by ICE in 2011 and received a final removal order on July 19, 2011. He wasn’t deported and remained in the U.S. illegally and committed a range of crimes. He was convicted of robbery and possession of a firearm, possession of defaced firearm, possession of burglar’s tools, and driving under the influence.

Murphy, born in 1979, a former public defender and a criminal defense attorney, was appointed by former President Joe Biden less than six months ago. Murphy argued a Supreme Court ruling didn’t apply to his injunction, seeking to keep convicted felons, including sex offenders and murderers, in the U.S. in violation of federal law. His order violated due process, critics argue, because the convicted felon illegal foreign nationals already appeared multiple times before federal immigration judges who issued judgements against them and final orders of removal.

Justice Elena Kagan chastised Murphy in the court’s July 3 ruling, affirming the Trump administration’s authority to deport illegal foreign nationals to third-party countries.

The post Here are the violent criminals Judge Murphy tried to block from deportation | Massachusetts appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article predominantly presents facts about the deportation of convicted foreign criminals and the associated legal proceedings, but it is framed in a manner that aligns with a law-and-order, tough-on-crime perspective commonly associated with right-leaning viewpoints. The language emphasizes the criminality of the individuals, the failure of previous administrations (implicitly the Biden administration) to enforce deportations effectively, and the positive framing of the Trump administration’s policies as a corrective measure. The piece also characterizes Judge Murphy’s injunction as an obstruction of justice and highlights criticism of his ruling, which reflects a particular ideological stance favoring stricter immigration enforcement and portrays judicial resistance as misguided. While it reports on judicial and executive actions, the tone and selective details contribute to a bias that leans toward supporting hardline immigration enforcement policies typical of conservative perspectives, rather than maintaining strictly neutral or centrist reporting.

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Elon’s America Party could be on North Carolina ballots in 2026 midterms | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-07 07:52:00


On Independence Day, Elon Musk proposed creating the America Party as an alternative to the traditional two-party system, supported by a social media poll showing 2-1 favorability. For recognition in North Carolina, the party must meet criteria such as achieving 2% of votes in the last general election, collecting signatures from 0.25% of registered voters by May 16, or fielding candidates in 70% of states during presidential elections. The America Party could qualify for the 2025 municipal elections. Musk’s platform emphasizes debt reduction, tech advancement, free speech, and centrist policies. Currently, four parties are recognized in North Carolina, with a large unaffiliated voting bloc.

(The Center Square) – After an Independence Day question on his social media platform, the world’s richest man offered Americans an alternative political party independent of Democrats and Republicans.

For North Carolinians, that means one of three criteria will have to be met before the America Party – or any other creations – can be officially recognized for purposes of being on the ballots.

Musk, a 53-year-old space and automotive industry phenom, served Republican second-term President Donald Trump in the Department of Government Efficiency. Reviews were mixed. On Friday, the 249th celebration of the Fourth of July, Musk asked on social media, “Independence Day is the perfect time to ask if you want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system! Should we create the America Party?”

His poll, he reported the next day, was 2-1 in favor and he wrote, “Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.”

Registration with the Federal Election Commission would be necessary on the national level.

For recognition by the North Carolina State Board of Elections, as outlined in the General Statutes, the three ways involve the options of a party’s voters getting at least 2% of the entire vote cast in the most recent general election; signature petition of at least 0.25% of all registered voters who voted in the most recent gubernatorial election; or a group of voters showing documentation the group had their candidate on the general election ballot in 70% of the states (35) in the most recent presidential election.

The first and third of those are moot at this point; the America Party was not in existence for the 2024 cycle. In fact, Musk was a significant campaign piece for Trump.

For petitions, they must be filed with the state board before noon on June 1 of the year of the election the party wishes to participate in. There’s also a stipulation that, so that counties can verify, the signatures must go to them 15 days before being due to the state. That’s May 16.

The 2025 cycle is known as municipal elections in the state, and 2026 is the midterms – second-longest ballot of the four cycles for the state. The America Party could get into place for next year.

Last year’s governor’s race drew 5,591,547 votes among Democrat Josh Stein, Republican Mark Robinson, Libertarian Mike Ross, Vinny Smith (Constitution Party) and Wayne Turner (Green Party). A quarter of 1% would be 13,979 (rounded up).

More than once, Musk reposted a question on party platform that listed reduce debt, responsible spending only; modernize military with artificial intelligence/robotics; pro tech, accelerate to win in artificial intelligence; less regulation across the board but especially in energy; free speech; “pro natalist,” a form of pronatalism or belief in human reproduction and a high birth rate; and centrist policies everywhere else.

Among other posts through the weekend from Musk, estimated Monday morning by Forbes at more than $405 billion, was one that included the following:

• Tesla will never succeed.

• Elon can’t start a space company.

• Neuralink will never work.

• SpaceX will never reuse a rocket.

• Elon can’t run a social media.

Three political parties lost recognition through the last cycle and North Carolina has four recognized today. Alphabetically, they are the Democratic Party, the Green Party, the Libertarian Party, and the Republican Party.

By registrations through Saturday, those unaffiliated (more than 2.8 million, or 38.3%) have the largest bloc, followed by Democrats (2.3 million, or 30.6%), Republicans (nearly 2.3 million, or 30.4%), Libertarians (only 45,986, or 0.6%) and Green (just 4,024, or 0.05%).

The post Elon’s America Party could be on North Carolina ballots in 2026 midterms | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article predominantly reports factual information about Elon Musk’s recent social media initiative to form a new political party called the America Party, outlining the legal requirements for new party recognition in North Carolina, voter registration statistics, and Musk’s political background. The tone is neutral, presenting Musk’s statements and related voting data without emotive or persuasive language. While it includes references to Musk’s own political history and platform ideas, it does so descriptively rather than endorsing or criticizing them. The article balances coverage of multiple parties and election rules, adhering to straightforward reporting rather than promoting an ideological stance, thus maintaining a centrist, neutral perspective.

Continue Reading

Trending