(The Center Square) – A nonprofit public-interest litigation firm filed a lawsuit Monday alleging President Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs require congressional approval. 

The Liberty Justice Center, based in Texas, challenged the administration’s reciprocal tariffs, which Trump announced on April 2 and suspended on April 9, hours after they went into effect.

The Liberty Justice Center filing argues that the administration has no authority to issue across-the-board worldwide tariffs without congressional approval. The nonprofits lawsuit alleges Trump has broadly overstepped his authority by claiming “the authority to unilaterally levy tariffs on goods imported from any and every country in the world, at any rate, calculated via any methodology – or mere caprice – immediately, with no notice, or public comment, or phase-in, or delay in implementation, despite massive economic impacts that are likely to do severe damage to the global economy.”

The suit alleges that the statute Trump has used to justify the tariffs, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, doesn’t give Trump the authority he thinks it does. 

“His claimed emergency is a figment of his own imagination: trade deficits, which have persisted for decades without causing economic harm, are not an emergency,” according to the lawsuit. “Nor do these trade deficits constitute an ‘unusual and extraordinary threat.'”

The suit asks the U.S. Court of International Trade to “declare the President’s unprecedented power grab illegal, enjoin the operation of the executive actions that purport to impose these tariffs under the IEEPA, and reaffirm this country’s core founding principle: there shall be no taxation without representation.”

Liberty Justice Center filed the case on behalf of New York-based wine and spirit importers VOS Selections; Pennsylvania-based freshwater fishing supplier FishUSA; Utah-based plumbing and irrigation suppliers Genova Pipe; Virginia-based toy designer MicroKits LLC; and Vermont-based women’s bicycling company Terry Precision Cycling.

All five companies import products from other countries affected by the tariffs, including the 10% baseline tariffs.

The suit argues Trump’s tariffs were over broad and disregarded existing trade agreements.

“These tariffs even applied to places with no civilian population or international trade activity, such as the British Indian Ocean Territory, whose only human inhabitants belong to a joint American and British military base on the island of Diego Garcia, and the Heard and McDonald Islands, which are inhabited only by penguins and seals,” Liberty Justice Center attorneys noted in the court filing. 

Liberty Justice Center said that Trump’s so-called “reciprocal” tariffs were crude calculations: “The chosen formula is not an accepted methodology for calculating trade barriers and has no basis in economic theory.”

The Liberty Justice Center action also takes issues with the idea that trade deficits are bad. Trump has repeatedly said that U.S. trade deficits are the result of trading partners ripping off the U.S. for decades. 

“Nor are trade deficits an emergency or even necessarily a problem; they simply mean that some other country sells lots of things Americans want to buy, or that its people are unwilling or unable (often because of poverty) to purchase many American goods,” according to the lawsuit.

Trump has made audacious promises about his tariffs on the campaign trail and since inauguration. He has said tariffs will make the U.S. “rich as hell,” bring back manufacturing jobs lost to lower-wage countries in decades past and shift the tax burden away from U.S. families.

A tariff is a tax on imported goods. The importer pays the tax and can either absorb the loss or pass the tax on to consumers in the form of higher prices.

In his “Liberation Day” speech, Trump said foreign nations for decades have stolen American jobs, factories and industries. He said the tariffs would bring in new jobs, factories and industries and return the U.S. to a manufacturing superpower.

“Our country and its taxpayers have been ripped off for more than 50 years,” Trump said. “But it is not going to happen anymore.”

Some nations, including China, have responded with retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods. Others have signaled they are eager to make a deal with the Trump administration. Trump has not yet announced any trade deals. Trump paused the higher tariffs for 90 days, giving his administration limited time to make deals with 75 nations the White House reported reached out seeking trade negotiations.

(The Center Square) – American universities have long been captured by systems of thought that are “anti-family, anti-religious, anti-capitalist” and even “anti-truth,” according to Trump-appointed education department official Jonathan Pidluzny.

But Pidluzny and others say there’s a pathway to reversing that trend. 

At a panel discussion hosted by conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation, four Christian college presidents weighed in on how they think universities can “reclaim the culture of American higher education.”

Wyoming Catholic College President Kyle Washut said that widespread resets have happened before, referring to the late 1800s and early 1900s as a time of a “radical remaking” of American higher education. Gilded Age magnates, among others, founded many new colleges that have gained a reputation as some of the best in the country, like Stanford and Vanderbilt universities.

“Generous benefactors came in and started a new wave of institutions. The University of Chicago emerges out of this. A number of these schools come out as a response to saying the old model didn’t work; we’re gonna build new colleges,” Washut said.

These schools marked a departure from their predecessors in that they were private, secular, research-focused universities aiming to prepare students for a career in an industrialized economy.

“As a result of the building of the new colleges, it actually transformed the existing legacy institutions,” Washut said. “So at least in part, it seems to me, the American approach to helping reform higher education begins with creating compelling small institutions to put pressure on the other ones.”

While Washut may not agree with the “utterly pragmatic view of education” that drove much of the change at the time, he thinks history proves that the culture of American higher education can be reclaimed.

Wyoming Catholic College was founded only 20 years ago. The four-year university sits at an elevation of over 5,000 feet in a rural mountain town of less than 8,000 people with only 179 students and a unique curriculum and culture.

It embraces the liberal arts, as all four colleges do that were a part of the panel, but it offers no majors or minors. Just a Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts, to develop well-rounded students steeped in the Great Books and the outdoors. Freshmen kick off their college experience with a three-week backpacking trip to develop grit and physical strength. All students commit to another seven weeks of outdoor formation and one semester of horsemanship.

The college does this in part because it considers Plato’s Republic one of its “foundational texts,” according to Washut, and in the work, Plato advocates for soundness of both mind and body. 

“Socrates asks the question, ‘What do we need to do to educate the guardians,’ the people who are going to preserve and defend the republic, the city, the values of the culture we have?” said Washut. 

The Republic includes among the precursors to rigorous intellectual development distancing oneself from distractions and physical fitness. That’s why students don’t have access to the internet in their dorms and why they “fast” from their cell phones at WCC.

“[This] allows for the focus on intense reading, intense reflection, intense community formation where they’re doing the kind of education and the liberal arts that we think is necessary for leading,” Washut said. 

In addition to a compelling model of education and student life, schools need a compelling financial model if they want to attract more students and gain broader influence.

Grand Canyon University, the largest Christian college in the U.S., hasn’t raised tuition for over 15 years, which its president says is largely because the school’s leadership has been creative in its delivery of education.

“What we thought was, if we would understand the needs of students across the life spectrum, and we were very creative in how we would deliver according to who the student was and what was the nature of what they needed to learn, we could build growing student bodies across the age spectrum leveraging a common infrastructure and we could make it affordable,” said GCU President Brian Mueller.

The school has a traditional campus for younger students, as well as robust online programming. It also has smaller campuses across the country for degrees that can’t be delivered entirely online and a trades program.

The university’s affordability is a central part of its growth and has attracted a diverse student population, according to Mueller. Despite a lack of affirmative action and diversity, equity and inclusion programs (though they do have an Equity Office) the student body is 23% hispanic and 15% African American, with over 40% being students of color, according to the most recent statistics from U.S. News & World Report. 

“It’s not a government mandate through DEI that’ll fix the problem” of attracting minority populations or balancing the male-female ratio, Mueller said. “It’s smart business models that make things affordable, and all of a sudden, you have what the world wants to see – an inclusion of everybody.”

GCU does take government funding, while Virginia’s Christendom College and WCC do not. 

At the College of the Ozarks, the fourth school on the panel, students are required to work 15 hours per week during the school year and two 40-hour work weeks during breaks. Combined with several other factors, this enables students to graduate debt-free.

“We have to figure out a way to scale it and make it affordable, and if that happens, what’s going to happen in the next ten years is really going to shock people,” Mueller said.

(The Center Square) – Gov. Glenn Youngkin vetoed multiple clean energy bills this session, as a new report ranked Virginia 23rd in the nation for energy affordability thanks to its diverse power mix.

A new report from the American Legislative Exchange Council credits Virginia’s relatively low electricity prices to its heavy reliance on natural gas and nuclear power, which together supply nearly 90% of the commonwealth’s energy.

The report shows that 56% of Virginia’s electricity comes from natural gas, followed by 32% from nuclear power and just 5% from solar and other renewables.

Despite that mix, lawmakers passed a slate of clean energy bills this session to expand solar access, improve energy planning and support low-income households. “Virginia’s energy policy framework includes a hat-trick of a Renewable Portfolio Standard, Cap-and-Trade policy, and a net metering policy,” the report states. “Despite these policies that encourage the adoption of solar energy by making it more economically viable for consumers, solar energy remains at only 5% of total electricity contribution.”

One of the vetoed proposals was House Bill 1935, which would have created a task force to improve access to energy efficiency upgrades and weatherization services for low-income households.

House Bill 2413 would have expanded Virginia’s utility planning process by requiring more public input, longer-term forecasting and clean energy considerations. Youngkin vetoed it, arguing the State Corporation Commission already has authority over those plans.

Senate Bill 823 also would have required utilities like Dominion Energy and Appalachian Power to submit detailed workforce development plans when building renewable energy facilities, “giving priority to the hiring, apprenticeship, and training of local workers, workers from historically economically disadvantaged communities, and veterans.”

House Bill 1616 would have created a workforce development program to support offshore wind jobs in Hampton Roads, but the governor rejected it, saying the bill duplicated existing efforts.

House Bill 2537, which would raise Virginia’s energy storage targets and require the development of local model ordinances, remains under review after lawmakers rejected the governor’s proposed substitute. He now has until May 2 to take final action.

House Bill 1883, which updates renewable portfolio standard rules for Dominion Energy and clarifies what qualifies as solar energy under state law, is also awaiting final action after lawmakers rejected the governor’s proposed changes. He has until May 2 to approve, veto, or amend the bill again.

At the same time, Dominion Energy is seeking approval to build a $4.5 billion natural gas plant in Chesterfield County, drawing criticism that it could lock Virginians into decades of higher energy costs.