News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
Ballots counted from dead voters has some saying NC is to blame
Live and let live? A decision by NC counties to accept dead voters’ ballots upsets some, unites others.
Everette Harris voted by mail in the May 2014 primary election. But before Election Day came, he died, and his vote was removed from the count. A decade later, three people — Wilfred Shea, 96, Michael Talbot, 78, and Daniela Smith-Davis, 18 — cast their ballots in the 2024 general election. They also died before Election Day.
But this time, their votes were counted by county board of election members in defiance of state guidance.
It’s the latest affront in a long series of disagreements over election law in North Carolina. Does state law allow the ballots of dead voters to count if they were alive when they cast them?
Call to action
In 2014, this question spurred U.S. Rep. Mark Harris, Everette’s son, to action. Harris asked then N.C. House Speaker Thom Tillis to do something that would ensure future voters in his father’s position would have their ballots counted.
Tillis obliged, sponsoring a bill which would have clarified that a voter’s ballot could not be challenged if they died between casting it and Election Day. The bill, called the Everette Harris Act, sailed through the state House unanimously.
But the state Senate never assigned the bill to a committee, potentially due to an unrelated budgetary fight between Tillis and Senate leader Phil Berger, according to Gerry Cohen, a Wake County board of elections member who helped draft the bill.
“In budget fights, people trade things — ‘we’ll do this, if you’ll do that,’” Cohen said. “I think that Berger wanted something from the House and in return would pass the bill, and it didn’t pass.”
A decade later, Cohen is once again squarely in the center of the latest controversy over deceased voters. Cohen is one of several county board of elections members who ignored State Board of Elections guidance to remove dead voters from the count in the 2024 general election.
Based on its interpretation of North Carolina law, the state elections board issued a 2022 memo instructing county election boards to judge voter qualifications as of Election Day, not the day when that person cast a ballot. By this logic, a voter who died by Election Day would not meet the state’s voter residency requirements.
But Cohen doesn’t agree with that interpretation. And neither do some election board members in Wake and Rowan counties.
Others, including several state residents who filed complaints over the issue, assert that county election boards don’t have authority to make their own interpretations.
“The danger is that board of elections members decided to pick and choose what law they want to follow,” said Michael Frazier, the GOP election integrity chair for Rowan County.
Deceased ballots and their gray area
Each week, the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services provides the state elections board a list of dead people.
The board uses that information to remove the deceased from the voter rolls in accordance with state law. That process doesn’t stop during election cycles.
The confusion for some is that North Carolina law isn’t explicitly clear on whether a voter can be removed from the rolls after casting a ballot because they’ve died.
Ten states, including Florida and Maryland, allow dead voters’ ballots to count if they were alive when they cast them, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Nine states, including Delaware and Iowa, require them to be removed from the count.
In three states (Colorado, Kansas, New York) there’s no blanket ban but challenges over dead voters are allowed.
And in 26 states, including North Carolina, the issue exists in a legal gray area.
“It’s not so much that I see vagueness. I just don’t see where it says if you die before Election Day and you’ve already voted, then your vote doesn’t count,” said Greg Flynn, a Wake County board of elections member.
A ‘nightmare’
In the past, there may have been a concern about people using a dead person’s identity to vote, Flynn continued. But now, technology and voting laws have progressed to the point where elections officials know exactly who is voting. The original impetus for such a law is gone, he added.
In the absence of a clear legislative mandate, Flynn said the State Board of Elections has tried to manage the situation.
“I think what’s happening is that a series of logical decisions has created a process that’s kind of a nightmare for the surviving families,” he said.
When elections staff challenge the ballot of a person who died after voting, a hearing is scheduled. There, voters who have been mistakenly identified as deceased can testify to have their ballots counted.
During this past election, however, relatives of Shea, Talbot and Smith-Davis showed up at the Wake County Board of Elections instead.
One of the family members representing Shea, who was an N.C. State track coach in the 1970s, sobbed for several minutes at the podium before she was able to testify, Cohen recalled.
“The testimony was, ‘I got this challenge letter in the mail last night, and I saw the hearing was today, and I came in. My father was 96 years old. It was the last thing he wanted to do in life,’” Cohen recalled. “And she stood on the stand crying, and I thought this process was unspeakably cruel.”
Down for the count
When it came time to vote on whether to throw out their votes, Cohen, Flynn and Wake County Board of Elections member Erica Porter decided not to sustain the challenges against the relatives. They also removed all other challenged dead voters from the count.
Further west, a similar situation occurred in Rowan County. Faced with a choice on whether to count the ballots of 13 residents who died after making their decision, four members of the Rowan County Board of Elections opted not to vote on the matter, effectively dismissing the challenges.
Frazier filed a complaint against the board members, asking the state elections board to consider their removal from office. To Frazier, it didn’t matter whether the challenged votes were Republican or Democrat. It was their decision to “subvert the law knowingly.”
The state election board decided that the Wake and Rowan election board members could remain in their posts. But they all agreed that the county boards should not have acted in such a manner.
“For me, it is disturbing when our memos are not adhered to,” State Board member Jeff Carmon said. “In two of these situations, I find that the lack of clarity from our legislature gives them an out. It is my hope that the legislature will make it crystal clear to give our memos even more weight.”
Republican State Board members Kevin Lewis and Stacy “Four” Eggers voted in the minority. Eggers said it’s been “quite clear for several decades” that the procedure is to not count these voters’ ballots.
Lewis said that the State Board is the final arbiter of North Carolina law, not the county boards.
“As a county board member, I had to follow a lot of numbered memos that I would have perhaps drafted differently or have had a different interpretation of, but as a county board member, I felt that and understood that I was obligated to comply,” he said.
Will the legislature act on dead ballots?
There seems to be not much of a legislative appetite to clarify the issue.
It’s one of the few election debates that may not fall along ideological or partisan lines, Western Carolina University political science professor Chris Cooper said, so it’s unclear how the legislature would change the law if it chose to do so.
“Who wants to come out and say you want to deny grandma the right to vote after she’s died?” Cooper asked. “It’s a very small number of people we’re talking about, and it’s a sensitive topic, so I don’t think there’s a lot of incentive to make it a policy issue right now.”
As for Cohen, he’s made his point. If the situation arose again, he would follow the State Board’s guidance.
“Did I step out of line? Maybe so. But the situation was so cruel, I decided I need to take a stand to change things,” he said. “I don’t need to stick my neck out again.”
This article first appeared on Carolina Public Press and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
19-year-old killed in Clayton Blvd crash; driver faces DWI charges
SUMMARY: A tragic crash on Clayton Boulevard resulted in the death of a 19-year-old, with driver Jay Guadalupe Moreno Neas, 48, facing DWI charges. Police report that Neas had a blood alcohol content of .17, over twice the legal limit. He ran a stoplight, striking the victim’s car. Charged with felony death by motor vehicle, DWI, and other offenses, Neas’s actions serve as a reminder of the dangers of drunk driving, which accounts for a significant number of traffic fatalities. In response, North Carolina has introduced House Bill 400, aiming to impose stricter penalties on impaired drivers. Neas is scheduled to return to court on April 3rd.

A 48-year-old man was charged with driving with no license and DWI in a “completely preventable” deadly crash.
Story: https://abc11.com/post/clayton-boulevard-at-town-centre-boulevard-reopens-after-crash-driver-arrested/16020831/
Watch: https://abc11.com/watch/live/11065013/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ABC11/
X: https://twitter.com/ABC11_WTVD
TIKTOK: https://www.tiktok.com/@abc11_eyewitnessnews
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
Catering By Design owner shares inspiring story
SUMMARY: Philip Lynn, owner of Catering By Design, has achieved remarkable success, winning the Voter’s Choice Awards for Best Caterer, Employer of the Year, and Best Sweet Tea. With nearly 25 years in business, Lynn’s journey began in his family’s Chinese restaurant. After obtaining a master’s in math and computer science, he worked in corporate roles before transitioning to catering to support his father after his mother’s passing. Emphasizing employee retention through creative freedom and team building, Catering By Design thrives on consistency and strong customer connections. The restaurant’s offerings include dishes like short ribs, rolls, chicken salad croissants, and cheesecake.

Phillip Lin, the owner of Catering By Design, won Boss of the Year, while his business took home Employer of the Year, Caterer of the Year and Best Sweet Tea.
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
Chuck Edwards made these claims at Thursday’s town hall. Asheville Watchdog checked them out. • Asheville Watchdog
Rep. Chuck Edwards made it less than a minute into his opening remarks Thursday night, at his first town hall since being re-elected last November, before the crowd drowned him out for the first time.
In that case, it was applause: As the Republican representing North Carolina’s 11th District referenced his colleagues’ recent reluctance to engage with their constituents, the 300 or so attendees packing A-B Tech’s Ferguson Auditorium made it clear they were happy to have him there.
But it was one of only a few cheers Edwards would get all night. A constituency angry over federal layoffs, international relations, and President Donald Trump’s trade war unleashed its frustration. Tidal waves of jeers were punctuated by individual entreaties for Edwards to hear them out, to criticize Trump or his right-hand billionaire Elon Musk, or to offer a word of compassion. (“Are you a human being?” one attendee yelled.)

Whenever one of the law enforcement officers lining the room opened an exterior door, the crowd gathered outside — a combination of those who planned to protest the event and those who couldn’t get in — unleashed a torrent of boos.
Edwards was visibly irritated at times, smirking at outbursts from the audience and chiding them for talking over him. But he stuck to the plan, facing the audience for about 90 minutes, including an hour of question-and-answer. He touted the work of Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency and the House’s Republican-led budget resolution. He dodged questions on Ukrainian refugees and whether he’d support raising or eliminating the maximum taxable income for Social Security.
Occasionally he broke with party leadership. He said he didn’t support the ideas, repeatedly floated by Trump, to annex Canada and Greenland. And he reminded the crowd that he was there against the advice of the National Republican Congressional Committee — “in spite of my colleagues in D.C. saying, ‘Chuck, you’re an idiot.’”
Asheville Watchdog looked deeper into some of the claims Edwards made Thursday. Here’s what we found:
Claim: Edwards disputed the premise of an audience member’s question about Trump’s lack of support for Ukraine.
“I believe the president is very supportive of Ukraine,” Edwards said. “I believe the president recognizes that (Russian President Vladimir) Putin is a murderous dictator. … I know that Vice President J.D. Vance suggested that if Putin not come to the table for a peace treaty, that he may be facing American soldiers.”
Context: In the two months since his inauguration, Trump has accused Ukraine of instigating its war with Russia and called the country’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, a dictator, false claims that echo Putin talking points.
A televised Oval Office meeting late last month exposed the rift between the American and Ukrainian administrations, as Trump and Vance berated Zelensky and threatened to abandon Ukraine. Zelensky was asked to leave the White House, and in the following days, CNN reported, Trump ordered a pause on military aid to Ukraine.

Putin and Trump have historically spoken of each other in admiring terms, though Trump has at times been critical of Russia’s role in the war with Ukraine. Vance did seem to threaten military action against Russia last month, saying the U.S. could use “military tools of leverage” if Putin refuses to agree to a peace deal. On Friday morning, Putin pushed off a proposal for a month-long ceasefire, saying he would need to set several conditions to move forward.
Claim: Asked about canceled and postponed meetings at the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention concerning vaccines, Edwards said he was “not aware of any meetings that were canceled.”
Context: Last month, the CDC abruptly postponed an advisory committee meeting on immunizations without setting a new date. New Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr, who has been a vocal vaccine skeptic for decades, has been a critic of the committee.
A few days later, the FDA canceled an advisory committee meeting on selecting the strains to be used in next season’s flu shot. The FDA issued its recommendations for flu shot composition this week without the independent input. Experts have said the cancellations raise serious concerns about transparency and scientific validity at agencies under Kennedy.
Claim: Edwards said there “have been no cuts to the staff of the VA.” As the audience booed — with some yelling out that Edwards was lying — he attributed the perception of cuts at the Department of Veterans Affairs to a “leaked memo looking at the efficiency of the VA.”
Context: There have been staff cuts at the VA under Trump: Last month, the department announced it had laid off more than 2,400 probationary employees in “non-mission critical positions” across two rounds of dismissals. Earlier this week, federal judges in two separate cases ordered the administration to temporarily reinstate employees who lost jobs in mass firings at the VA and other federal agencies.
Earlier this month, the Associated Press reported that an internal memo circulating at the VA called for a reorganization that would eliminate more than 80,000 jobs.

Claim: Edwards repeatedly rebuffed assertions that the House Republican budget plan calls for or would result in cuts to Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare.
“There’s nothing in that resolution that mentions the word Medicare, Medicaid or Social Security,” Edwards said. “There’s no intent from President Trump, nor from the current Congress, to do anything to disrupt payments for Medicare or Social Security.”
Context: Edwards was repeating what has become a common talking point for House Republicans this month: that their budget resolution contains no mention of cutting those programs. That’s true.
But the Congressional Budget Office (which Edwards roundly denounced Thursday) has said it would be impossible to impose the proposed cuts — $880 billion to programs under the Energy and Commerce Committee over the next decade — without digging into Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program. Republicans have explicitly ruled out cuts to Medicare, implicitly putting a larger target on Medicaid. Health policy experts have backed the CBO’s statement.
Musk, repeating debunked claims about tens of billions of dollars in waste and improper payments to dead people, has reiterated his plans to target Social Security benefits for cuts as recently as this week.

Claim: Asked about Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, Edwards responded with a prewritten list of cuts by the agency that he said he supported — and he labored through it, reading, sometimes inaudibly, as the audience voiced its displeasure.
Context: Edwards described several cuts in language that directly matches posts from DOGE’s X account. But some of them appear to lack context.
His mention of “a $532,000 grant that was awarded by (the National Institutes of Health) to use a mouse model to investigate the effects of cross-sex testosterone treatment” echoes language publicized by DOGE, but as Snopes.com reported, a grant matching that amount and description appears to have already been paid out in 2023, rather than being an ongoing cost.
Similarly, a “$1.7 million grant awarded by NIH for the China Health and Retirement longitudinal study at Peking University in Beijing” seems to refer to a long-term international survey, meant to collect data for studies on population aging, that the NIH has been funding almost every year since 2010, including during Trump’s first term. According to NIH records, it received a $1.7 million grant last year.
And Edwards repeated a claim that DOGE identified $300 million in Small Business Administration loans to borrowers older than 115 years in 2020 and 2021. But that claim appears to be tied to Musk’s assertions that tens of millions of dead people are receiving Social Security benefits. Those claims have been debunked and stem from confusion around a programming language used in Social Security’s record-keeping system, which sometimes defaults to erroneous dates for entries with missing or incomplete birthdates.
Claim: In response to a question on the Trump administration holding up funding that Congress had already approved, Edwards said this: “There is nothing in the Constitution that says every dollar that Congress sends the administration has to be spent.”
Context: The question of who has the power of purse has dominated Trump’s return to office. He has suspended trillions in federal spending and essentially shut down the United States Agency for International Development.
Article 1 of the Constitution decrees that Congress passes laws to spend or appropriate money. But there have been many battles about the powers of the legislative and executive branches over the years. During President Richard Nixon’s second term, his refusal to spend money on projects he didn’t like led to Congress passing the Impoundment Control Act in 1974 to prevent presidents from overriding Congress on appropriations.
Trump and Office of Management and Budget chief Russell Vought say the act is unconstitutional, a stance many scholars disagree with. Georgetown law professor Stephen Vladeck told NPR there is no good-faith argument to support Trump and Vought’s view. But he also noted that while the Impoundment Control Act generally prohibits presidents from halting funds, it does allow the president to tell Congress in some cases that he doesn’t want to spend appropriations. In those cases, under the law, Congress is to decide whether it wants to let the president impound the money.
In a 5-4 ruling earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the administration’s request to block a lower court order to restart $2 billion in payments to USAID for work that has been already completed. It’s likely the high court will be weighing in on additional cases surrounding the constitutionality of Trump’s freezing of funds.
Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. Jack Evans is an investigative reporter who previously worked at the Tampa Bay Times. You can reach him via email at jevans@avlwatchdog.org. Keith Campbell is The Watchdog’s managing editor. You can reach him via email at kcampbell@avlwatchdog.org. The Watchdog’s local reporting during this crisis is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.
Related
The post Chuck Edwards made these claims at Thursday’s town hall. Asheville Watchdog checked them out. • Asheville Watchdog appeared first on avlwatchdog.org
-
Mississippi Today6 days ago
Mississippians honor first Black lawmaker since Reconstruction
-
News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed4 days ago
Long Story Short: Bill to Boost Rural Mental Health and Diversion Programs Advances
-
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed6 days ago
Lumbee tribe may finally receive long-sought federal recognition
-
News from the South - Florida News Feed6 days ago
Heavy rain, gusty winds expected in Central Florida
-
News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed4 days ago
Blood stain leads to 2 arrests in 1997 Oklahoma cold case
-
News from the South - Missouri News Feed6 days ago
St. Louis forecast: Temperatures warm up this week
-
News from the South - Alabama News Feed7 days ago
Faith Time: Leaving a church and reasons to stay Part I
-
News from the South - Georgia News Feed6 days ago
Georgia teen fights for his life after gas station shooting | FOX 5 News