Connect with us

News from the South - Arkansas News Feed

Arkansas secretary of state touts election security, calls for changes to ballot initiative process

Published

on

arkansasadvocate.com – Tess Vrbin – 2025-02-17 15:46:00


Arkansas secretary of state touts election security, calls for changes to ballot initiative process

by Tess Vrbin, Arkansas Advocate
February 17, 2025

Arkansas Secretary of State Cole Jester on Monday declared Arkansas has “the most secure elections in the country” but cast doubt on the security of absentee voting and the integrity of citizen-led ballot initiatives.

Jester, who took office Jan. 2, called for a “top-to-bottom security review” of Arkansas’ election procedures on Jan. 24 and presented his findings at a press conference Monday. The report his office released Monday labeled four of its seven focus areas — in-person voting, county outreach, cybersecurity and physical security — with an “A” grade. The report labeled voter registration “B+” and absentee voting “B-.”

The initiative petition process received the lowest grade with a “D,” and Jester said the review found “thousands of fraudulent signatures” on petitions for ballot measures.

He and his deputy secretary and chief legal counsel, Nathan Lee, expressed support for several bills moving through the Legislature that would add more regulations to the initiative process.

“Right now there’s little to disincentivize someone from maybe misrepresenting what might be on the initiative petition when trying to collect signatures,” Lee said.

Sen. Kim Hammer, R-Benton, is sponsoring three bills that a House committee will consider Monday afternoon:

Senate Bill 207 would require canvassers to disclose that petition fraud is a Class A misdemeanor, which is punishable by up to 1 year in prison.Senate Bill 208 would require canvassers to request a photo ID from potential signers.Senate Bill 211 would require canvassers to file an affidavit with the secretary of state certifying they complied with the Arkansas Constitution and state laws related to canvassing, perjury, forgery and fraudulent practices in the procurement of petition signatures. Signatures submitted without the affidavit would not be counted.

All three bills passed the Senate Wednesday, as did their emergency clauses, which would allow them to go into effect immediately upon Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders’ signature.

Two more bills sponsored by Hammer passed the Senate, though their emergency clauses did not. Senate Bill 209 would disqualify signatures collected by canvassers if the secretary of state finds “by a preponderance of evidence” that they violated state law collecting the signatures. Senate Bill 210 would require potential signers to read the ballot title of a petition or have it read aloud to them in the presence of a canvasser. It would also make it a misdemeanor for a canvasser to accept a signature from people who have not read the ballot title or had it read aloud to them in the presence of a canvasser.

Under Article 5 Section 1 of the state Constitution, Arkansans can propose laws and constitutional amendments or repeal state laws through the initiative and referendum process, which requires citizens to collect a certain number of signatures that must be certified by state officials before being placed on the ballot for a vote.

Arkansas’ elections are overseen by the secretary of state, a position Hammer is seeking in 2026. Jester’s predecessor, John Thurston, was elected treasurer in November, and Jester’s appointment by Sanders means he cannot run for secretary of state.

Hammer’s five bills passed a divided Senate committee Tuesday. Opponents of the bills called them an attack on direct democracy. Supporters alleged fraud and misconduct by canvassers collecting signatures last year for a proposed constitutional amendment that would have created a limited right to abortion.

The Arkansas Abortion Amendment was one of several proposed measures in 2024 that failed to qualify for the ballot due to paperwork issues, insufficient signatures and legal challenges.

Deputy Secretary of State Nathan Lee (left) helps Secretary Cole Jester (third from right) present a report on election security during a press conference on Monday, February 17, 2025. Also pictured are Director of Elections Leslie Bellamy (second from right) and Assistant Director of Elections Josh Bridges (right). (Tess Vrbin/Arkansas Advocate)

Lee said the secretary of state’s office is “very reactive” and does not have “any tools currently to be proactive in combating fraud in the petition process.”

The existing law making petition fraud a misdemeanor specifies that a person must “knowingly” commit fraud, such as signing a petition more than once, in order for the action to be a crime.

When asked how to prove a person’s intent, Jester said this is “a criminal law question.”

“If you did it 15 times, there’s probably evidence that’s on purpose. If you do it twice and there’s no other evidence, that would not show intent,” he said.

Other findings

Legislative Democrats are sponsoring a bill that would create no-excuse absentee voting in Arkansas. The bill has not yet been heard in committee.

Mail-in absentee ballots account for less than 1% of all Arkansas ballots, Jester said, but it comes with “inherent risk.” He said his office “will oppose any effort to expand mail-in voting” and support in-person voting early or on Election Day.

Unlike in-person voting, absentee voting does not come with the guarantees that voters were not coerced into voting a certain way and that “no one else’s hands are on the ballots” before election officials receive them, Jester said.

He also said Arkansas’ rejection rate of absentee ballots is “a really good thing because that means our clerks are doing their jobs seriously and thoroughly.”

Regarding voter registration, Jester said state and local election officials work hard to ensure their records of eligible voters are accurate, such as removing deceased Arkansans from voter rolls.

Lee said the secretary of state’s office seeks to work with federal authorities to ensure that only United States citizens vote in Arkansas elections. It is illegal on the federal level for noncitizens to vote, but the issue became a talking point in the Republican-led U.S. House of Representatives last year in the run-up to Election Day.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

SUBSCRIBE

Arkansas ranks last in the nation for voter participation, according to a study from the National Conference on Citizenship. Arkansas is also one of seven states that do not allow electronic voter registration, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. A Democrat-led bill would institute this policy but has not yet been heard in committee.

In 2024, lawmakers approved an emergency rule drafted by the Arkansas Board of Election Commissioners that requires a “wet signature,” meaning signing with a pen, on voter registration applications except at certain state agencies.

“Though online voter registration would be more convenient for many Arkansans, grave concerns exist regarding the accuracy of online registrations,” Jester’s report states. “…Accurate wet signatures are not currently possible in an online system. Additionally, such a system would require the cooperation of several government agencies with very different levels of security and software, and thus such a system is not currently feasible.”

A federal judge blocked the emergency rule in August in response to a challenge from voter participation advocates, but in September, the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued an administrative stay that allowed state officials to implement the rule while parties in the lawsuit prepared court filings.

North Arkansas voters distrustful of voting machines, poll workers

Jester’s report states that electronic voting machines are not connected to the internet and therefore are not subject to election interference via cyberattacks. Searcy and Independence counties do not use voting machines and instead use hand-counted paper ballots.

When state election officials saw discrepancies in Searcy County’s 2024 primary election results after an audit, county officials defended the use of paper ballots and promised to learn from the errors.

Local and state officials have repeatedly vouched for the security of voting machines, while local voters have expressed distrust in the election system, whether it be conducted through a paper ballot system or an electronic one.

Arkansas Advocate is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Arkansas Advocate maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Sonny Albarado for questions: info@arkansasadvocate.com.

The post Arkansas secretary of state touts election security, calls for changes to ballot initiative process appeared first on arkansasadvocate.com

News from the South - Arkansas News Feed

Federal judge declares Arkansas social media age-verification law unconstitutional

Published

on

arkansasadvocate.com – Sonny Albarado – 2025-04-01 18:33:00

by Sonny Albarado, Arkansas Advocate
April 1, 2025

A federal judge declared an Arkansas law requiring age verification to create new social media accounts unconstitutional late Monday and permanently blocked the law.

The law, Act 689 of 2023, was the first of its kind in the nation and was a priority of Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders in her first year in office. It required social media platforms to verify the age of all account holders in Arkansas. Those under 18 could only access sites with parental permission.

U.S. District Judge Timothy L. Brooks of the Western District of Arkansas said in Monday’s ruling that Act 689 “would violate the First Amendment rights of Arkansans” because it is a “content-based restriction on speech that is not narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest.” The law also would violate the due process rights of the plaintiffs, the judge wrote.

The ruling marked the first permanent injunction that NetChoice, the nonprofit trade association for large tech companies that brought the suit, has obtained against similar laws it has challenged as violating free speech and enterprise online, according to a press release. 

NetChoice filed its lawsuit against the state in June 2023, and Brooks issued a preliminary injunction that August, about two weeks before the law was set to take effect on Sept. 1.   

The court’s ruling confirms NetChoice’s argument that restricting access to protected speech violates the First Amendment, the group’s litigation director, Chris Marchese, said in a statement. 

“This ruling protects Americans from having to hand over their IDs or biometric data just to access constitutionally protected speech online,” Marchese said. “It reaffirms that parents — not politicians or bureaucrats — should decide what’s appropriate for their children.”

Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin said in a statement Tuesday that he respects the court’s decision, adding that his office is evaluating its options.

Sanders called for lawmakers to amend Act 689 during her January State of the State address “so that it’s no longer held up in court and can begin to be enforced.” 

To date, no such amendments to the law have been proposed, but Sen. Bart Hester, R-Cave Springs, told the Advocate last week he expects it to “happen one way or another” since the governor said it’s important to her. 

Brooks’ 41-page opinion on Monday granted NetChoice’s motion for summary judgment and declared that “NetChoice members and their users will suffer irreparable harm” if Act 689 takes effect because it “abridges the First Amendment rights of Arkansans who use social media and contains terms too vague to be reasonably understood.”

“The Court does not doubt the reality, well supported by the record, that unfettered social media access can and does harm minors,” Brooks wrote, adding that the state does have a compelling interest in protecting minors.

“The state does not, however, have ‘a free-floating power to restrict the ideas to which children may be exposed,’” he said, quoting from another court’s opinion.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

SUBSCRIBE

The law is “maximally burdensome” on both the social media platforms and the users it targets, the judge wrote.

“It erects barriers to accessing entire social media platforms rather than placing those barriers around the content or functions that raise concern,” he said. “It not only hinders adults’ ability to speak and receive protected speech online, it excludes minors whose parents do not consent (or cannot prove their consent)” from accessing forums on the internet.

If the Legislature’s intent “was to protect minors from materials or interactions that could harm them online, there is no evidence that the Act will be effective in achieving that goal,” the judge said.

“Rather than targeting content that is harmful to minors, Act 689 simply impedes access to content writ large.”  

The law also “is unclear which NetChoice members are subject to regulation,” forcing some companies “to choose between risking enforcement penalties … and implementing age-verification requirements that burden their users’ First Amendment rights,” Brooks wrote.

NetChoice members whom the Act clearly regulates “would be pressed into service as the private censors of the State,” Brooks noted. “No legal remedy exists to compensate Arkansans for the loss of their First Amendment rights.”

The state argued that the act’s language made it clear that it covers Meta, Twitter (now X) and TikTok, but NetChoice argued that members like Snapchat, Nextdoor and Pinterest couldn’t be certain the law does not apply to them, according to the ruling. The state responded that the law didn’t apply to Snapchat because “it’s ‘different from a traditional social media platform.’” The law also specifically exempted YouTube and Google from having to verify users’ age.

The act is unconstitutionally vague because “it fails to adequately define which entities are subject to its requirements, risking chilling effects and inviting arbitrary enforcement,” according to the ruling.

Brooks concludes by stating “Act 689 is a content-based restriction on speech, and it is not targeted to address the harms the State has identified. Arkansas takes a hatchet to adults’ and minors’ protected speech alike though the Constitution demands it use a scalpel.”

Deputy Editor Antoinette Grajeda contributed to this story.

Your donations help us shine a light on Arkansas government.

SUPPORT

 

 

Arkansas Advocate is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Arkansas Advocate maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Sonny Albarado for questions: info@arkansasadvocate.com.

The post Federal judge declares Arkansas social media age-verification law unconstitutional appeared first on arkansasadvocate.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Arkansas News Feed

Prison appropriation bill fails in Arkansas Senate

Published

on

www.youtube.com – 40/29 News – 2025-04-01 17:24:13

SUMMARY: The Arkansas Senate failed to pass the prison appropriation bill aimed at constructing a 3,000-bed prison in Franklin County. While it received a favorable vote of 19 to 10, it needed a two-thirds majority due to its emergency clause. The funding request increased from $470 million to $750 million, with supporters arguing it would address prison overcrowding and crime reduction. However, opponents criticized the lack of detailed information on the project and logistical considerations for the construction site. Lawmakers emphasized the need for an accountable plan for monitoring the project’s progress.

YouTube video

Prison appropriation bill fails in Arkansas Senate

Subscribe to 40/29 on YouTube now for more: http://bit.ly/PTElbK

Get more Northwest Arkansas news: http://www.4029tv.com
Like us: http://facebook.com/4029news
Follow us: http://twitter.com/4029news
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/4029news/

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - Arkansas News Feed

“We cannot hide anymore” Group protests in Springdale against immigration policies

Published

on

www.youtube.com – 40/29 News – 2025-03-31 17:25:42

SUMMARY: Hundreds of people protested in Springdale, Arkansas, calling for better recognition of immigrants and their contributions to the state. The protest was organized by a group aiming to challenge negative stereotypes of immigrants, particularly undocumented individuals. They argued that immigrants have significantly grown the economy and brought diversity to Arkansas. State Representative Aaron Pilkington acknowledged the value of legal immigrants but expressed concerns about the impact of illegal immigration on state resources. The protest also addressed issues at Tyson, where workers fear retaliation for speaking out. The march began at Murphy Park and ended at Luther George Park.

YouTube video

A group gathered in Springdale on Monday to speak out against immigration

Subscribe to 40/29 on YouTube now for more: http://bit.ly/PTElbK

Get more Northwest Arkansas news: http://www.4029tv.com
Like us: http://facebook.com/4029news
Follow us: http://twitter.com/4029news
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/4029news/

Source

Continue Reading

Trending