Connect with us

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Arden Post Office overwhelmed? Waste Pro trash bins at the Buncombe County Landfill? Could Buncombe GIS give traffic alerts? • Asheville Watchdog

Published

on

avlwatchdog.org – JOHN BOYLE – 2024-12-20 06:00:00

Today’s round of questions, my smart-aleck replies and the real answers:

Question: Over the past 10 days, we’ve been getting notices that U.S. Postal Service packages can’t be delivered due to various reasons like, “driveway was blocked,” and “customer requested hold at post office.” These are just not true. When I went into our post office on Hendersonville Road, the Arden Post Office, I was truly shocked. The line was out the door with customers picking up packages. Everyone had similar stories. The post office employees kept blaming Amazon for too many packages and kept saying they were “swamped.” When I say the post office was unorganized, I mean it. Piles of boxes were everywhere. The staff told the customer in front of me to come back in two to three days because they hadn’t sorted the piles and, “we don’t know where your boxes are.” It truly looked like the Whoville post office after the Grinch did his Grinchy thing. I kid you not! It reached a new level this (past) weekend when a medical shipment for my child was left at the post office because “customer requested it be held.” This is simply a lie. They aren’t even trying to deliver packages. Instead they are making up excuses for why they can’t deliver them. This is inexcusable at best. They are holding up medical supplies from reaching customers. This post office has been troublesome for years and everyone in Arden talks about it. But these undelivered packages are a whole new level of irresponsibility. Is there anything you can do to help?

My answer: I’m happy to have a word with the Grinch over a nice Cold Mountain brew at Highland. Also, count me in for singing, “Fah Who Foraze, Dah Who Doraze” when all the whos gather around the Christmas tree.

Real answer: Postal Service spokesperson Philip Bogenberger provided some answers on this one, but I don’t think my reader is going to be fully satisfied.

“Like many Post Offices this time of year, the Arden Post Office is seeing a heavy rise in mail and package volumes, as well as increased customer traffic into Post Offices,” Bogenberger told me. “Still, the Postal Service remains committed to accepting each mailpiece and making every delivery. We are truly appreciative of our team members who are working diligently and efficiently to ensure customers receive their holiday cards and packages by Dec. 25 in addition to delivering non-holiday mail.”

Hey, I appreciate them, too, but I wondered if this building is just too small or they don’t have enough employees. Bogenberger said the Postal Service leases the building.

“There are no plans to relocate at this time, but the Postal Service continually evaluates facilities to ensure they are suitable for operational needs,” he said. “Regarding staff, there were some employees at that office who relocated following Hurricane Helene. During periods of high volumes, we implement contingency plans such as bringing in employees from nearby offices if possible, calling in substitute carriers and hiring seasonal employees. We are committed to delivering every mailpiece.”

In general, Bogenberger said the Postal Service “is more prepared than ever to deliver for the holidays, even as volumes increase to their highest levels.”

“We are processing mail and packages around the clock and our carriers are delivering earlier in the morning and later in the evening.”

Waste Pro’s contract with Buncombe County ends at the end of the year. The company is collecting its trash bins, but it’s not trashing them at the Buncombe County Landfill, the county says. // Watchdog photo by John Boyle

Question: Is it true that Waste Pro is taking all the old trash cans to the dump?

My answer: I was kind of hoping this was true just because I’m a fan of irony.

Real Answer: Buncombe County’s new trash and recycling contractor, FCC Environmental, has been issuing new trash bins, and Waste Pro, whose contract ends at the end of the month, has been picking up its containers. But it’s not trashing them at the Buncombe County Landfill, said Johanna Cano, a Buncombe County spokesperson.

I had asked about this at Thursday’s Tropical Storm Helene briefing.

“We followed up with our Solid Waste department regarding your question about Waste Pro bins,” Cano told me. “They are temporarily staging them there. They will be hauled out to other markets for reuse. They are not being dumped at the landfill.”

Question: Buncombe County’s website gives the public access to their Graphical Information System (GIS) maps. Why is there no overlay that shows road blockages and construction/repair locations? This would be useful for planning travel, especially in areas like Fairview where a lot of work is being done. Surely, they must have this information in GIS just for their own planning and record keeping. This should have been up there within the first week of the Helene event. Nearly three months later, still nothing.

My answer: If you just assume that all traffic maps around here are bright red with congestion, no matter what app or website you use, that’s a pretty good bet.

Real answer: Buncombe County spokesperson Kassi Day checked in with the county’s GIS team for this one.

“Buncombe County acquires, develops, maintains, and uses GIS data in support of its internal business functions and the public services it provides,” Day said. “Since Buncombe County does not maintain roads, we do not maintain an overlay that shows road construction, blockages, etc.”

Day said they do recommend residents check the NCDOT website for real-time information on road closures, construction and incidents — drivenc.gov.

“Google, Waze, Apple Maps, etc. are the standards for routing, as those services provide directions, traffic information, and closures, etc., updated automatically by their algorithms and user input,” Day added.


Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. Got a question? Send it to John Boyle at jboyle@avlwatchdog.org or 828-337-0941. His Answer Man columns appear each Tuesday and Friday. The Watchdog’s reporting is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.

Original article

The post Arden Post Office overwhelmed? Waste Pro trash bins at the Buncombe County Landfill? Could Buncombe GIS give traffic alerts? • Asheville Watchdog appeared first on avlwatchdog.org

The Watchdog

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

‘Our Wave’ Co-founder on support spaces for sexual assault survivors

Published

on

www.youtube.com – ABC11 – 2025-04-26 10:24:54


SUMMARY: In recognition of Sexual Assault Awareness Month, North Carolina Governor Josh Stein announced a new sexual assault cold case unit to support survivors, with trauma-informed investigators dedicated to solving cases. Co-founder of Rwave, Brendan Michaelelsson, shared how their platform provides safe, anonymous spaces for survivors to share their stories and access resources. Since its launch in 2018, Rwave has helped survivors from 67 countries and all 50 U.S. states. Michaelelsson emphasized the importance of confidential platforms and suggested creating cultures of respect and safety in various environments. Rwave encourages volunteers and allies to get involved through their website.

YouTube video

April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month. ‘Our Wave’ Co-founder and CTO Brendan Michaelsen joined ABC11 to talk building support spaces for survivors and other resources.

Download: https://abc11.com/apps/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ABC11/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abc11_wtvd/
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@abc11_wtvd
TIKTOK: https://www.tiktok.com/@abc11_eyewitnessnews

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Juvenile offenders often denied parole in NC prisons even as adults

Published

on

carolinapublicpress.org – Lucas Thomae – 2025-04-26 00:00:00

A decade after a federal judge ordered North Carolina to adopt a plan to give juvenile offenders serving life sentences a “meaningful opportunity” for parole, a lawsuit making its way through the court system says the state has failed to follow through.

Earlier this month a judge denied the state’s motion to dismiss the suit, which was filed in 2023, noting “concerning” accounts of omitted and false information in plaintiff Brett Abrams’ parole file.

Abrams, 56, is serving a life sentence for murder at the minimum security prison in Hillsborough. He leaves prison five days a week to work a full-time job at a meat packing plant. In his 40 years of incarceration, he’s accrued 11 infractions, the last being in 2005.

On paper, he seems like a great candidate for parole. But the four-person commission that has sole discretion over parole decisions in North Carolina has denied him every time since he first became eligible in 1993.

Abrams has undergone two parole reviews since the state implemented its new process for juvenile offenders — colloquially known as the “Hayden Plan” for the case Hayden v. Keller that spurred its creation. 

However, he continues to be denied his freedom.

A brutal killing

In 1983, Abrams stabbed and killed his 20-year old neighbor at her parents’ home after she confronted him for secretly watching her sunbathe. Abrams was 14 at the time of the slaying, and at 15 he was charged as an adult and sentenced to life imprisonment after pleading guilty to second-degree murder.

Depositions from Abrams’ lawsuit revealed his parole file had omitted crucial information that might have helped with his release. It also contained inaccurate information, including that he had an open homicide case against him for the 1982 death of his brother. In reality, the Iredell County Sheriffs’ Office had ruled the death an accident and closed the case.

“We saw in his profile pretty significant, very material mistakes that included misleading information, lies, things that were simply not true which we believe are so significant that it’s a sort of evidence in itself that the system is broken,” Abrams’ attorney, Jake Sussman, told Carolina Public Press.

And despite Abrams seeking psychological counseling and treatment based on the recommendation of the Parole Commission in 2018, those records were not included in his 2020 review.

“One would assume accurate and comprehensive summaries with relevant information would be essential where commissioners vote on more than 100 cases a day,” Judge Richard Myers wrote in his April 2 ruling.

The court cannot reverse the decisions made by the state’s Parole Commission, meaning the legality of Abrams’ continued incarceration is not being questioned. But Myers determined it is “within this court’s purview to review for Eighth Amendment violations,” as proven in Hayden v. Keller.

“What we’ve asked the judge to do is to find that the current system is unconstitutional as it applies to Mr. Abrams, and therefore as it would apply to all of the juvenile offenders, and develop a plan to actually have a review process that works,” Sussman said.

Juvenile offenders at mercy of the system

Decades of judicial rulings have given states plenty of discretion over how to handle the parole process.

North Carolina’s system has changed several times, and starting in 1994 the state eliminated parole altogether in favor of a different system called “structured sentencing,” which sets a minimum sentence and allows the Parole Commission to set the terms of release for felons once they reach that mark.

Those imprisoned prior to 1994 are still subject to the state’s older system, which Sussman described as a “constitutional mess,” particularly for juvenile offenders.

Two U.S. Supreme Court decisions from the 2010s — Graham v. Florida and Miller v. Alabama — resulted in monumental changes for people serving life sentences due to crimes they committed as juveniles. In those rulings, the Supreme Court severely limited states’ abilities to administer life sentences without parole to juvenile offenders, deciding that such actions constituted “cruel and unusual punishment” under the Eighth Amendment.

The logic behind that ruling is that juvenile offenders are more likely to respond to rehabilitation and reform compared to people imprisoned for crimes they committed later in life.

“Research in the area of brain development shows that the brain is not fully developed until about age 25,” explained Erin Fitzgerald, a professor at Elon University who specializes in juvenile justice. “This lack of development makes juveniles more impulsive, susceptible to peer pressure and unable to fully appreciate the consequences of their actions. However, it also makes them more malleable and capable of rehabilitation.”

Justice for juvenile offenders

The Hayden Plan at the center of Abrams’ lawsuit was born out of the precedent set by the Graham and Miller cases.

In 2010, a North Carolina inmate serving a life sentence for sexual assaults he committed as a teenager in the 1980s sued the Parole Commission for not giving him a fair chance to make his case for release.

His name was Shaun Hayden.

Every year after becoming eligible for parole, Hayden would receive the same letter from the commission saying that he had been denied parole, despite never having interacted with them in any way or being notified that he was up for review.

“He didn’t think that was fair, and he was correct,” said Ben Finholt, who was one of Hayden’s attorneys in his lawsuit against the commission. “It was a sham parole system where (the commission) never talked to anyone. They just review documents every year, and if not much changes, then you just get denied every year without them ever talking to you.”

A District Court ruled in Hayden’s favor, citing the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Graham v. Florida. The state lost its appeal and in 2018 was directed to implement a new plan for handling parole review for juvenile offenders.

That plan guaranteed juvenile offenders a 30-minute video conference with one of the commissioners, a specialized case analyst and, in the case of denial, a letter detailing why the inmate was denied parole and recommendations for future reviews.

New parole plan, old issues

The new plan hasn’t exactly led to substantive changes, however.

Finholt, who now serves as Abrams’ attorney for his parole review (separate from the lawsuit that Sussman is handling), has had a firsthand account of the Hayden Plan’s shortcomings.

“The parole case analyst in Brett’s case admitted under oath that she did not consider the advocacy letter that I wrote for Brett in 2020, that it was not part of the record and that she had made no changes to her process based on the fact that the person being considered for parole was a juvenile,” he said. “That is explicitly contrary to (the Hayden court’s) holding that people who were kids at the time of the crime are entitled constitutionally to a different process.”

That was one of the reasons Myers, the judge in Abrams’ lawsuit, denied the state’s motion to dismiss the suit.

However, Myers also wrote that it is “still unclear” based on the facts of the case whether the commissioners would have changed their decision on Abrams if the information in his file had been completely accurate.

He declined to rule in favor of either party and ordered more discovery on the matter. When that is completed in June, he may issue a final ruling or set a trial date.

Sussman said that if Abrams wins this lawsuit, he would advocate for a decision-making process that is less arbitrary, such as a rubric or points-based system.

Finholt has also advocated for such a change, and he said it makes sense regardless of people’s opinions regarding parole.

“My personal feeling, based on my long professional experience, is that most of the folks who are up for parole would do just fine outside of prison,” he said. “However, even if you’re a person who disagrees with me on that front, you should still dislike the current process because it’s not informed by any evidence or any data.

“If you’re the kind of person who thinks that most folks should stay inside, you should also be horrified by the fact that these release decisions are being made essentially on people’s guts.”

This article first appeared on Carolina Public Press and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The post Arrest of Wisconsin judge ‘escalation’ in Trump-judiciary conflict, Democrats warn appeared first on tennesseelookout.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The content presents a case focused on the rights of juvenile offenders, specifically in relation to parole decisions. The emphasis on rehabilitation, fairness in parole processes, and concerns over the accuracy and fairness of the system reflects a more progressive, or center-left, perspective. It advocates for juvenile offenders’ opportunity for parole based on their potential for reform, which aligns with broader left-leaning views on criminal justice reform and the belief in rehabilitation over punitive measures. The inclusion of legal cases like Graham v. Florida and Miller v. Alabama suggests an alignment with the idea of justice for juvenile offenders in line with constitutional protections. While the tone is not overtly political, the framing of the issues reflects concerns typically associated with progressive criminal justice reform.

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Mental health pros worry about possible cuts to 988 hotline funding

Published

on

www.youtube.com – ABC11 – 2025-04-25 21:36:26


SUMMARY: Mental health professionals express concern over potential cuts to the 988 suicide prevention hotline, particularly for LGBTQ+ youth. A leaked budget draft reveals the Trump administration’s proposal to eliminate funding for specialized services. Since its launch in July 2022, the hotline has answered over 219,000 calls, with rising demand for mental health services noted by professionals like Shawn Thomas. The North Carolina Department of Health emphasizes that federal funding is crucial for timely call responses and effective service delivery. Advocates are alarmed, warning that losing this resource would significantly impact vulnerable populations.

YouTube video

Mental health professionals say the 988 hotline is an invaluable resource, and any cuts would affect the strides being made in the state to meet growing demand.

Story: https://abc11.com/post/mental-health-professionals-worry-possible-cuts-988-suicide-hotline-funding/16248556/
Download: https://abc11.com/apps/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ABC11/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abc11_wtvd/
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@abc11_wtvd
TIKTOK: https://www.tiktok.com/@abc11_eyewitnessnews

Source

Continue Reading

Trending