Connect with us

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

What is UNC Asheville doing on wooded property near Five Points? Taxi ‘shed’ at Asheville Regional Airport? What does ‘titled debris’ actually mean? • Asheville Watchdog

Published

on

avlwatchdog.org – JOHN BOYLE – 2025-01-21 06:30:00

Today’s round of questions, my smart-aleck replies and the real answers:

Question: For years, UNCA has owned land off Dortch Avenue known as the South Campus walking trails that include about one mile of wooded hiking paths. Many residents (especially those of us with four-legged family members) of Five Points and nearby neighborhoods love the woods for the opportunity they provide for connection to nature and dog frolicking (we’re not opposed to cat- or small horse-frolicking, but dogs seem to be the more popular four-legged companion). The woods are a bit of a hidden gem, and they’ve been even more of a refuge with so many dog parks closed after Helene. In the last few weeks, we’ve noticed caution tape, survey stakes, and wetland tape in various places, and a tree removal crew has begun clearing some brush at the entrance. One of the workers informed us that the university is developing the land and plans to construct four buildings; work will apparently start in the spring. There hasn’t been any signage in the woods and we haven’t been able to learn any details from the university. Any chance you can help investigate? We’d love to know if the development rumors are true, if the university is developing or if they’ve sold the land, the timeline, how the project is actually being funded given the university’s financial situation, and what the building and space will be used for.

My answer: Every time I see a cat out for a “frolic” on a leash, it looks like the poor animal is absolutely miserable and would probably take out its owner if it weighed 30 pounds more.

Real answer: UNC-Asheville spokesman Brian Hart said no decisions have been made on the property.

“UNC Asheville is taking steps to better understand the characteristics of 90 acres of undeveloped portions of university property,” Hart said via email. “This includes assessing boundaries, topography, land composition, and utilities. To support this process, the university has authorized an experienced external vendor to conduct a thorough exploratory assessment, which will require removing a minimal number of trees and collecting soil samples.”

Hart said the university is dedicated to working with environmental experts about sustainable and responsible land use.

“In keeping with our commitment to transparency and collaboration, as options are being finalized, UNC Asheville will host listening sessions to share information about potential plans and to gather input from the community,” Hart said.

Hart said “exploring thoughtful and strategic opportunities for land use is part of the university’s efforts to have a positive impact here.”

“Any future development of university property will align with the best interests of the institution, the local and regional community, and the state of North Carolina, while respecting the natural environment that surrounds us,” Hart said.

The City of Asheville said it has not issued any permits for the current work, and that the permit for the work was issued through the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality.

The DEQ did not respond to my request for information by deadline.

Question: We are an older couple (even older than John) who returned home recently, flying into AVL airport. After landing, we went to the info desk by baggage claim to inquire as to taxis to get to our home in Asheville. We were told there were no taxis, and we’d have to wait in an outer lot until an Uber or Lyft could pick us up. The only alternative presented to us was a black car service (probably $150). There was a shuttle bus waiting by chance, and we proceeded to the “shed” to wait. The wind was blowing strongly right through the shed, as there was no protection from the sides from the freezing cold (wind chill of 18) and it was located in an open parking lot. Luckily for us, an Uber was available in five minutes; a Lyft would have been at least 20 minutes — enough time for frostbite to set in! This is an unacceptable situation for us and certainly for visitors to Asheville. If the airport is going to abandon those waiting for rides to a lonely parking lot, they can at least provide a better shelter with sides and a heater, as well as some sort of emergency notification system if there is a problem. Even as a temporary fix, this is unacceptable, as a medical emergency is certainly possible in the shed. Our Uber driver told us he has seen instances where the rain is blowing through the shed sideways on those waiting. When will the airport provide an acceptable waiting area for those arriving at the airport?

My answer: I’m going to politely overlook the comment about these folks being “even older” than I am. Clearly it’s time for me to up my “Just for Men” beard dye game.

Real answer: Good news on this front.

“We have installed a 12- by 15-foot covered shelter in the ground transportation pick-up area, with four benches and standing room for additional customers,” Asheville Regional Airport spokeswoman Tina Kinsey said via email, adding that it is a temporary location due to construction at the airport. “We have wind/rain barriers for the sides of the shelter coming soon, as well as additional lighting inside. The pick-up area is lighted with exterior lights, and we have an emergency call box in place for our customers.”

Question: I just finished your recent column about debris removal and was fascinated by the concept of “titled” debris. I never thought about the implications of that before. Could you expand on whether and what kind of special problems and handling that causes? For example, if there’s a car in the river, does the county have to figure out who owns it, contact them, consult on what they want done with it, whether they’ll pay for or toward the removal, whether their insurance has any liability in the effort and so forth? Can the county just act without contacting the owner at all? Is there any kind of time limit beyond which the county can do what it needs to do to clear its waterways if they can’t contact an owner?

My answer: Initially, I just assumed “titled debris” meant the county was going to have to refer to river debris as “Sir Wrecked Minivan” and “Lady Semi Trailer.”

Real answer: Nothing is simple when it comes to Helene cleanup.

“County departments, to include the Buncombe County Sheriff’s Office, County Legal Department, Solid Waste, ID Bureau, and Emergency Management are working together on title property removal,” Johanna Cano, a spokeswoman for Buncombe County, told me via email. “There are a couple of different categories of title property removal that include right of way removal, right of entry (private property), and waterway removal.”

The different categories require different types of administrative paperwork for accessing the debris.

“While we are close to finalizing the process, at this point, as title property is identified and mapped out, crews will be going around to assess the property for identification such as a vehicle identification number or tag,” Cano said. “The team will work across departments to locate the owner and make arrangements for removal. As owners are identified, they will need to check with their insurance company to determine if their coverage can pay for towing, etc.”

If not, the county will use a towing company procured through a “request for proposals” to “remove the property and take it to a processing site where it can be claimed or otherwise processed,” Cano said.


Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. Got a question? Send it to John Boyle at jboyle@avlwatchdog.org or 828-337-0941. His Answer Man columns appear each Tuesday and Friday. The Watchdog’s reporting is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/

Original article

The post What is UNC Asheville doing on wooded property near Five Points? Taxi ‘shed’ at Asheville Regional Airport? What does ‘titled debris’ actually mean? • Asheville Watchdog appeared first on avlwatchdog.org

The Watchdog

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

PETA sues American Kennel Club over standards for French bulldogs, other breeds

Published

on

www.youtube.com – ABC11 – 2025-07-10 12:44:35


SUMMARY: PETA is suing the American Kennel Club (AKC) over breeding standards for popular dog breeds like French bulldogs, pugs, and dachshunds. PETA argues these standards promote unhealthy traits causing lifelong suffering, such as bulldogs’ large skulls and shortened faces that impede breathing. The lawsuit cites UK research showing French bulldogs have poorer health, and notes the Netherlands banned breeding short-nosed dogs. Dachshunds’ long backs and short legs also lead to painful conditions. The AKC rejects PETA’s claims, stating it is committed to dogs’ health and well-being. This lawsuit continues a long-standing conflict between PETA and the AKC.

The animal rights group PETA sued Tuesday to try to force the American Kennel Club to abandon the standards it backs for hyper-popular French bulldogs and some other breeds, contending that the influential club is promoting unhealthy physical features.

More: https://abc11.com/post/peta-sues-american-kennel-club-breeding-standards-french-bulldogs-other-breeds/17038437/
Download: https://abc11.com/apps/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ABC11/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abc11_wtvd/
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@abc11_wtvd
TIKTOK: https://www.tiktok.com/@abc11_eyewitnessnews

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Boil water notice lifted in Hillsborough

Published

on

www.youtube.com – WRAL – 2025-07-09 19:50:45


SUMMARY: Hillsboro has lifted its boil water advisory, but the city and nearby Mebban still face water challenges following heavy rain from Shantel. Mebban closed non-essential businesses to conserve water as their treatment plant remains unrepaired with no clear fix timeline, leaving under two days of drinking water. Hillsboro’s plant was overwhelmed, causing multiple sanitary sewer overflows and flooding, releasing 174,000 gallons of sewage into Kate’s Creek. Repair efforts continue, with the main clear well sanitized and refilling, but full testing delays reopening. Meanwhile, Hillsboro relies on water from Durham and urges residents to conserve amid potential further storms that may worsen the situation.

Hillsborough’s boil water notice has been lifted, but the town’s water system remains vulnerable as its main treatment plant is offline.

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

AdventHealth makes its most public case for building region’s second-largest hospital, but has yet to ask the state for permission 

Published

on

avlwatchdog.org – ANDREW R. JONES – 2025-07-09 13:46:00


Florida-based nonprofit AdventHealth is seeking public support to expand its new hospital in Weaverville, North Carolina, from 93 to 222 acute-care beds. This would make it the second-largest hospital in western North Carolina and a major competitor to HCA Healthcare’s Mission Health, which currently holds a near-monopoly in Buncombe County. AdventHealth has started site work but cannot apply for the additional beds until October. The project faces legal challenges from Mission Health, which has appealed previous approvals. The expansion aims to improve access to specialty care and create jobs, but state certificate of need (CON) laws complicate the process.

Months before it can get official permission from the state, Florida-based nonprofit AdventHealth is seeking public support for a 129-bed expansion of its already approved 93-bed new hospital under construction in northern Buncombe County.

Coupled with an earlier, pending certificate of need (CON) request to the state for 26 additional beds, AdventHealth will be proposing a total of 222 acute care beds for the new facility in Weaverville, making it — if approved by state regulators, and if it withstands possible challenges from Nashville-based for-profit HCA Healthcare — the second-largest hospital in western North Carolina and the first major competitor to HCA Mission Health’s near-monopoly on hospital services in Buncombe County.

Mission Hospital in Asheville has 682 licensed acute-care beds. UNC Health Pardee in Henderson County has 201. The Charles George VA Medical Center in Buncombe County has 119. AdventHealth already operates a 62-bed hospital in Henderson County, according to the Proposed 2026 State Medical Facilities Plan.

AdventHealth in Hendersonville has 62 acute-care beds, according to the latest State Medical Facilities plan. The Florida-based nonprofit wants to expand its footprint in western North Carolina to a Weaverville hospital with 222 beds. // Watchdog photo by Katie Linsky Shaw

For months, AdventHealth, a Seventh-day Adventist nonprofit that is the largest Christian-based nonprofit hospital system in the United States, quietly has been pitching a proposal for the additional 129 beds to local leaders across the region. But this week’s public announcement of plans marks the first significant indication of AdventHealth’s vision for a much larger facility. 

The announcement, however, comes months before any possible official action. 

Applications for the additional 129 beds cannot be submitted to the state until Oct. 15, according to the 2025 State Medical Facilities Plan. AdventHealth, which owns more than 50 hospitals across the nation, has been gathering letters of support from town councils, health departments and residents in preparation for its application.

It’s already started grading work at the 30-plus acre site and is planning a groundbreaking ceremony later this year. When AdventHealth first applied for the project, the nonprofit told the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services’ Division of Health Service Regulation (DHSR) it would cost $254 million. Plans to expand the hospital will inflate the price, AdventHealth spokesperson Victoria Dunkle said. 

“We will be sharing the updated scope, scale and costs in the final application,” she said.

Though AdventHealth originally said the hospital would open by 2027, expansion and a complex application process make that aspiration unlikely.

Weaverville Mayor Patrick Fitzsimmons said that although the delays are frustrating, the prospect of a large new hospital is welcome in this town of about 4,500.

“This is a positive development for our town,” Fitzsimmons said. “We’re talking about the addition of maybe as many as a couple thousand jobs as these new hospital beds are allotted, the kind we’re trying to attract to Weaverville.”

Service area: Buncombe, Graham, Madison and Yancey

Meant to serve patients in Buncombe, Graham, Madison and Yancey counties, the facility originally was slated for only 67 beds, according to the certificate of need application AdventHealth filed in 2022, which was approved by the state months later, despite competition and opposition from other big health care systems, including the HCA Healthcare-owned Mission Health system. 

North Carolina’s CON law forces medical facilities to compete when they want to expand, add services, or buy expensive equipment. Organizations apply for projects and the state decides whether they are necessary.

In 2024 Advent added an application for 26 more beds to its original bid, bringing the total it was asking to 93. The extra 129 beds proposed this week would more than double the total bed count at the proposed Weaverville hospital.

“With 222 beds, the community will have more access to higher-level emergency and specialty care and more choices for how and where to receive this advanced care,” the release said, touting “not-for-profit, whole-person care” and “the growing needs of our region.”

An artist’s rendering shows what AdventHealth’s planned 222-acute-care-bed hospital in north Buncombe could look like when it opens in the coming years. // Photo credit: AdventHealth

Though a thumbs-up from the DHSR, the entity responsible for approving applications, is the first step to getting those beds, it’s hardly the last. CON law allows other hospitals to appeal the DHSR decision repeatedly, which Mission Health has done with all of AdventHealth’s previous approvals for the hospital. Last month an appellate court judge ruled against HCA-Mission’s most recent challenge to the 67-bed bid, which the DHSR approved more than three years ago. 

Mission Health spokesperson Katie Czerwinski declined comment on Mission’s appeals. She did not respond to a question about whether Mission would also apply for the 129 beds come October.

HCA also challenges 26-bed AdventHealth award

AdventHealth’s announcement Monday highlighted  the North Carolina Court of Appeals decision to finally greenlight the 67 beds, opposing Mission Health’s contention since 2022 that it didn’t get a fair shake in the CON process. Both Mission and Novant Health tried to win the beds that year.

“AdventHealth is grateful for the North Carolina Court of Appeals’ decision to uphold the State’s approval of our CON application for a 67-bed hospital in Buncombe County,” the news release said.

Because of CON laws and Mission’s legal contentions, AdventHealth is far from clear to finalize its vision of opening what would be one of the region’s largest hospitals by acute-care-bed count. Although the battle over the 67 beds is over now, another one is waiting on an Office of Administrative Hearings judge’s decision. Mission Health filed an appeal Dec. 20, 2024, stating that AdventHealth’s 26-bed application was erroneously granted to AdventHealth. 

“By denying Mission a CON for the Mission Application, the Agency’s Decision prevents Mission from expanding Mission Hospital to meet the needs of Mission’s existing and future patients and therefore directly limits Mission’s ability to engage in its lawful business,” the appeal said.

AdventHealth did not mention the 26 beds in its release.

“The 26-bed approval is currently under appeal by a competitor,” AdventHealth spokesperson Victoria Dunkle said Tuesday. “That appeal is being reviewed through the Office of Administrative Hearings. Despite this delay, we remain steadfast in our commitment to bring these 93 beds — and the whole-person care they represent — to the people of Western North Carolina. We are confident that the State’s original decision will be upheld, and we continue to prepare to deliver on that promise.” 

An effort to repeal CON laws, Senate Bill 370, made headway in the General Assembly this April. But that effort may be overshadowed by a 2020 lawsuit brought by a New Bern vision physician, Jay Singleton, in the state’s Supreme Court, arguing the multilayered application process “has nothing to do with protecting the health or safety of real patients.”

Currently, 34 other states have similar CON laws.

“Proponents of CON laws contend that if excess health care service capacity exists, price inflation may occur to compensate for new, underused health care services or empty beds,” according to a summary by the National Conference of State Legislators. “Opponents believe CON laws stifle competition by protecting incumbent providers and creating a burdensome approval process for establishing new facilities and services.” 


Asheville Watchdog welcomes thoughtful reader comments on this story, which has been republished on our Facebook page. Please submit your comments there.


Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. Andrew R. Jones is a Watchdog investigative reporter. Email arjones@avlwatchdog.org. The Watchdog’s local reporting is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.

Original article

The post AdventHealth makes its most public case for building region’s second-largest hospital, but has yet to ask the state for permission  appeared first on avlwatchdog.org



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

This content offers a straightforward, fact-based report on AdventHealth’s hospital expansion plans and the surrounding regulatory and legal environment. It primarily focuses on healthcare infrastructure development, regulatory processes, and competition dynamics without expressing partisan opinions or ideological viewpoints. The article presents multiple perspectives, including that of AdventHealth, its competitors, local officials, and regulatory authorities, maintaining an objective tone typical of centrist reporting.

Continue Reading

Trending