Kaiser Health News
Union With Labor Dispute of Its Own Threatens to Cut Off Workers’ Health Benefits
Phil Galewitz, KFF Health News
Fri, 26 Jul 2024 09:00:00 +0000
The National Education Association, the nation’s largest union, is threatening to cut off health insurance to about 300 Washington, D.C.-based workers on Aug. 1 in an effort to end a bitter contract dispute.
It’s a tactic some private employers have used as leverage against unionized workers that has drawn scrutiny from congressional Democrats and is prohibited for state employers in California. Experts on labor law say they’ve never seen a union make the move against its own workers.
“This is like a man-bites-dog situation where the union is now in a position as the employer,” said Paul Clark, a professor of labor and employment relations at Penn State University. “It’s not a good look for a union.”
NEA workers with pressing health needs are worried but say they won’t fold. Joye Mercer Barksdale, a writer on the NEA’s government relations team, said she needs coverage for a medical procedure to address atrial fibrillation, a cardiac disorder. “This is insane for the NEA to use our health benefits as a bargaining chip,” she said.
But Barksdale said the threat isn’t enough to force her to agree to an unacceptable contract. “I am not ready to give in,” she said.
The NEA Staff Organization, the union representing workers at the NEA’s headquarters, launched a strike on July 5 in Philadelphia, during the union’s annual delegate assembly. It was its second walkout this summer as the two parties negotiate a new contract, navigating sticking points such as wages and remote work.
In response, the NEA ended the conference early. President Joe Biden was supposed to speak at the event but withdrew, refusing to cross the picket line. The NEA on July 24 endorsed Kamala Harris for president.
On July 8, the day after the conference had been scheduled to end, the NEA locked out workers. In a letter the day before, the NEA informed its unionized workers that they would not be paid, effective immediately, and their health benefits would expire at the end of July unless a new deal were reached.
“NEA cannot allow NEASO to act again in a way that will bring such lasting harm to our members and our organization,” Kim Anderson, the NEA’s executive director, wrote in the letter, obtained by KFF Health News. “We are, and have always been, committed both to our union values and to the importance of conducting ourselves as a model employer.”
Democrats in Congress, including Sens. Sherrod Brown of Ohio and Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, introduced legislation last year to protect striking workers from losing their health benefits, after several large companies, including General Motors, John Deere, RTX (formerly Raytheon Technologies), and the maker of Kellogg’s cereals, threatened to or did cut off coverage during labor disputes.
“Workers shouldn’t have to choose between their family’s health and a fair contract,” Brown said in a statement to KFF Health News.
The legislation was endorsed by large labor unions including the Service Employees International Union and United Steelworkers, according to a press release from Brown’s office. The NEA wasn’t among them.
“This tactic is immoral, and it should be illegal,” United Steelworkers’ president at the time, Thomas Conway, said in the release.
Officials at the NEA, which represents teachers and other administrators, declined an interview request. In a statement, the organization’s president, Becky Pringle, said “we are making every effort to reach an agreement as quickly as possible” with its staff union.
“As union leaders who have been on strike, we recognize the significance and impact of these important decisions on a personal and family level. We truly value our employees and look forward to continued collaboration with NEASO to develop a new contract that benefits us all,” she said.
Kate Hilts, a digital strategist who works for the NEA, said she fears losing her coverage will leave her unable to afford treatment for a rare autoimmune disease that attacks her kidneys. Her next treatment was slated for August.
“I wake up every day and can’t believe this is happening,” she said. “You would expect this from an employer that is antiworker or has a terrible labor record, but I am totally flabbergasted that a labor union would do this that bills itself as pro-worker, pro-family, pro-education, and pro-children.”
The NEA staff union has filed multiple charges with the National Labor Relations Board this year, including allegations that the NEA withheld holiday overtime pay and failed to provide information on the outsourcing of millions of dollars in bargaining unit work.
California is one of the only states that protect striking workers from losing health coverage. The state legislature passed a law in 2021 that blocks the tactic from being used against public employees and another law in 2022 that allows any striking workers who lose their insurance to immediately get heavily discounted coverage through the state’s Affordable Care Act marketplace.
If they remain locked out, the NEA workers would be eligible for coverage under COBRA, a federal program that allows people who are fired or laid off to maintain their employer-sponsored insurance for 18 months.
But the coverage can be a financial hardship, as individuals often must pay the entire cost of their insurance premiums, plus a 2% administrative fee.
Another option for workers would be coverage through the Affordable Care Act marketplace, though that also could be costly. And it may be unclear how soon that coverage would begin or whether insurers would cover their existing doctors.
“I’m hoping the NEA will be so ashamed of what they are doing that, at the very least, they will not take away our health benefits,” Barksdale said.
——————————
By: Phil Galewitz, KFF Health News
Title: Union With Labor Dispute of Its Own Threatens to Cut Off Workers’ Health Benefits
Sourced From: kffhealthnews.org/news/article/nea-national-education-association-union-threatens-health-insurance-benefit-lockout/
Published Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 09:00:00 +0000
Did you miss our previous article…
https://www.biloxinewsevents.com/the-cdcs-test-for-bird-flu-works-but-it-has-issues/
Kaiser Health News
TV’s Dr. Oz Invested in Businesses Regulated by Agency Trump Wants Him To Lead
SUMMARY: President-elect Donald Trump nominated celebrity doctor Mehmet Oz to head the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Oz, known for his investments in healthcare, tech, and food companies, holds significant stakes in UnitedHealth Group, CVS Health, Amazon, and other companies involved in health insurance and pharmaceuticals, raising potential conflicts of interest. His financial ties include hospital stocks and pharmaceutical investments. Oz has expressed support for Medicare Advantage and criticized the food and healthcare industries. Critics question whether Oz can separate his financial interests from his role, particularly with companies doing business with the federal government.
The post TV’s Dr. Oz Invested in Businesses Regulated by Agency Trump Wants Him To Lead appeared first on kffhealthnews.org
Kaiser Health News
Florida Gov. DeSantis’ Canadian Drug Import Plan Goes Nowhere After FDA Approval
SUMMARY: Florida’s plan to import lower-cost prescription drugs from Canada, approved by the FDA nearly a year ago, has yet to launch. Governor Ron DeSantis praised the program, anticipated to save state agencies up to $180 million, but officials lack a start date. Despite bipartisan support for drug importation, complications persist, including operational challenges and safety concerns from the pharmaceutical industry. DeSantis has filed lawsuits against the FDA for delays and Florida has already spent $50 million on the initiative with no drugs imported. Other states, like Colorado, face similar hurdles in establishing importation programs.
The post Florida Gov. DeSantis’ Canadian Drug Import Plan Goes Nowhere After FDA Approval appeared first on kffhealthnews.org
Kaiser Health News
California Sets 15% Target for Primary Care Spending Over Next Decade
SUMMARY: California’s Office of Health Care Affordability has set a goal for insurers to allocate 15% of their spending to primary care by 2034, aiming to address the state’s shortage of primary care providers and improve preventive care. The current spending rate is 7%. This ambitious target seeks to reduce long-term healthcare costs by emphasizing early diagnosis and disease prevention. However, the state’s plan faces challenges, as it conflicts with a 3.5% cap on overall healthcare spending growth. The state will monitor progress, offering financial incentives to insurers who meet primary care spending goals, with the hope of expanding access and improving health outcomes.
The post California Sets 15% Target for Primary Care Spending Over Next Decade appeared first on kffhealthnews.org
-
Our Mississippi Home6 days ago
Create Art from Molten Metal: Southern Miss Sculpture to Host Annual Interactive Iron Pour
-
Local News5 days ago
Celebrate the holidays in Ocean Springs with free, festive activities for the family
-
News from the South - Georgia News Feed6 days ago
'Hunting for females' | First day of trial in Laken Riley murder reveals evidence not seen yet
-
News from the South - Alabama News Feed6 days ago
First woman installed as commanding officer of NAS Pensacola
-
Kaiser Health News3 days ago
A Closely Watched Trial Over Idaho’s Near-Total Abortion Ban Continues Tuesday
-
Mississippi Today5 days ago
On this day in 1972
-
News from the South - Alabama News Feed2 days ago
Trial underway for Sheila Agee, the mother accused in deadly Home Depot shooting
-
News from the South - Alabama News Feed2 days ago
Alabama's weather forecast is getting colder, and a widespread frost and freeze is likely by the …