Connect with us

The Center Square

How Handgun Laws in Mississippi Compare to Other States | Mississippi

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Samuel Stebbins, 24/7 Wall St. via The Center Square – 2023-08-07 11:22:41

The debate over gun control in the United States has centered largely on assault-style rifles, like the AR-15. Surging in popularity in recent years, AR-15 style firearms are now the best selling rifle in the U.S. — and they have also been used in 10 of the country’s 17 deadliest mass shootings since 2012. But while AR-15s have dominated the political debate, both in Washington and statehouses across the country, every year in the U.S., handguns take a far greater toll on public health.

According to the FBI, 13,620 homicides were carried out with a firearm in 2020, and at least 59% of them were determined to have been carried out with a handgun. Meanwhile, only 3% of homicides were committed with a rifle. Additionally, a study published by the New England Journal of Medicine found that risk of suicide-by-firearm is eight times higher for male handgun owners than non-owners, and 35 times higher for female handgun owners. (Here is a look at the states where gun-related crimes are surging.)

In light of the specific risks posed by handguns, several states have implemented policies to better ensure safe and responsible ownership. These include background check expansions, mandatory safety courses, waiting periods for prospective buyers, and licensing and permitting procedures. Most states, however, have done none of the above — and in these places, virtually any adult without a record of criminal violence can legally obtain a handgun in a matter of minutes.

Mississippi is one of these states. Not only are there no universal background check laws for prospective handgun buyers, but there are also no mandatory waiting periods, licensing, or safety training requirements.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there were 962 firearm-related fatalities in Mississippi in 2021, or 33.9 for every 100,000 people, the highest gun death rate among the 50 states.

All data on handgun purchase and ownership requirements in this story was compiled by the Giffords Law Center, a gun control advocacy group.

 

State Licensing and safety training requirements for handguns Universal background checks for handgun purchases Mandatory waiting periods for handgun purchases
Alabama None No None
Alaska None No None
Arizona None No None
Arkansas None No None
California Safety training to obtain certificate Yes 10 days
Colorado None Yes 3 days (effective Oct. 1, 2023)
Connecticut Permit and safety training required for purchase Yes None
Delaware None Yes None
Florida None No 3 days minimum
Georgia None No None
Hawaii Permit and safety training required for purchase Yes 14 days
Idaho None No None
Illinois Ownership license required Yes 72 hours
Indiana None No None
Iowa None No None
Kansas None No None
Kentucky None No None
Louisiana None No None
Maine None No None
Maryland Permit and safety training required for purchase Yes 7 days
Massachusetts Safety training, permit required for purchase, license required for ownership Yes None
Michigan Permit required for purchase Yes None
Minnesota Permit required for purchase from private sellers No 30 days if bought from a dealer
Mississippi None No None
Missouri None No None
Montana None No None
Nebraska Permit required for purchase Yes None
Nevada None Yes None
New Hampshire None No None
New Jersey Permit and safety training required for purchase Yes 7 days
New Mexico None Yes None
New York License required for purchase and ownership Yes None
North Carolina None No None
North Dakota None No None
Ohio None No None
Oklahoma None No None
Oregon Permit and safety training required for purchase Yes None
Pennsylvania None Yes None
Rhode Island Permit and safety training required for purchase Yes 7 days
South Carolina None No None
South Dakota None No None
Tennessee None No None
Texas None No None
Utah None No None
Vermont None Yes None
Virginia None Yes None
Washington None Yes None
West Virginia None No None
Wisconsin None No None
Wyoming None No None

 

Read More

The post How Handgun Laws in Mississippi Compare to Other States | Mississippi appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

The Center Square

Poll: American voters don’t want data centers built in their communities | Energy

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Jon Styf – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-02 08:45:00


A Libertas Network poll of 1,200 U.S. voters found 46% oppose building AI data centers in their communities, with opposition rising when tax incentives are involved. Data centers, vital for AI computing and storage, often receive tax breaks despite minimal staffing and high energy use. Concerns include rising energy bills and lost tax revenues—over $100 million annually in at least 10 states. Projects frequently involve secrecy agreements, hiding details from the public. Some states, like Wisconsin and Virginia, are adjusting laws and managing backlogs as they balance economic benefits against regulatory, tax, and energy challenges posed by data center development.

(The Center Square) – Most U.S. voters oppose having data centers built in their community and even more oppose the data centers if tax incentives are awarded to have them built, according to a poll released Wednesday morning by Libertas Network.

Overton Insights asked 1,200 registered voters the questions between June 23-26 on behalf of Libertas, which says it focuses on family education and policy reform as it looks to “change hearts, minds and laws to create a freer future.”

Libertas had Overton Insights ask the data center questions upon suggestion from The Center Square.

The poll asked voters specifically if they supported or opposed building new data centers for artificial intelligence in their community with 46% of respondents strongly or somewhat opposing the prospect, 36% strongly or somewhat supporting and 18% uncertain.

Of those that supported building data centers in their community, 69% still supported the idea if tax subsidies or incentives were involved to bring the data centers while 23% or those initially supportive would oppose the idea if those tax breaks were involved.

Data center projects have popped up across the country in recent years with many of those proposals including tax breaks.

The data centers are used to create the computing power for AI and to store the large amounts of information needed for those technologies but the Incentives are often opposed because, despite the large amount of money spent on the buildings, they do not require much staff and they take a large amount of energy.

The average American’s energy bill could increase from 25% to 70% in the next 10 years without intervention from policymakers, according to Washington, D.C.-based think tank the Jack Kemp Foundation.

A least 10 states are currently losing $100 million or more in taxes from data centers, according to an April report from Good Jobs First.

Data centers often require politicians to sign non-disclosure agreements during the proposal process, including keeping the name of the technology company involved along with the details of a project secret.

The secrecy occurred during the process of building a recent Indianapolis data center, according to WFYI, while the names have leaked of developers involved in several Wisconsin data center projects where state lawmakers are asking to create a data center exception to state laws on property tax captures at the sites to lure the projects to the state.

“These data centers are so big and so valuable and such a prize for a community that (state laws capping TIFs) really creates a problem,” said Wisconsin Sen. John Jagler, R-Watertown.

Virginia currently has a backlog of data center projects as they complete interconnection studies to ensure they can safely attach to the energy grid.

Projects needing more than 50 megawatts of power often require transmission-level access, which adds federal oversight from PJM, the regional grid operator for Virginia and 12 other states.

The post Poll: American voters don’t want data centers built in their communities | Energy appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

This article largely reports on the opposition of U.S. voters to data centers in their communities, particularly when tax incentives are involved, and highlights concerns over energy consumption, tax revenue loss, and secrecy in data center deals. While it maintains a mostly factual tone, the choice to emphasize potential downsides—such as rising energy costs, tax breaks controversy, and non-disclosure agreements—reflects a viewpoint often associated with conservative or center-right skepticism of government incentives and large corporate projects. The article cites sources and lawmakers who question the benefits of data centers, but it does not overtly promote a partisan agenda, resulting in a center-right leaning report grounded in reported concerns.

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Bill vote: No change detected by North Carolinians in U.S. House | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-02 06:57:00


The U.S. House is debating the 887-page reconciliation budget bill, with all 14 North Carolina members yet to change their May 22 votes—10 Republicans in favor, four Democrats opposed. Republican Rep. Richard Hudson criticized Democrats for supporting excessive Medicaid spending for illegal aliens and other programs, emphasizing the bill’s importance for America’s fiscal health. Republican Rep. Virginia Foxx leads efforts to advance the bill, while Democratic Rep. Deborah Ross opposes it, joining others to seek protections against cuts to SNAP benefits. Some Republicans stress tax relief, border security, and energy security as key bill goals. No vote shifts have been reported.

(The Center Square) – As the U.S. House of Representatives takes up the now 887-page version of the reconciliation budget bill, questions on change of votes from a 215-214 decision are paramount.

North Carolina’s 14 members, through early Wednesday morning, were yet to show change. All 10 Republicans were for the House version on May 22 and all four Democrats were against it.

“If the One Big Beautiful Bill Act doesn’t pass, it will have disastrous effects on America’s fiscal trajectory,” said Republican Rep. Richard Hudson. “House Republicans are going to get this done.”

He said “the Democrats voting against it are in favor of” more than “$700 billion in wasteful Medicaid spending for illegal aliens and people who can work but refuse to, instead of America’s most vulnerable; $500 billion in Green New Deal giveaways and luxury EV credits; nearly $200 billion in SNAP waste, fraud and abuse; illegal aliens continuing to receive taxpayer-funded benefits, including Medicaid.”

Republican Rep. Virginia Foxx leads the Rules Committee that immediately got the bill back on the floor for debate. Her reposts on social media did not indicate a change of heart.

“Senate Republicans passed their terrible budget bill today, so I’m back in D.C. fighting for North Carolinians and everyone who would be hurt by this cruel transfer of wealth from everyday Americans to the ultra-rich,” Democratic Rep. Deborah Ross said on Tuesday.

She joined Democratic Rep. Alma Adams’ letter to Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., with 31 other signatures requesting “harmful cuts to the federal SNAP program” be eliminated.

Reps. Tim Moore, Addison McDowell and Brad Knott indicated undoubtable favor with the Senate’s changes.

“Small businesses need the One Big Beautiful Bill’s tax relief and will suffer if Democrats succeed in stalling this historic legislation,” Knott said. “We must pass OBBB and deliver for all Americans, especially small business owners.”

He also said the “goal is simple: deliver for the American people” and cited tax relief for “individuals, families, family farms and small businesses; border security; public safety; energy security.”

There was no indication of change following the Senate passage in either direction from Republican Reps. Dr. Greg Murphy, Rev. Mark Harris, David Rouzer or Pat Harrigan or Democratic Reps. Don Davis and Valerie Foushee.

The post Bill vote: No change detected by North Carolinians in U.S. House | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article exhibits a right-leaning bias primarily through selective framing and language use favoring Republican viewpoints. It prominently features Republican representatives’ criticism of the budget bill using charged terms like “wasteful Medicaid spending,” “Green New Deal giveaways,” and “cruel transfer of wealth,” while quoting Democratic responses more neutrally and briefly. The Republicans’ perspectives receive more detailed emphasis and negative framing of Democratic positions, which subtly supports conservative fiscal and policy critiques. Although it reports on both parties’ stances, the tone and framing lean toward promoting a conservative critique of the legislation rather than presenting a fully neutral or balanced overview.

Continue Reading

The Center Square

Trump, DeSantis to unveil ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ detention facility | Florida

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Bethany Blankley – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-01 08:14:00


President Donald Trump visited Florida’s new large-scale state-run deportation facility in the Everglades, marking the first of its kind. Florida leads with numerous state agencies partnering with ICE and was the first to launch a program protecting ICE officers. The facility, located at the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport near the Everglades, was proposed by Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier and can house up to 3,000 detainees, with the first arrivals expected immediately. Gov. Ron DeSantis emphasized Florida’s full support for Trump’s deportation mission, highlighting the facility’s efficiency for processing and deporting criminal foreign nationals.

(The Center Square) — President Donald Trump is visiting the first large-scale state-run deportation facility in the country in the Florida Everglades on Tuesday morning.

In addition to Florida having the most state agencies and law enforcement entities participating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and being the first state to launch a program to protect ICE officers, it’s also the first to build a massive deportation facility to support Trump’s deportation efforts.

The president will meet with Gov. Ron DeSantis and Attorney General James Uthmeier who proposed the location and construction of the facility.

U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Immigration and Custom Enforcement Acting Director Todd Lyons and Florida Division of Emergency Management Executive Director Kevin Guthrie will also be in attendance.

Two weeks ago, Uthmeier proposed that the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport be used to assist with ICE deportation efforts. The 30-square mile airport owned by Miami-Dade County is located roughly 60 miles east of Miami near the Everglades National Park. Its 10,000-foot-long asphalt runway is used for military training exercises and was intended to be part of Miami’s new airport before a public outcry halted construction in 1970.

“Florida’s been leading on immigration enforcement, supporting the Trump administration and ICE’s efforts to detain and deport criminal aliens,” Uthmeier said. “The governor tasked state leaders to identify places for new temporary detention facilities. I think this is the best one, as I call it Alligator Alcatraz.”

“It presents an efficient, low-cost opportunity to build a temporary detention facility because you don’t need to invest that much in the perimeter,” he said. “If people get out, there’s not much waiting for them other than alligators and pythons. Nowhere to go, nowhere to hide.”

He said the facility would be ready within 30 to 60 days after construction, with the potential to house 1,000 criminal foreign nationals.

However, the first detainees are expected to arrive as early as Tuesday, and the site will be able to hold up to 3,000 at a time, Gov. DeSantis said.

In a preview with Fox News, DeSantis explained, “the state of Florida is all in on President Trump’s [mass deportation] mission.” In an effort to help federal agents with processing and staging removal operations, the state identified the airport as a base of operations.

“There needs to be more ability to intake, process and then deport,” DeSantis said. “We’ve got a massive runway where any of the federal agencies want to fly these people back to their home country, they can do it in a one stop shop.”

The post Trump, DeSantis to unveil ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ detention facility | Florida appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article presents a clear ideological perspective aligned with conservative and right-leaning views on immigration enforcement. The tone is largely supportive of President Donald Trump’s deportation efforts and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis’ immigration policies, emphasizing state leadership in immigration enforcement and portraying the new detention facility positively. The language used—such as describing the facility’s location as “Alligator Alcatraz” and highlighting the ease and efficiency of deportation efforts—frames the initiative as practical and tough on immigration. There is no counterpoint or critique presented, which suggests an endorsement of the policy rather than neutral reporting. Overall, the article promotes a pro-enforcement, pro-Trump immigration stance consistent with right-leaning ideology.

Continue Reading

Trending