Connect with us

The Center Square

20-state coalition fights Treasury claim that certain banking policies are security threat | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – 2024-08-07 07:18:00

(The Center Square) – Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody is leading a 20-state coalition opposing a Treasury Department claim that state laws preventing de-banking policies are a “national security threat.” The latest action is only an “attempt to stoke confusion about state laws to advance extreme activist agendas,” Moody said.

“The Biden-Harris administration has pushed a radical agenda since its first day in office,” Moody said. “From open borders, to attacking gas stoves and washing machines, they now are attempting to use the power of the Treasury Department to accuse states, that seek to protect their citizens from unjustified radical de-banking, of being a national security threat. This is nothing more than another attempt to leverage the power of the federal government to achieve this administration’s destabilizing, activist agenda.”

In a letter to Yellen, the coalition expressed their “serious objections to your department’s recent letter characterizing state laws attempting to protect individuals from de-banking as harmful to national security.”

At issue is a request from U.S. Rep. Josh Gottheimer, D-NJ, who argues state laws are “fracturing the national banking system” and “may conflict with federal laws intended to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.” His letter doesn’t mention ESG policies but questions “when states enact laws that subject banks to processes and disclosure requirements that are at cross-purposes with federal law, SAR confidentiality could be jeopardized,” referring to federal law requiring banks to file suspicious activity reports.

No state laws prohibit banks from filing SARs or from complying with the Bank Secrecy Act.

Last month, Gottheimer expressed concerns to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen at a U.S. House Committee on Financial Services hearing about “recent state laws that require banks to provide an explanation with specific reasons for closing or denying an account including situations where the decision was related to financial crimes risk.” He was concerned they “may conflict with federal requirements, especially the obligations that banks have under the federal anti-money laundering laws, that prevent terrorists and illicit financing in the US financial systems.”

In response, Yellen said banks are required to file SARs and comply with federal law. Treasury Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence Brian Nelson then sent a letter to Gottheimer saying they shared his concerns.

“State laws interfering with financial institutions’ ability to comply with national security requirements heighten the risk that international drug traffickers, transnational organized criminals, terrorists, and corrupt foreign officials will use the U.S. financial system to launder money, evade sanctions, and threaten our national security,” Nelson wrote, referring to a newly enacted Florida law, HB 989.

Nelson claims HB 989 “defines as an ‘unsafe and unsound practice’ a financial institution’s reliance on any factor that is ‘not a quantitative … standard’ to determine which customers to serve or services to offer” and “prohibits consideration of a person’s ‘affiliations’ or ‘business sector’ to make these decisions.”

An AP “Climate Desk” initiative claims the Florida law bans Environmental, Social, Governance policies. According to the bill language, it was filed to prohibit financial institutions from discriminating against customers based on their religious and political views and from creating a social credit score system to restrict or penalize their purchases or access to credit because of them.

The law protects “consumers from discrimination and entities like religious organizations, gun manufacturers, and those engaged in fossil fuel exploration from improper political pressure for their lawful and often constitutionally protected activities,” Moody said. “No consumer or business should be denied services based on political beliefs or religious views or because of some arbitrary social credit score derived from ideological agendas.”

Nelson’s letter “deliberately misleads financial institutions,” Moody argues, “by falsely suggesting” that HB 989 prohibits them from considering whether a consumer is associated with designated terrorist groups. It was passed to ensure “that financial institutions focus on true risk-based factors and stay out of the business of forcing radical social policies,” she said. Claiming “that prohibiting discrimination will harm national security” is “outlandish.”

Florida already prohibits state pension money from being invested in funds that advance ESG policies. Gov. Ron DeSantis has taken executive action on the issue for several years. Last year, he led a coalition of 18 governors to fight the Biden-Harris ESG agenda; 25 state attorneys general also sued to block a federal ESG plan they argue could jeopardize the retirement savings of two-thirds of the U.S. population.

The Treasury “has once again forsaken its statutory role and instead chosen to intervene on behalf of activists seeking to hijack the financial system for their political ends,” the coalition argues. “It is even more disappointing that the Treasury Department would use ‘national security’ as cover for large banks’ abuse of power to achieve those ends.”

Joining Moody are attorneys general from Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming.

Read More

The post 20-state coalition fights Treasury claim that certain banking policies are security threat | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

The Center Square

Man ‘angry with pharmacies’ allegedly kills worker after Luigi Mangione Act filed | California

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Kenneth Schrupp – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-03 19:30:00

(The Center Square) – A California man “angry with pharmacies” is accused of murdering a Walgreens employee Monday, days after the Luigi Mangione Act was filed with the state and drew scrutiny for invoking an alleged murderer’s name. 

Police say the suspect traveled to a Walgreens an hour from this home, did not know the victim and was apprehended as he was reloading his gun. 

At a press conference, Madera police said the alleged murderer had made “some statements about being angry with pharmacies.” ABC 30 reports that victim Erick Velazquez was not a pharmacist, and was a respected husband and father of two children. 

Just days before Velazquez’s death, the Luigi Mangione Access to Health Care Act was submitted as a statewide ballot initiative. Under the proposed measure, it would be more difficult for insurers to modify a physician-prescribed treatment plan, as only doctors would be able to deny, delay or modify medical procedures or medications.

The California Association of Health Plans, an industry association whose members cover tens of millions of Californians, told CBS 8 the measure’s proposed name was “repugnant.” Mangione is accused of killing UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. 

“The lawyer behind this measure is trying to use a murder and act of terrorism to market his political agenda,” said CAHP. “It is a repugnant action by anyone, but especially someone sworn to uphold the Constitution and law.”

Walgreens issued a statement of support for Velazquez’s family, and a GoFundMe has been set up to support his wife and children amid their sudden loss.

The post Man ‘angry with pharmacies’ allegedly kills worker after Luigi Mangione Act filed | California appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Texas House committee advances school choice bill, a first in state history | Texas

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-03 17:22:00

(The Center Square) – The Texas House Committee on Public Education on Thursday passed a school choice bill for the first time in state history.

The committee, chaired by state Rep. Brad Buckley, R-Killeen, passed SB 2, filed by state Sen. Brandon Creighton, R-Conroe, which passed the Texas Senate and was sent to the House for consideration. The legislation would create an Education Savings Account program to provide taxpayer-funded subsidies for primarily low-income families of roughly $10,000 per student.

Both the Texas Senate and House proposed budgets allocating $1 billion for the program to support roughly 100,000 students, prioritizing low-income and special needs students, The Center Square reported. The savings accounts can be used by parents to send their children to the school of their choice, including private schools.

The committee advanced the bill by a vote of 9-6. It also passed HB 2, a school funding bill filed by Buckley by a vote of 13-2. Buckley filed an education package, including HB 2, HB 3, the House version of SB 2, and HB 4, implementing public school assessment and accountability processes, The Center Square reported

The package was filed after House Speaker Dustin Burrows, R-Lubbock, identified expanding public-school funding and creating the state’s first ESA program as legislative priorities. Public education and creating Texas’ first ESA were also identified as emergency legislative items by Gov. Greg Abbot. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick listed school choice as a legislative priority in the Texas Senate, which has passed school choice bills for several years that went nowhere in the Texas House.

Abbott praised the committee vote, saying, “Texas is within reach of the largest school choice program launch in the nation.” Abbott has led the charge to pass the bill after previous efforts failed in the House, including successfully campaigning last year to replace House Republicans who opposed the measure. Abbott’s efforts paid off. Many new House Republicans won their primary, runoff and general elections and were sworn into office in January, all vowing to vote for the bill.

The committee “moved universal school choice one step closer to reaching my desk,” Abbott said. “This achievement was truly a team effort. Chairman Brad Buckley and the members of his committee worked around-the-clock to hear public testimony that lasted for nearly 24 hours. I thank them, as well as Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, Speaker Dustin Burrows, and Chairman Brandon Creighton, for their tireless work to empower Texas parents and students by providing school choice. I look forward to its swift passage in the Texas House and signing this bill into law.”

Earlier this year, Burrows said the bill would pass. He has joined Abbott at events promoting it, The Center Square reported.

According to a recent poll, a majority of registered voters surveyed in Texas, 63%, support a proposal to create Texas’ first Education Savings Account program, The Center Square reported.

Support exists across multiple demographics. The majority of Black respondents, 69%, white respondents, 62%, and Latino respondents, 59%, support an ESA program open to all students. Likewise, 78% of Republicans, 64% of Independents and 46% of Democrats support it.

A “Texas Trends” survey launched by the University of Houston’s Hobby School of Public Affairs and Texas Southern University also reported similar support. Of the nearly 2,300 Texans surveyed, 69% said they support an ESA program for all parents statewide, The Center Square reported.

“There is across-the-board support, not only across racial and partisan lines, but among urban, suburban and rural voters,” Jim Granato, dean and professor at the Hobby School, said. “Rural residents, and the legislators who represent them, have traditionally joined with urban Democrats to oppose voucher proposals, but we found 63% of respondents in rural and semi-rural areas support vouchers open to all families, along with 64% of suburban residents and 67% of urban residents.”

The ESA bill and other Buckley measures that passed will next go before the full House for a vote.

The post Texas House committee advances school choice bill, a first in state history | Texas appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Continue Reading

The Center Square

House committees: New questions emerge about Democrat fundraising platform ActBlue | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Morgan Sweeney – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-03 16:49:00

(The Center Square) – A congressional investigation into online Democratic campaign contribution platform ActBlue is ongoing, with a new report from joint interim staff and a letter to the organization’s CEO requesting additional documents.

The platform aroused Republican suspicions leading up to the 2024 presidential election, with some elected officials raising concerns that Democrats might be using the platform to circumvent campaign finance laws. 

The newly released staff report claims that despite knowing that “both foreign and domestic” actors were using the platform fraudulently, ActBlue executives and staff did not vigilantly work to combat the platform’s exploitation. 

“Twice [in 2024] – once in April and once in September – ActBlue changed its fraud-prevention standards to make them ‘more lenient’” and later “attempted to hide the changes” to avoid looking suspicious, according to the report. 

“For example, ActBlue’s training guide for new fraud-prevention employees instructed them to ‘look for reasons to accept contributions,’ rather than err on the side of flagging suspicious donations,” the report reads. 

Recent news raises additional questions about ActBlue’s ability to comply with relevant federal election and campaign finance laws, according to a news release from the House Judiciary Committee. 

It cites reporting from The New York Times about “at least seven senior staff members, including ActBlue’s ‘highest-ranking legal officer,’” having resigned since late February. 

The chairmen of the Committee on House Administration, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the Judiciary Committee wrote to ActBlue CEO Regina Wallace-Jones for additional documentation regarding ActBlue’s legal compliance.

“ActBlue’s internal turmoil, lack of a functioning legal team, possible retaliatory actions, and failure to take fraud seriously raise a host of new questions about the platform’s ability to deter fraud and comply with legal requirements,” wrote the chairmen.

They asked to receive the documents and schedule two transcribed interviews by April 16.

The post House committees: New questions emerge about Democrat fundraising platform ActBlue | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Continue Reading

Trending